Cargando…
Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery?
Negative motor evoked potentials after cerebral infarction, indicative of poor recovery of limb motor function, tend to be accompanied by changes in fractional anisotropy values and the cerebral peduncle area on the affected side, but the characteristics of these changes have not been reported. This...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.29.003 |
_version_ | 1782332258804301824 |
---|---|
author | Song, Zhibin Dang, Lijuan Zhou, Yanling Dong, Yanjiang Liang, Haimao Zhu, Zhengfeng Pan, Suyue |
author_facet | Song, Zhibin Dang, Lijuan Zhou, Yanling Dong, Yanjiang Liang, Haimao Zhu, Zhengfeng Pan, Suyue |
author_sort | Song, Zhibin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Negative motor evoked potentials after cerebral infarction, indicative of poor recovery of limb motor function, tend to be accompanied by changes in fractional anisotropy values and the cerebral peduncle area on the affected side, but the characteristics of these changes have not been reported. This study included 57 cases of cerebral infarction whose motor evoked potentials were tested in the 24 hours after the first inspection for diffusion tensor imaging, in which 29 cases were in the negative group and 28 cases in the positive group. Twenty-nine patients with negative motor evoked potentials were divided into two groups according to fractional anisotropy on the affected side of the cerebral peduncle: a fractional anisotropy < 0.36 group and a fractional anisotropy ≥ 0.36 group. All patients underwent a regular magnetic resonance imaging and a diffusion tensor imaging examination at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after cerebral infarction. The Fugl-Meyer scores of their hemiplegic limbs were tested before the magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging tions. In the negative motor evoked potential group, fractional anisotropy in the affected cerebral peduncle declined progressively, which was most obvious in the first 1–3 months after the onset of cerebral infarction. The areas and area asymmetries of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side were significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months after onset. At 12 months after onset, the area asymmetries of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side were lower than the normal lower limit value of 0.83. Fugl-Meyer scores in the fractional anisotropy ≥ 0.36 group were significantly higher than in the fractional anisotropy < 0.36 group at 3–12 months after onset. The fractional anisotropy of the cerebral peduncle in the positive motor evoked potential group decreased in the first 1 month after onset, and stayed unchanged from 3–12 months; there was no change in the area of the cerebral peduncle in the first 1–12 months after cerebral infarction. These findings confirmed that if the fractional anisotropy of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side is < 0.36 and the area asymmetries < 0.83 in patients with negative motor evoked potential after cerebral infarction, then poor hemiplegic limb motor function recovery may occur. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4145996 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41459962014-09-09 Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery? Song, Zhibin Dang, Lijuan Zhou, Yanling Dong, Yanjiang Liang, Haimao Zhu, Zhengfeng Pan, Suyue Neural Regen Res Research and Report Article: Brain Injury and Neural Regeneration Negative motor evoked potentials after cerebral infarction, indicative of poor recovery of limb motor function, tend to be accompanied by changes in fractional anisotropy values and the cerebral peduncle area on the affected side, but the characteristics of these changes have not been reported. This study included 57 cases of cerebral infarction whose motor evoked potentials were tested in the 24 hours after the first inspection for diffusion tensor imaging, in which 29 cases were in the negative group and 28 cases in the positive group. Twenty-nine patients with negative motor evoked potentials were divided into two groups according to fractional anisotropy on the affected side of the cerebral peduncle: a fractional anisotropy < 0.36 group and a fractional anisotropy ≥ 0.36 group. All patients underwent a regular magnetic resonance imaging and a diffusion tensor imaging examination at 1 week, 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after cerebral infarction. The Fugl-Meyer scores of their hemiplegic limbs were tested before the magnetic resonance and diffusion tensor imaging tions. In the negative motor evoked potential group, fractional anisotropy in the affected cerebral peduncle declined progressively, which was most obvious in the first 1–3 months after the onset of cerebral infarction. The areas and area asymmetries of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side were significantly decreased at 6 and 12 months after onset. At 12 months after onset, the area asymmetries of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side were lower than the normal lower limit value of 0.83. Fugl-Meyer scores in the fractional anisotropy ≥ 0.36 group were significantly higher than in the fractional anisotropy < 0.36 group at 3–12 months after onset. The fractional anisotropy of the cerebral peduncle in the positive motor evoked potential group decreased in the first 1 month after onset, and stayed unchanged from 3–12 months; there was no change in the area of the cerebral peduncle in the first 1–12 months after cerebral infarction. These findings confirmed that if the fractional anisotropy of the cerebral peduncle on the affected side is < 0.36 and the area asymmetries < 0.83 in patients with negative motor evoked potential after cerebral infarction, then poor hemiplegic limb motor function recovery may occur. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2013-10-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4145996/ /pubmed/25206582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.29.003 Text en Copyright: © Neural Regeneration Research http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research and Report Article: Brain Injury and Neural Regeneration Song, Zhibin Dang, Lijuan Zhou, Yanling Dong, Yanjiang Liang, Haimao Zhu, Zhengfeng Pan, Suyue Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery? |
title | Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery? |
title_full | Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery? |
title_fullStr | Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery? |
title_full_unstemmed | Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery? |
title_short | Why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery? |
title_sort | why do stroke patients with negative motor evoked potential show poor limb motor function recovery? |
topic | Research and Report Article: Brain Injury and Neural Regeneration |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4145996/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206582 http://dx.doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1673-5374.2013.29.003 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT songzhibin whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery AT danglijuan whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery AT zhouyanling whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery AT dongyanjiang whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery AT lianghaimao whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery AT zhuzhengfeng whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery AT pansuyue whydostrokepatientswithnegativemotorevokedpotentialshowpoorlimbmotorfunctionrecovery |