Cargando…

Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04

AIMS: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-04 sought to identify women with ‘good risk’ ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who receive no significant benefit from radiation. Enrolment criteria excluded close or positive margins and grade 3 disease. To ensure reproducibility in identifying good risk path...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Woodward, Wendy A, Sneige, Nour, Winter, Kathryn, Kuerer, Henry Mark, Hudis, Clifford, Rakovitch, Eileen, Smith, Barbara L, Pierce, Lori J, Germano, Isabelle, Pu, Anthony T, Walker, Eleanor M, Grisell, David Lawrence, White, Julia R, McCormick, Beryl
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24989024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202370
_version_ 1782332171640373248
author Woodward, Wendy A
Sneige, Nour
Winter, Kathryn
Kuerer, Henry Mark
Hudis, Clifford
Rakovitch, Eileen
Smith, Barbara L
Pierce, Lori J
Germano, Isabelle
Pu, Anthony T
Walker, Eleanor M
Grisell, David Lawrence
White, Julia R
McCormick, Beryl
author_facet Woodward, Wendy A
Sneige, Nour
Winter, Kathryn
Kuerer, Henry Mark
Hudis, Clifford
Rakovitch, Eileen
Smith, Barbara L
Pierce, Lori J
Germano, Isabelle
Pu, Anthony T
Walker, Eleanor M
Grisell, David Lawrence
White, Julia R
McCormick, Beryl
author_sort Woodward, Wendy A
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-04 sought to identify women with ‘good risk’ ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who receive no significant benefit from radiation. Enrolment criteria excluded close or positive margins and grade 3 disease. To ensure reproducibility in identifying good risk pathology, an optional web based teaching tool was developed and a random sampling of 10% of submitted slides were reviewed by a central pathologist. METHODS: Submitting pathologists were asked to use the web based teaching tool and submit an assessment of the tool along with the pathology specimen form and DCIS H&E stained slide. Per protocol pathology was centrally reviewed for 10% of the cases. RESULTS: Of the 55 DCIS cases reviewed, three had close or positive margins and three were assessed to include grade 3 DCIS, therefore 95% of DCIS cases reviewed were correctly graded, and 89% reviewed were pathologically appropriate for enrolment. Regarding the teaching tool, 13% of DCIS cases included forms that indicated the website was used. One of these seven who used the website submitted DCIS of grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: Central review demonstrates high pathological concordance with enrolment eligibility, particularly with regard to accurate grading. The teaching tool appeared to be underused.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4145412
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41454122014-09-02 Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04 Woodward, Wendy A Sneige, Nour Winter, Kathryn Kuerer, Henry Mark Hudis, Clifford Rakovitch, Eileen Smith, Barbara L Pierce, Lori J Germano, Isabelle Pu, Anthony T Walker, Eleanor M Grisell, David Lawrence White, Julia R McCormick, Beryl J Clin Pathol Original Article AIMS: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-04 sought to identify women with ‘good risk’ ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who receive no significant benefit from radiation. Enrolment criteria excluded close or positive margins and grade 3 disease. To ensure reproducibility in identifying good risk pathology, an optional web based teaching tool was developed and a random sampling of 10% of submitted slides were reviewed by a central pathologist. METHODS: Submitting pathologists were asked to use the web based teaching tool and submit an assessment of the tool along with the pathology specimen form and DCIS H&E stained slide. Per protocol pathology was centrally reviewed for 10% of the cases. RESULTS: Of the 55 DCIS cases reviewed, three had close or positive margins and three were assessed to include grade 3 DCIS, therefore 95% of DCIS cases reviewed were correctly graded, and 89% reviewed were pathologically appropriate for enrolment. Regarding the teaching tool, 13% of DCIS cases included forms that indicated the website was used. One of these seven who used the website submitted DCIS of grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: Central review demonstrates high pathological concordance with enrolment eligibility, particularly with regard to accurate grading. The teaching tool appeared to be underused. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09 2014-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4145412/ /pubmed/24989024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202370 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Original Article
Woodward, Wendy A
Sneige, Nour
Winter, Kathryn
Kuerer, Henry Mark
Hudis, Clifford
Rakovitch, Eileen
Smith, Barbara L
Pierce, Lori J
Germano, Isabelle
Pu, Anthony T
Walker, Eleanor M
Grisell, David Lawrence
White, Julia R
McCormick, Beryl
Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04
title Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04
title_full Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04
title_fullStr Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04
title_full_unstemmed Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04
title_short Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04
title_sort web based pathology assessment in rtog 98-04
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24989024
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202370
work_keys_str_mv AT woodwardwendya webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT sneigenour webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT winterkathryn webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT kuererhenrymark webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT hudisclifford webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT rakovitcheileen webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT smithbarbaral webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT piercelorij webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT germanoisabelle webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT puanthonyt webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT walkereleanorm webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT griselldavidlawrence webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT whitejuliar webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804
AT mccormickberyl webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804