Cargando…

Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery?

Negative motor evoked potentials after cerebral infarction, indicative of poor recovery of limb motor function, tend to be accompanied by changes in fractional anisotropy values and the cerebral peduncle area on the affected side, but the characteristics of these changes have not been reported. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Song, Zhibin, Dang, Lijuan, Zhou, Yanling, Dong, Yanjiang, Liang, Haimao, Zhu, Zhengfeng, Pan, Suyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.29.003
_version_ 1782332258804301824
author Song, Zhibin
Dang, Lijuan
Zhou, Yanling
Dong, Yanjiang
Liang, Haimao
Zhu, Zhengfeng
Pan, Suyue
author_facet Song, Zhibin
Dang, Lijuan
Zhou, Yanling
Dong, Yanjiang
Liang, Haimao
Zhu, Zhengfeng
Pan, Suyue
author_sort Song, Zhibin
collection PubMed
description Negative motor evoked potentials after cerebral infarction, indicative of poor recovery of limb motor function, tend to be accompanied by changes in fractional anisotropy values and the cerebral peduncle area on the affected side, but the characteristics of these changes have not been reported. This study included 57 cases of cerebral infarction whose motor evoked potentials were tested in the 24 hours after the first inspection for diffusion tensor imaging, in which 29 cases were in the negative group and 28 cases in the positive group. Twenty-nine patients with negative motor evoked potentials were divided into two groups according to fractional anisotropy on the affected side of the cerebral peduncle: a fractional anisotropy < 0.36 group and a fractional anisotropy ≥ 0.36 group. All patients underwent a regular magnetic resonance imaging and a diffusion tensor imaging examination at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after cerebral infarction. The Fugl-Meyer scores of their hemiplegic limbs were tested before the magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging tions. In the negative motor evoked potential group, fractional anisotropy in the affected cerebral peduncle declined progressively, which was most obvious in the first 1–3 months after the onset of cerebral infarction. The areas and area asymmetries of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side were significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months after onset. At 12 months after onset, the area asymmetries of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side were lower than the normal lower limit value of 0.83. Fugl-Meyer scores in the fractional anisotropy ≥ 0.36 group were significantly higher than in the fractional anisotropy < 0.36 group at 3–12 months after onset. The fractional anisotropy of the cerebral peduncle in the positive motor evoked potential group decreased in the first 1 month after onset, and stayed unchanged from 3–12 months; there was no change in the area of the cerebral peduncle in the first 1–12 months after cerebral infarction. These findings confirmed that if the fractional anisotropy of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side is < 0.36 and the area asymmetries < 0.83 in patients with negative motor evoked potential after cerebral infarction, then poor hemiplegic limb motor function recovery may occur.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4145996
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41459962014-09-09 Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery? Song, Zhibin Dang, Lijuan Zhou, Yanling Dong, Yanjiang Liang, Haimao Zhu, Zhengfeng Pan, Suyue Neural Regen Res Research and Report Article: Brain Injury and Neural Regeneration Negative motor evoked potentials after cerebral infarction, indicative of poor recovery of limb motor function, tend to be accompanied by changes in fractional anisotropy values and the cerebral peduncle area on the affected side, but the characteristics of these changes have not been reported. This study included 57 cases of cerebral infarction whose motor evoked potentials were tested in the 24 hours after the first inspection for diffusion tensor imaging, in which 29 cases were in the negative group and 28 cases in the positive group. Twenty-nine patients with negative motor evoked potentials were divided into two groups according to fractional anisotropy on the affected side of the cerebral peduncle: a fractional anisotropy < 0.36 group and a fractional anisotropy ≥ 0.36 group. All patients underwent a regular magnetic resonance imaging and a diffusion tensor imaging examination at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after cerebral infarction. The Fugl-Meyer scores of their hemiplegic limbs were tested before the magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging tions. In the negative motor evoked potential group, fractional anisotropy in the affected cerebral peduncle declined progressively, which was most obvious in the first 1–3 months after the onset of cerebral infarction. The areas and area asymmetries of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side were significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months after onset. At 12 months after onset, the area asymmetries of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side were lower than the normal lower limit value of 0.83. Fugl-Meyer scores in the fractional anisotropy ≥ 0.36 group were significantly higher than in the fractional anisotropy < 0.36 group at 3–12 months after onset. The fractional anisotropy of the cerebral peduncle in the positive motor evoked potential group decreased in the first 1 month after onset, and stayed unchanged from 3–12 months; there was no change in the area of the cerebral peduncle in the first 1–12 months after cerebral infarction. These findings confirmed that if the fractional anisotropy of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side is < 0.36 and the area asymmetries < 0.83 in patients with negative motor evoked potential after cerebral infarction, then poor hemiplegic limb motor function recovery may occur. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4145996/ /pubmed/25206582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.29.003 Text en Copyright: © Neural Regeneration Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research and Report Article: Brain Injury and Neural Regeneration
Song, Zhibin
Dang, Lijuan
Zhou, Yanling
Dong, Yanjiang
Liang, Haimao
Zhu, Zhengfeng
Pan, Suyue
Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery?
title Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery?
title_full Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery?
title_fullStr Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery?
title_full_unstemmed Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery?
title_short Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery?
title_sort why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery?
topic Research and Report Article: Brain Injury and Neural Regeneration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145996/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206582
http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.29.003
work_keys_str_mv AT songzhibin whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery
AT danglijuan whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery
AT zhouyanling whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery
AT dongyanjiang whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery
AT lianghaimao whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery
AT zhuzhengfeng whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery
AT pansuyue whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery