Cargando…

Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content

It is unclear why and under what circumstances working memory (WM) and attention interact. Here, we apply the logic of the time-based resource-sharing (TBRS) model of WM (e.g., Barrouillet et al., 2004) to explore the mixed findings of a separate, but related, literature that studies the guidance of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiyonaga, Anastasia, Egner, Tobias
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25221499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00670
_version_ 1782332177141202944
author Kiyonaga, Anastasia
Egner, Tobias
author_facet Kiyonaga, Anastasia
Egner, Tobias
author_sort Kiyonaga, Anastasia
collection PubMed
description It is unclear why and under what circumstances working memory (WM) and attention interact. Here, we apply the logic of the time-based resource-sharing (TBRS) model of WM (e.g., Barrouillet et al., 2004) to explore the mixed findings of a separate, but related, literature that studies the guidance of visual attention by WM contents. Specifically, we hypothesize that the linkage between WM representations and visual attention is governed by a time-shared cognitive resource that alternately refreshes internal (WM) and selects external (visual attention) information. If this were the case, WM content should guide visual attention (involuntarily), but only when there is time for it to be refreshed in an internal focus of attention. To provide an initial test for this hypothesis, we examined whether the amount of unoccupied time during a WM delay could impact the magnitude of attentional capture by WM contents. Participants were presented with a series of visual search trials while they maintained a WM cue for a delayed-recognition test. WM cues could coincide with the search target, a distracter, or neither. We varied both the number of searches to be performed, and the amount of available time to perform them. Slowing of visual search by a WM matching distracter—and facilitation by a matching target—were curtailed when the delay was filled with fast-paced (refreshing-preventing) search trials, as was subsequent memory probe accuracy. WM content may, therefore, only capture visual attention when it can be refreshed, suggesting that internal (WM) and external attention demands reciprocally impact one another because they share a limited resource. The TBRS rationale can thus be applied in a novel context to explain why WM contents capture attention, and under what conditions that effect should be observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4145435
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41454352014-09-12 Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content Kiyonaga, Anastasia Egner, Tobias Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience It is unclear why and under what circumstances working memory (WM) and attention interact. Here, we apply the logic of the time-based resource-sharing (TBRS) model of WM (e.g., Barrouillet et al., 2004) to explore the mixed findings of a separate, but related, literature that studies the guidance of visual attention by WM contents. Specifically, we hypothesize that the linkage between WM representations and visual attention is governed by a time-shared cognitive resource that alternately refreshes internal (WM) and selects external (visual attention) information. If this were the case, WM content should guide visual attention (involuntarily), but only when there is time for it to be refreshed in an internal focus of attention. To provide an initial test for this hypothesis, we examined whether the amount of unoccupied time during a WM delay could impact the magnitude of attentional capture by WM contents. Participants were presented with a series of visual search trials while they maintained a WM cue for a delayed-recognition test. WM cues could coincide with the search target, a distracter, or neither. We varied both the number of searches to be performed, and the amount of available time to perform them. Slowing of visual search by a WM matching distracter—and facilitation by a matching target—were curtailed when the delay was filled with fast-paced (refreshing-preventing) search trials, as was subsequent memory probe accuracy. WM content may, therefore, only capture visual attention when it can be refreshed, suggesting that internal (WM) and external attention demands reciprocally impact one another because they share a limited resource. The TBRS rationale can thus be applied in a novel context to explain why WM contents capture attention, and under what conditions that effect should be observed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4145435/ /pubmed/25221499 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00670 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kiyonaga and Egner. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Kiyonaga, Anastasia
Egner, Tobias
Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content
title Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content
title_full Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content
title_fullStr Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content
title_full_unstemmed Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content
title_short Resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content
title_sort resource-sharing between internal maintenance and external selection modulates attentional capture by working memory content
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145435/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25221499
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2014.00670
work_keys_str_mv AT kiyonagaanastasia resourcesharingbetweeninternalmaintenanceandexternalselectionmodulatesattentionalcapturebyworkingmemorycontent
AT egnertobias resourcesharingbetweeninternalmaintenanceandexternalselectionmodulatesattentionalcapturebyworkingmemorycontent