Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study

Aim: This study was undertaken to evaluate the percentage of gutta-percha-filled area (PGFA) using microscopic analysis of the cross-sections in the apical third of root canals when filled either with Thermafil technique, Warm Vertical Condensation technique and Cold Lateral Condensation technique w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Samadi, Firoza, Jaiswal, JN, Saha, Sonali, Garg, Nishita, Chowdhary, Swati, Samadi, Fahad, Tripathi, Vandana Pandey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206229
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1224
_version_ 1782332001961902080
author Samadi, Firoza
Jaiswal, JN
Saha, Sonali
Garg, Nishita
Chowdhary, Swati
Samadi, Fahad
Tripathi, Vandana Pandey
author_facet Samadi, Firoza
Jaiswal, JN
Saha, Sonali
Garg, Nishita
Chowdhary, Swati
Samadi, Fahad
Tripathi, Vandana Pandey
author_sort Samadi, Firoza
collection PubMed
description Aim: This study was undertaken to evaluate the percentage of gutta-percha-filled area (PGFA) using microscopic analysis of the cross-sections in the apical third of root canals when filled either with Thermafil technique, Warm Vertical Condensation technique and Cold Lateral Condensation technique without using sealers. Materials and methods: Sixty single rooted extracted per-manent teeth were collected. After crown amputation, the teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups of 20 specimens each. Group I–Thermafil obturation technique, group II–warm vertical condensation obturation technique and group III–cold lateral condensation obturation technique. Obturation was performed by specific techniques without using sealers. After obturation, the teeth were cross-sectioned horizontally at 2 to 3 mm from apex with the help of double sided diamond disk. Sections were digitally photographed and measured under Stereomicroscope at magnification of 50×. Using a KS 100 imaging system the area of canals and the gutta-percha was recorded, also the percentage of gutta-percha filled area (PGFA) was calculated. The observations thus ob-tained were subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA and student ‘t’ test. Results: Maximum group difference was observed between groups I and III (3.558 ± 0.138) while minimum difference was observed between groups I and II (1.223 ± 0.137). Thus, all the between group differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: This study supports the belief that the Thermafil Obturation technique produces significantly higher percentage of gutta-percha filled area (PGFA) than the warm vertical condensation technique or cold lateral condensation technique. How to cite this article: Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S, Garg N, Chowdhary S, Samadi F, Tripathi VP. A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(1):1-5.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4144066
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41440662014-09-09 A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study Samadi, Firoza Jaiswal, JN Saha, Sonali Garg, Nishita Chowdhary, Swati Samadi, Fahad Tripathi, Vandana Pandey Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article Aim: This study was undertaken to evaluate the percentage of gutta-percha-filled area (PGFA) using microscopic analysis of the cross-sections in the apical third of root canals when filled either with Thermafil technique, Warm Vertical Condensation technique and Cold Lateral Condensation technique without using sealers. Materials and methods: Sixty single rooted extracted per-manent teeth were collected. After crown amputation, the teeth were randomly divided into three experimental groups of 20 specimens each. Group I–Thermafil obturation technique, group II–warm vertical condensation obturation technique and group III–cold lateral condensation obturation technique. Obturation was performed by specific techniques without using sealers. After obturation, the teeth were cross-sectioned horizontally at 2 to 3 mm from apex with the help of double sided diamond disk. Sections were digitally photographed and measured under Stereomicroscope at magnification of 50×. Using a KS 100 imaging system the area of canals and the gutta-percha was recorded, also the percentage of gutta-percha filled area (PGFA) was calculated. The observations thus ob-tained were subjected to statistical analysis using ANOVA and student ‘t’ test. Results: Maximum group difference was observed between groups I and III (3.558 ± 0.138) while minimum difference was observed between groups I and II (1.223 ± 0.137). Thus, all the between group differences were statistically significant. Conclusion: This study supports the belief that the Thermafil Obturation technique produces significantly higher percentage of gutta-percha filled area (PGFA) than the warm vertical condensation technique or cold lateral condensation technique. How to cite this article: Samadi F, Jaiswal JN, Saha S, Garg N, Chowdhary S, Samadi F, Tripathi VP. A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2014;7(1):1-5. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2014 2014-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC4144066/ /pubmed/25206229 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1224 Text en Copyright © 2014; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Samadi, Firoza
Jaiswal, JN
Saha, Sonali
Garg, Nishita
Chowdhary, Swati
Samadi, Fahad
Tripathi, Vandana Pandey
A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Efficacy of Different Obturation Techniques used in Root Canal Treatment of Anterior Teeth: An in vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of efficacy of different obturation techniques used in root canal treatment of anterior teeth: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144066/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206229
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1224
work_keys_str_mv AT samadifiroza acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT jaiswaljn acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT sahasonali acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT gargnishita acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT chowdharyswati acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT samadifahad acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT tripathivandanapandey acomparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT samadifiroza comparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT jaiswaljn comparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT sahasonali comparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT gargnishita comparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT chowdharyswati comparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT samadifahad comparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy
AT tripathivandanapandey comparativeevaluationofefficacyofdifferentobturationtechniquesusedinrootcanaltreatmentofanteriorteethaninvitrostudy