Cargando…

Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey

OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of tooth number anomalies in a Turkish subpopulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population of 2722 patients (1532 females and 1190 males; mean age, 12.33 ± 2.5 years) was retrospectively examined to determine the prevalence and distri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karadas, Muhammet, Celikoglu, Mevlut, Akdag, Mustafa Sadik
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202213
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137641
_version_ 1782332011599364096
author Karadas, Muhammet
Celikoglu, Mevlut
Akdag, Mustafa Sadik
author_facet Karadas, Muhammet
Celikoglu, Mevlut
Akdag, Mustafa Sadik
author_sort Karadas, Muhammet
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of tooth number anomalies in a Turkish subpopulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population of 2722 patients (1532 females and 1190 males; mean age, 12.33 ± 2.5 years) was retrospectively examined to determine the prevalence and distribution of the hypodontia, oligodontia, and hyperdontia using panoramic radiographs. All permanent teeth were investigated except thirds molars and the data obtained were recorded as unilateral (left or right) or bilateral according to gender. Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used for difference comparisons (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Permanent tooth anomalies were found in at least 132 (4.84%) of 2722 patients with no statistically difference between the genders, consists of 4.63% females and 5.12% males. Distribution of hyperdontia was statistically significant difference between genders, whereas distribution of hypodontia and oligodontia was no significant difference between genders. Hypodontia was the most frequently observed anomaly (3.67%), followed by hyperdontia (0.96%), and oligodontia (0.21%). Oligodontia and hypodontia were more frequent in females (3.98% and 0.26%, respectively), whereas hyperdontia was more frequently observed in males (1.68%). Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth (2.27%), while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of teeth number anomalies was 4.84% of dental patients. Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth, while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4144131
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41441312014-09-08 Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey Karadas, Muhammet Celikoglu, Mevlut Akdag, Mustafa Sadik Eur J Dent Original Article OBJECTIVE: The aim was to evaluate the prevalence and distribution of tooth number anomalies in a Turkish subpopulation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A population of 2722 patients (1532 females and 1190 males; mean age, 12.33 ± 2.5 years) was retrospectively examined to determine the prevalence and distribution of the hypodontia, oligodontia, and hyperdontia using panoramic radiographs. All permanent teeth were investigated except thirds molars and the data obtained were recorded as unilateral (left or right) or bilateral according to gender. Pearson's Chi-squared and Fisher exact tests were used for difference comparisons (P < 0.05). RESULTS: Permanent tooth anomalies were found in at least 132 (4.84%) of 2722 patients with no statistically difference between the genders, consists of 4.63% females and 5.12% males. Distribution of hyperdontia was statistically significant difference between genders, whereas distribution of hypodontia and oligodontia was no significant difference between genders. Hypodontia was the most frequently observed anomaly (3.67%), followed by hyperdontia (0.96%), and oligodontia (0.21%). Oligodontia and hypodontia were more frequent in females (3.98% and 0.26%, respectively), whereas hyperdontia was more frequently observed in males (1.68%). Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth (2.27%), while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of teeth number anomalies was 4.84% of dental patients. Maxillary lateral incisors were most common missing teeth, while the frequency of hyperdontia was most common in premolars. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4144131/ /pubmed/25202213 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137641 Text en Copyright: © European Journal of Dentistry http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Karadas, Muhammet
Celikoglu, Mevlut
Akdag, Mustafa Sadik
Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey
title Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey
title_full Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey
title_fullStr Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey
title_short Evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the North-East of Turkey
title_sort evaluation of tooth number anomalies in a subpopulation of the north-east of turkey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4144131/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202213
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1305-7456.137641
work_keys_str_mv AT karadasmuhammet evaluationoftoothnumberanomaliesinasubpopulationofthenortheastofturkey
AT celikoglumevlut evaluationoftoothnumberanomaliesinasubpopulationofthenortheastofturkey
AT akdagmustafasadik evaluationoftoothnumberanomaliesinasubpopulationofthenortheastofturkey