Cargando…

The MEC1 and MEC2 Lines Represent Two CLL Subclones in Different Stages of Progression towards Prolymphocytic Leukemia

The EBV carrying lines MEC1 and MEC2 were established earlier from explants of blood derived cells of a chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patient at different stages of progression to prolymphocytoid transformation (PLL). This pair of lines is unique in several respects. Their common clonal origin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rasul, Eahsan, Salamon, Daniel, Nagy, Noemi, Leveau, Benjamin, Banati, Ferenc, Szenthe, Kalman, Koroknai, Anita, Minarovits, Janos, Klein, George, Klein, Eva
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4146575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25162594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106008
_version_ 1782332365384712192
author Rasul, Eahsan
Salamon, Daniel
Nagy, Noemi
Leveau, Benjamin
Banati, Ferenc
Szenthe, Kalman
Koroknai, Anita
Minarovits, Janos
Klein, George
Klein, Eva
author_facet Rasul, Eahsan
Salamon, Daniel
Nagy, Noemi
Leveau, Benjamin
Banati, Ferenc
Szenthe, Kalman
Koroknai, Anita
Minarovits, Janos
Klein, George
Klein, Eva
author_sort Rasul, Eahsan
collection PubMed
description The EBV carrying lines MEC1 and MEC2 were established earlier from explants of blood derived cells of a chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patient at different stages of progression to prolymphocytoid transformation (PLL). This pair of lines is unique in several respects. Their common clonal origin was proven by the rearrangement of the immunoglobulin genes. The cells were driven to proliferation in vitro by the same indigenous EBV strain. They are phenotypically different and represent subsequent subclones emerging in the CLL population. Furthermore they reflect the clinical progression of the disease. We emphasize that the support for the expression of the EBV encoded growth program is an important differentiation marker of the CLL cells of origin that was shared by the two subclones. It can be surmised that proliferation of EBV carrying cells in vitro, but not in vivo, reflects the efficient surveillance that functions even in the severe leukemic condition. The MEC1 line arose before the aggressive clinical stage from an EBV carrying cell within the subclone that was in the early prolymphocytic transformation stage while the MEC2 line originated one year later, from the subsequent subclone with overt PLL characteristics. At this time the disease was disseminated and the blood lymphocyte count was considerably elevated. The EBV induced proliferation of the MEC cells belonging to the subclones with markers of PLL agrees with earlier reports in which cells of PLL disease were infected in vitro and immortalized to LCL. They prove also that the expression of EBV encoded set of proteins can be determined at the event of infection. This pair of lines is particularly important as they provide in vitro cells that represent the subclonal evolution of the CLL disease. Furthermore, the phenotype of the MEC1 cells shares several characteristics of ex vivo CLL cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4146575
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41465752014-08-29 The MEC1 and MEC2 Lines Represent Two CLL Subclones in Different Stages of Progression towards Prolymphocytic Leukemia Rasul, Eahsan Salamon, Daniel Nagy, Noemi Leveau, Benjamin Banati, Ferenc Szenthe, Kalman Koroknai, Anita Minarovits, Janos Klein, George Klein, Eva PLoS One Research Article The EBV carrying lines MEC1 and MEC2 were established earlier from explants of blood derived cells of a chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patient at different stages of progression to prolymphocytoid transformation (PLL). This pair of lines is unique in several respects. Their common clonal origin was proven by the rearrangement of the immunoglobulin genes. The cells were driven to proliferation in vitro by the same indigenous EBV strain. They are phenotypically different and represent subsequent subclones emerging in the CLL population. Furthermore they reflect the clinical progression of the disease. We emphasize that the support for the expression of the EBV encoded growth program is an important differentiation marker of the CLL cells of origin that was shared by the two subclones. It can be surmised that proliferation of EBV carrying cells in vitro, but not in vivo, reflects the efficient surveillance that functions even in the severe leukemic condition. The MEC1 line arose before the aggressive clinical stage from an EBV carrying cell within the subclone that was in the early prolymphocytic transformation stage while the MEC2 line originated one year later, from the subsequent subclone with overt PLL characteristics. At this time the disease was disseminated and the blood lymphocyte count was considerably elevated. The EBV induced proliferation of the MEC cells belonging to the subclones with markers of PLL agrees with earlier reports in which cells of PLL disease were infected in vitro and immortalized to LCL. They prove also that the expression of EBV encoded set of proteins can be determined at the event of infection. This pair of lines is particularly important as they provide in vitro cells that represent the subclonal evolution of the CLL disease. Furthermore, the phenotype of the MEC1 cells shares several characteristics of ex vivo CLL cells. Public Library of Science 2014-08-27 /pmc/articles/PMC4146575/ /pubmed/25162594 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106008 Text en © 2014 Rasul et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Rasul, Eahsan
Salamon, Daniel
Nagy, Noemi
Leveau, Benjamin
Banati, Ferenc
Szenthe, Kalman
Koroknai, Anita
Minarovits, Janos
Klein, George
Klein, Eva
The MEC1 and MEC2 Lines Represent Two CLL Subclones in Different Stages of Progression towards Prolymphocytic Leukemia
title The MEC1 and MEC2 Lines Represent Two CLL Subclones in Different Stages of Progression towards Prolymphocytic Leukemia
title_full The MEC1 and MEC2 Lines Represent Two CLL Subclones in Different Stages of Progression towards Prolymphocytic Leukemia
title_fullStr The MEC1 and MEC2 Lines Represent Two CLL Subclones in Different Stages of Progression towards Prolymphocytic Leukemia
title_full_unstemmed The MEC1 and MEC2 Lines Represent Two CLL Subclones in Different Stages of Progression towards Prolymphocytic Leukemia
title_short The MEC1 and MEC2 Lines Represent Two CLL Subclones in Different Stages of Progression towards Prolymphocytic Leukemia
title_sort mec1 and mec2 lines represent two cll subclones in different stages of progression towards prolymphocytic leukemia
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4146575/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25162594
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106008
work_keys_str_mv AT rasuleahsan themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT salamondaniel themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT nagynoemi themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT leveaubenjamin themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT banatiferenc themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT szenthekalman themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT koroknaianita themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT minarovitsjanos themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT kleingeorge themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT kleineva themec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT rasuleahsan mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT salamondaniel mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT nagynoemi mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT leveaubenjamin mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT banatiferenc mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT szenthekalman mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT koroknaianita mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT minarovitsjanos mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT kleingeorge mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia
AT kleineva mec1andmec2linesrepresenttwocllsubclonesindifferentstagesofprogressiontowardsprolymphocyticleukemia