Cargando…
Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey
OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of tooth number anomalies in a Turkish subpopulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population of 2722 patients (1532 females and 1190 males; mean age, 12.33 ± 2.5 years) was retrospectively examined to determine the prevalence and distri...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137641 |
_version_ | 1782332011599364096 |
---|---|
author | Karadas, Muhammet Celikoglu, Mevlut Akdag, Mustafa Sadik |
author_facet | Karadas, Muhammet Celikoglu, Mevlut Akdag, Mustafa Sadik |
author_sort | Karadas, Muhammet |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of tooth number anomalies in a Turkish subpopulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population of 2722 patients (1532 females and 1190 males; mean age, 12.33 ± 2.5 years) was retrospectively examined to determine the prevalence and distribution of the hypodontia, oligodontia, and hyperdontia using panoramic radiographs. All permanent teeth were investigated except thirds molars and the data obtained were recorded as unilateral (left or right) or bilateral according to gender. Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used for difference comparisons (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Permanent tooth anomalies were found in at least 132 (4.84%) of 2722 patients with no statistically difference between the genders, consists of 4.63% females and 5.12% males. Distribution of hyperdontia was statistically significant difference between genders, whereas distribution of hypodontia and oligodontia was no significant difference between genders. Hypodontia was the most frequently observed anomaly (3.67%), followed by hyperdontia (0.96%), and oligodontia (0.21%). Oligodontia and hypodontia were more frequent in females (3.98% and 0.26%, respectively), whereas hyperdontia was more frequently observed in males (1.68%). Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth (2.27%), while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of teeth number anomalies was 4.84% of dental patients. Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth, while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4144131 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41441312014-09-08 Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey Karadas, Muhammet Celikoglu, Mevlut Akdag, Mustafa Sadik Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of tooth number anomalies in a Turkish subpopulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population of 2722 patients (1532 females and 1190 males; mean age, 12.33 ± 2.5 years) was retrospectively examined to determine the prevalence and distribution of the hypodontia, oligodontia, and hyperdontia using panoramic radiographs. All permanent teeth were investigated except thirds molars and the data obtained were recorded as unilateral (left or right) or bilateral according to gender. Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used for difference comparisons (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Permanent tooth anomalies were found in at least 132 (4.84%) of 2722 patients with no statistically difference between the genders, consists of 4.63% females and 5.12% males. Distribution of hyperdontia was statistically significant difference between genders, whereas distribution of hypodontia and oligodontia was no significant difference between genders. Hypodontia was the most frequently observed anomaly (3.67%), followed by hyperdontia (0.96%), and oligodontia (0.21%). Oligodontia and hypodontia were more frequent in females (3.98% and 0.26%, respectively), whereas hyperdontia was more frequently observed in males (1.68%). Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth (2.27%), while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of teeth number anomalies was 4.84% of dental patients. Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth, while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4144131/ /pubmed/25202213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137641 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Karadas, Muhammet Celikoglu, Mevlut Akdag, Mustafa Sadik Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey |
title | Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey |
title_full | Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey |
title_short | Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey |
title_sort | evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the north-east of turkey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144131/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137641 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT karadasmuhammet evaluationoftoothnumberanomaliesinasubpopulationofthenortheastofturkey AT celikoglumevlut evaluationoftoothnumberanomaliesinasubpopulationofthenortheastofturkey AT akdagmustafasadik evaluationoftoothnumberanomaliesinasubpopulationofthenortheastofturkey |