Cargando…

LH Pretreatment as a Novel Strategy for Poor Responders

Introduction. Poor response to ovarian stimulation is still a major problem in IVF. The study presents a new stimulation protocol evaluated in a suppopulation of very difficult young poor ovarian responders. Material and Methods. The study consists in two sections. The first includes data from a ran...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferraretti, Anna Pia, Gianaroli, Luca, Motrenko, Tatiana, Feliciani, Elisabetta, Tabanelli, Carla, Magli, Maria Cristina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25197669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/926172
_version_ 1782332200603090944
author Ferraretti, Anna Pia
Gianaroli, Luca
Motrenko, Tatiana
Feliciani, Elisabetta
Tabanelli, Carla
Magli, Maria Cristina
author_facet Ferraretti, Anna Pia
Gianaroli, Luca
Motrenko, Tatiana
Feliciani, Elisabetta
Tabanelli, Carla
Magli, Maria Cristina
author_sort Ferraretti, Anna Pia
collection PubMed
description Introduction. Poor response to ovarian stimulation is still a major problem in IVF. The study presents a new stimulation protocol evaluated in a suppopulation of very difficult young poor ovarian responders. Material and Methods. The study consists in two sections. The first includes data from a randomized controlled study involving forty-three young patients with a poor ovarian response in at least two previous cycles (intended as cycle cancellation or with ≤3 collected oocytes). Patients were randomized in two groups: group A (control) received FSH (400 IU/day), while group B received the new stimulation protocol consisting in a sequential association of 150 IU r-LH for 4 days followed by 400 IU r-FSH/after downregulation with daily GnRh agonist. The second includes data from the overall results in 65 patients treated with the new protocol compared to their previous performance with conventional cycles (historical control). Results. Both in the RCT and in the historical control study, LH pretreatment was able to decrease the cancellation rate, to improve the in vitro performance, and to significantly increase the live birth rates. Conclusions. LH pretreatment improved oocyte quantity and quality in young repeated poor responders selected in accordance with the Bologna criteria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4145542
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41455422014-09-07 LH Pretreatment as a Novel Strategy for Poor Responders Ferraretti, Anna Pia Gianaroli, Luca Motrenko, Tatiana Feliciani, Elisabetta Tabanelli, Carla Magli, Maria Cristina Biomed Res Int Clinical Study Introduction. Poor response to ovarian stimulation is still a major problem in IVF. The study presents a new stimulation protocol evaluated in a suppopulation of very difficult young poor ovarian responders. Material and Methods. The study consists in two sections. The first includes data from a randomized controlled study involving forty-three young patients with a poor ovarian response in at least two previous cycles (intended as cycle cancellation or with ≤3 collected oocytes). Patients were randomized in two groups: group A (control) received FSH (400 IU/day), while group B received the new stimulation protocol consisting in a sequential association of 150 IU r-LH for 4 days followed by 400 IU r-FSH/after downregulation with daily GnRh agonist. The second includes data from the overall results in 65 patients treated with the new protocol compared to their previous performance with conventional cycles (historical control). Results. Both in the RCT and in the historical control study, LH pretreatment was able to decrease the cancellation rate, to improve the in vitro performance, and to significantly increase the live birth rates. Conclusions. LH pretreatment improved oocyte quantity and quality in young repeated poor responders selected in accordance with the Bologna criteria. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-08-12 /pmc/articles/PMC4145542/ /pubmed/25197669 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/926172 Text en Copyright © 2014 Anna Pia Ferraretti et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Ferraretti, Anna Pia
Gianaroli, Luca
Motrenko, Tatiana
Feliciani, Elisabetta
Tabanelli, Carla
Magli, Maria Cristina
LH Pretreatment as a Novel Strategy for Poor Responders
title LH Pretreatment as a Novel Strategy for Poor Responders
title_full LH Pretreatment as a Novel Strategy for Poor Responders
title_fullStr LH Pretreatment as a Novel Strategy for Poor Responders
title_full_unstemmed LH Pretreatment as a Novel Strategy for Poor Responders
title_short LH Pretreatment as a Novel Strategy for Poor Responders
title_sort lh pretreatment as a novel strategy for poor responders
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145542/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25197669
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/926172
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrarettiannapia lhpretreatmentasanovelstrategyforpoorresponders
AT gianaroliluca lhpretreatmentasanovelstrategyforpoorresponders
AT motrenkotatiana lhpretreatmentasanovelstrategyforpoorresponders
AT felicianielisabetta lhpretreatmentasanovelstrategyforpoorresponders
AT tabanellicarla lhpretreatmentasanovelstrategyforpoorresponders
AT maglimariacristina lhpretreatmentasanovelstrategyforpoorresponders