Cargando…
Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial
BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common postsurgical complications. Palonosetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist, is effective for PONV prevention. Herein, we compared palonosetron and aprepitant (a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) for PONV preventi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4146452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-68 |
_version_ | 1782332344864079872 |
---|---|
author | Moon, Hyoung Yong Baek, Chong Wha Choi, Geun Joo Shin, Hwa Yong Kang, Hyun Jung, Yong Hun Woo, Young Cheol Kim, Jin Yun Park, Seul Gi |
author_facet | Moon, Hyoung Yong Baek, Chong Wha Choi, Geun Joo Shin, Hwa Yong Kang, Hyun Jung, Yong Hun Woo, Young Cheol Kim, Jin Yun Park, Seul Gi |
author_sort | Moon, Hyoung Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common postsurgical complications. Palonosetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist, is effective for PONV prevention. Herein, we compared palonosetron and aprepitant (a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) for PONV prevention in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. METHODS: Ninety-three patients who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery under general anaesthesia were assigned to receive either a single intravenous injection of 0.075-mg palonosetron or 40-mg oral aprepitant in a double-blind randomised trial. The primary efficacy end points included complete response (visual analogue scale [VAS] nausea score <4 and no use of rescue therapy) 0–48 h after surgery. Nausea severity (0–10) and use of rescue therapy were monitored for 0–48 h. The secondary efficacy end points were the effect of aprepitant quantified using a 10-point VAS for pain, consumption of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and use of rescue analgesics. RESULTS: Aprepitant was non-inferior to palonosetron in terms of complete response 0–48 hours after surgery (74% vs. 77%). At 0 and 2 h after administration, the nausea severity with 40-mg aprepitant was significantly lesser than that with 0.075-mg palonosetron (P < 0.05). At 6 and 24 h after administration, fentanyl consumption with 40-mg aprepitant was significantly lower than that with 0.075-mg palonosetron. Greater amounts of rescue analgesics were required in the aprepitant group. CONCLUSIONS: Palonosetron and aprepitant were both effective for PONV prevention in the patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. The drugs can be used in combination for multimodal therapy because they bind to different receptors. More research is needed to evaluate the effects of aprepitant on pain management in humans. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4146452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41464522014-08-28 Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial Moon, Hyoung Yong Baek, Chong Wha Choi, Geun Joo Shin, Hwa Yong Kang, Hyun Jung, Yong Hun Woo, Young Cheol Kim, Jin Yun Park, Seul Gi BMC Anesthesiol Research Article BACKGROUND: Postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) is one of the most common postsurgical complications. Palonosetron, a 5-hydroxytryptamine receptor antagonist, is effective for PONV prevention. Herein, we compared palonosetron and aprepitant (a neurokinin-1 receptor antagonist) for PONV prevention in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. METHODS: Ninety-three patients who were scheduled to undergo laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery under general anaesthesia were assigned to receive either a single intravenous injection of 0.075-mg palonosetron or 40-mg oral aprepitant in a double-blind randomised trial. The primary efficacy end points included complete response (visual analogue scale [VAS] nausea score <4 and no use of rescue therapy) 0–48 h after surgery. Nausea severity (0–10) and use of rescue therapy were monitored for 0–48 h. The secondary efficacy end points were the effect of aprepitant quantified using a 10-point VAS for pain, consumption of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia, and use of rescue analgesics. RESULTS: Aprepitant was non-inferior to palonosetron in terms of complete response 0–48 hours after surgery (74% vs. 77%). At 0 and 2 h after administration, the nausea severity with 40-mg aprepitant was significantly lesser than that with 0.075-mg palonosetron (P < 0.05). At 6 and 24 h after administration, fentanyl consumption with 40-mg aprepitant was significantly lower than that with 0.075-mg palonosetron. Greater amounts of rescue analgesics were required in the aprepitant group. CONCLUSIONS: Palonosetron and aprepitant were both effective for PONV prevention in the patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery. The drugs can be used in combination for multimodal therapy because they bind to different receptors. More research is needed to evaluate the effects of aprepitant on pain management in humans. BioMed Central 2014-08-10 /pmc/articles/PMC4146452/ /pubmed/25165427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-68 Text en Copyright © 2014 Moon et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Moon, Hyoung Yong Baek, Chong Wha Choi, Geun Joo Shin, Hwa Yong Kang, Hyun Jung, Yong Hun Woo, Young Cheol Kim, Jin Yun Park, Seul Gi Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial |
title | Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial |
title_full | Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial |
title_fullStr | Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial |
title_short | Palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial |
title_sort | palonosetron and aprepitant for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients indicated for laparoscopic gynaecologic surgery: a double-blind randomised trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4146452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25165427 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2253-14-68 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT moonhyoungyong palonosetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginpatientsindicatedforlaparoscopicgynaecologicsurgeryadoubleblindrandomisedtrial AT baekchongwha palonosetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginpatientsindicatedforlaparoscopicgynaecologicsurgeryadoubleblindrandomisedtrial AT choigeunjoo palonosetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginpatientsindicatedforlaparoscopicgynaecologicsurgeryadoubleblindrandomisedtrial AT shinhwayong palonosetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginpatientsindicatedforlaparoscopicgynaecologicsurgeryadoubleblindrandomisedtrial AT kanghyun palonosetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginpatientsindicatedforlaparoscopicgynaecologicsurgeryadoubleblindrandomisedtrial AT jungyonghun palonosetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginpatientsindicatedforlaparoscopicgynaecologicsurgeryadoubleblindrandomisedtrial AT wooyoungcheol palonosetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginpatientsindicatedforlaparoscopicgynaecologicsurgeryadoubleblindrandomisedtrial AT kimjinyun palonosetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginpatientsindicatedforlaparoscopicgynaecologicsurgeryadoubleblindrandomisedtrial AT parkseulgi palonosetronandaprepitantforthepreventionofpostoperativenauseaandvomitinginpatientsindicatedforlaparoscopicgynaecologicsurgeryadoubleblindrandomisedtrial |