Cargando…
Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04
AIMS: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-04 sought to identify women with ‘good risk’ ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who receive no significant benefit from radiation. Enrolment criteria excluded close or positive margins and grade 3 disease. To ensure reproducibility in identifying good risk path...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24989024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202370 |
_version_ | 1782332171640373248 |
---|---|
author | Woodward, Wendy A Sneige, Nour Winter, Kathryn Kuerer, Henry Mark Hudis, Clifford Rakovitch, Eileen Smith, Barbara L Pierce, Lori J Germano, Isabelle Pu, Anthony T Walker, Eleanor M Grisell, David Lawrence White, Julia R McCormick, Beryl |
author_facet | Woodward, Wendy A Sneige, Nour Winter, Kathryn Kuerer, Henry Mark Hudis, Clifford Rakovitch, Eileen Smith, Barbara L Pierce, Lori J Germano, Isabelle Pu, Anthony T Walker, Eleanor M Grisell, David Lawrence White, Julia R McCormick, Beryl |
author_sort | Woodward, Wendy A |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-04 sought to identify women with ‘good risk’ ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who receive no significant benefit from radiation. Enrolment criteria excluded close or positive margins and grade 3 disease. To ensure reproducibility in identifying good risk pathology, an optional web based teaching tool was developed and a random sampling of 10% of submitted slides were reviewed by a central pathologist. METHODS: Submitting pathologists were asked to use the web based teaching tool and submit an assessment of the tool along with the pathology specimen form and DCIS H&E stained slide. Per protocol pathology was centrally reviewed for 10% of the cases. RESULTS: Of the 55 DCIS cases reviewed, three had close or positive margins and three were assessed to include grade 3 DCIS, therefore 95% of DCIS cases reviewed were correctly graded, and 89% reviewed were pathologically appropriate for enrolment. Regarding the teaching tool, 13% of DCIS cases included forms that indicated the website was used. One of these seven who used the website submitted DCIS of grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: Central review demonstrates high pathological concordance with enrolment eligibility, particularly with regard to accurate grading. The teaching tool appeared to be underused. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4145412 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41454122014-09-02 Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04 Woodward, Wendy A Sneige, Nour Winter, Kathryn Kuerer, Henry Mark Hudis, Clifford Rakovitch, Eileen Smith, Barbara L Pierce, Lori J Germano, Isabelle Pu, Anthony T Walker, Eleanor M Grisell, David Lawrence White, Julia R McCormick, Beryl J Clin Pathol Original Article AIMS: Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 98-04 sought to identify women with ‘good risk’ ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) who receive no significant benefit from radiation. Enrolment criteria excluded close or positive margins and grade 3 disease. To ensure reproducibility in identifying good risk pathology, an optional web based teaching tool was developed and a random sampling of 10% of submitted slides were reviewed by a central pathologist. METHODS: Submitting pathologists were asked to use the web based teaching tool and submit an assessment of the tool along with the pathology specimen form and DCIS H&E stained slide. Per protocol pathology was centrally reviewed for 10% of the cases. RESULTS: Of the 55 DCIS cases reviewed, three had close or positive margins and three were assessed to include grade 3 DCIS, therefore 95% of DCIS cases reviewed were correctly graded, and 89% reviewed were pathologically appropriate for enrolment. Regarding the teaching tool, 13% of DCIS cases included forms that indicated the website was used. One of these seven who used the website submitted DCIS of grade 3. CONCLUSIONS: Central review demonstrates high pathological concordance with enrolment eligibility, particularly with regard to accurate grading. The teaching tool appeared to be underused. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-09 2014-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4145412/ /pubmed/24989024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202370 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Article Woodward, Wendy A Sneige, Nour Winter, Kathryn Kuerer, Henry Mark Hudis, Clifford Rakovitch, Eileen Smith, Barbara L Pierce, Lori J Germano, Isabelle Pu, Anthony T Walker, Eleanor M Grisell, David Lawrence White, Julia R McCormick, Beryl Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04 |
title | Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04 |
title_full | Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04 |
title_fullStr | Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04 |
title_full_unstemmed | Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04 |
title_short | Web based pathology assessment in RTOG 98-04 |
title_sort | web based pathology assessment in rtog 98-04 |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145412/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24989024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jclinpath-2014-202370 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT woodwardwendya webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT sneigenour webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT winterkathryn webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT kuererhenrymark webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT hudisclifford webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT rakovitcheileen webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT smithbarbaral webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT piercelorij webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT germanoisabelle webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT puanthonyt webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT walkereleanorm webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT griselldavidlawrence webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT whitejuliar webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 AT mccormickberyl webbasedpathologyassessmentinrtog9804 |