Cargando…

Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study

Background: Many chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents have been introduced and marketed since 1970s, with each new one being better and effective than the previously introduced. Papacarie and Carisolv are new systems in the field of CMCR techniques. These are reportedly minimally invasive me...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Boob, Ankush Ramnarayan, Manjula, M, Reddy, E Rajendra, Srilaxmi, N, Rani, Tabitha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206231
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1226
_version_ 1782332001718632448
author Boob, Ankush Ramnarayan
Manjula, M
Reddy, E Rajendra
Srilaxmi, N
Rani, Tabitha
author_facet Boob, Ankush Ramnarayan
Manjula, M
Reddy, E Rajendra
Srilaxmi, N
Rani, Tabitha
author_sort Boob, Ankush Ramnarayan
collection PubMed
description Background: Many chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents have been introduced and marketed since 1970s, with each new one being better and effective than the previously introduced. Papacarie and Carisolv are new systems in the field of CMCR techniques. These are reportedly minimally invasive methods of removing carious dentin while preserving sound dentin. Aim: To compare the Efficiency (time taken for caries removal) and effectiveness (Knoop hardness number of the remaining dentin) of caries removal by three minimally invasive methods, i.e. hand excavation and chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie. Materials and methods: Thirty recently extracted human permanent molars with occlusal carious lesions were divided randomly in three equal groups and bisected through the middle of the lesion mesiodistally and excavated by two methods on each tooth. Results: Statistically significant difference was present among three methods with respect to time and knoop hardness values (KHN) of the remaining dentin. Conclusion: The Efficiency of Hand method is better compared to CMCR techniques and effectiveness of CMCR techniques is better than Hand method in terms of dentin preservation so the chances of maintaining vitality of the pulp will be enhanced. How to cite this article: Boob AR, Manjula M, Reddy ER, Srilaxmi N, Rani T. Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(1):11-18.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4144065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41440652014-09-09 Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study Boob, Ankush Ramnarayan Manjula, M Reddy, E Rajendra Srilaxmi, N Rani, Tabitha Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article Background: Many chemomechanical caries removal (CMCR) agents have been introduced and marketed since 1970s, with each new one being better and effective than the previously introduced. Papacarie and Carisolv are new systems in the field of CMCR techniques. These are reportedly minimally invasive methods of removing carious dentin while preserving sound dentin. Aim: To compare the Efficiency (time taken for caries removal) and effectiveness (Knoop hardness number of the remaining dentin) of caries removal by three minimally invasive methods, i.e. hand excavation and chemomechanical caries removal using Carisolv and Papacarie. Materials and methods: Thirty recently extracted human permanent molars with occlusal carious lesions were divided randomly in three equal groups and bisected through the middle of the lesion mesiodistally and excavated by two methods on each tooth. Results: Statistically significant difference was present among three methods with respect to time and knoop hardness values (KHN) of the remaining dentin. Conclusion: The Efficiency of Hand method is better compared to CMCR techniques and effectiveness of CMCR techniques is better than Hand method in terms of dentin preservation so the chances of maintaining vitality of the pulp will be enhanced. How to cite this article: Boob AR, Manjula M, Reddy ER, Srilaxmi N, Rani T. Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(1):11-18. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2014 2014-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4144065/ /pubmed/25206231 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1226 Text en Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Boob, Ankush Ramnarayan
Manjula, M
Reddy, E Rajendra
Srilaxmi, N
Rani, Tabitha
Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study
title Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study
title_full Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study
title_fullStr Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study
title_short Evaluation of the Efficiency and Effectiveness of Three Minimally Invasive Methods of Caries Removal: An in vitro Study
title_sort evaluation of the efficiency and effectiveness of three minimally invasive methods of caries removal: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206231
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1226
work_keys_str_mv AT boobankushramnarayan evaluationoftheefficiencyandeffectivenessofthreeminimallyinvasivemethodsofcariesremovalaninvitrostudy
AT manjulam evaluationoftheefficiencyandeffectivenessofthreeminimallyinvasivemethodsofcariesremovalaninvitrostudy
AT reddyerajendra evaluationoftheefficiencyandeffectivenessofthreeminimallyinvasivemethodsofcariesremovalaninvitrostudy
AT srilaxmin evaluationoftheefficiencyandeffectivenessofthreeminimallyinvasivemethodsofcariesremovalaninvitrostudy
AT ranitabitha evaluationoftheefficiencyandeffectivenessofthreeminimallyinvasivemethodsofcariesremovalaninvitrostudy