Cargando…
Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at Eastern Nepal
INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernias have been treated traditionally with open methods of herniorrhaphy or hernioplasty. But the trends have changed in the last decade with the introduction of minimal access surgery. METHODS: This study was a prospective descriptive study in patients presenting to Surgery...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The African Field Epidemiology Network
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170385 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.241.2610 |
_version_ | 1782332141285146624 |
---|---|
author | Shakya, Vikal Chandra Sood, Shasank Bhattarai, Bal Krishna Agrawal, Chandra Shekhar Adhikary, Shailesh |
author_facet | Shakya, Vikal Chandra Sood, Shasank Bhattarai, Bal Krishna Agrawal, Chandra Shekhar Adhikary, Shailesh |
author_sort | Shakya, Vikal Chandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernias have been treated traditionally with open methods of herniorrhaphy or hernioplasty. But the trends have changed in the last decade with the introduction of minimal access surgery. METHODS: This study was a prospective descriptive study in patients presenting to Surgery Department of B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal with reducible inguinal hernias from January 2011 to June 2012. All patients >18 years of age presenting with inguinal hernias were given the choice of laparoscopic repair or open repair. Those who opted for laparoscopic repair were included in the study. RESULTS: There were 50 patients, age ranged from 18 to 71 years with 34 being median age at presentation. In 41 patients, totally extraperitoneal repair was attempted. Of these, 2 (4%) repairs were converted to transabdominal repair and 2 to open mesh repair (4%). In 9 patients, transabdominal repair was done. The median total hospital stay was 4 days (range 3-32 days), the mean postoperative stay was 3.38±3.14 days (range 2-23 days), average time taken for full ambulation postoperatively was 2.05±1.39 days (range 1-10 days), and median time taken to return for normal activity was 5 days (range 2-50 days). One patient developed recurrence (2%). None of the patients who had laparoscopic repair completed complained of neuralgias in the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias could be contemplated safely both via totally extra peritoneal as well as transperitoneal route even in our setup of a developing country with modifications. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4145269 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The African Field Epidemiology Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41452692014-08-28 Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at Eastern Nepal Shakya, Vikal Chandra Sood, Shasank Bhattarai, Bal Krishna Agrawal, Chandra Shekhar Adhikary, Shailesh Pan Afr Med J Research INTRODUCTION: Inguinal hernias have been treated traditionally with open methods of herniorrhaphy or hernioplasty. But the trends have changed in the last decade with the introduction of minimal access surgery. METHODS: This study was a prospective descriptive study in patients presenting to Surgery Department of B. P. Koirala Institute of Health Sciences, Dharan, Nepal with reducible inguinal hernias from January 2011 to June 2012. All patients >18 years of age presenting with inguinal hernias were given the choice of laparoscopic repair or open repair. Those who opted for laparoscopic repair were included in the study. RESULTS: There were 50 patients, age ranged from 18 to 71 years with 34 being median age at presentation. In 41 patients, totally extraperitoneal repair was attempted. Of these, 2 (4%) repairs were converted to transabdominal repair and 2 to open mesh repair (4%). In 9 patients, transabdominal repair was done. The median total hospital stay was 4 days (range 3-32 days), the mean postoperative stay was 3.38±3.14 days (range 2-23 days), average time taken for full ambulation postoperatively was 2.05±1.39 days (range 1-10 days), and median time taken to return for normal activity was 5 days (range 2-50 days). One patient developed recurrence (2%). None of the patients who had laparoscopic repair completed complained of neuralgias in the follow-up. CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias could be contemplated safely both via totally extra peritoneal as well as transperitoneal route even in our setup of a developing country with modifications. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2014-03-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4145269/ /pubmed/25170385 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.241.2610 Text en © Vikal Chandra Shakya et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Shakya, Vikal Chandra Sood, Shasank Bhattarai, Bal Krishna Agrawal, Chandra Shekhar Adhikary, Shailesh Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at Eastern Nepal |
title | Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at Eastern Nepal |
title_full | Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at Eastern Nepal |
title_fullStr | Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at Eastern Nepal |
title_full_unstemmed | Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at Eastern Nepal |
title_short | Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at Eastern Nepal |
title_sort | laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a prospective evaluation at eastern nepal |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145269/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170385 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.241.2610 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT shakyavikalchandra laparoscopicinguinalherniarepairaprospectiveevaluationateasternnepal AT soodshasank laparoscopicinguinalherniarepairaprospectiveevaluationateasternnepal AT bhattaraibalkrishna laparoscopicinguinalherniarepairaprospectiveevaluationateasternnepal AT agrawalchandrashekhar laparoscopicinguinalherniarepairaprospectiveevaluationateasternnepal AT adhikaryshailesh laparoscopicinguinalherniarepairaprospectiveevaluationateasternnepal |