Cargando…

Validation of the Thai Version of a Work-related Quality of Life Scale in the Nursing Profession

BACKGROUND: Currently available questionnaires for evaluating the quality of worklife do not fully examine every factor related to worklife in all cultures. A tool in Thai is therefore needed for the direct evaluation of the quality of worklife. Our aim was to translate the Work-related Quality of L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sirisawasd, Poramate, Chaiear, Naesinee, Johns, Nutjaree Pratheepawanit, Khiewyoo, Jiraporn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4147237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25180138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.02.002
_version_ 1782332405572435968
author Sirisawasd, Poramate
Chaiear, Naesinee
Johns, Nutjaree Pratheepawanit
Khiewyoo, Jiraporn
author_facet Sirisawasd, Poramate
Chaiear, Naesinee
Johns, Nutjaree Pratheepawanit
Khiewyoo, Jiraporn
author_sort Sirisawasd, Poramate
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Currently available questionnaires for evaluating the quality of worklife do not fully examine every factor related to worklife in all cultures. A tool in Thai is therefore needed for the direct evaluation of the quality of worklife. Our aim was to translate the Work-related Quality of Life Scale-2 (WRQLS-2) into Thai, to assess the validity and reliability of the Thai-translated version, and to examine the tool's accuracy vis-à-vis nursing in Thailand. METHODS: This was a descriptive correlation study. Forward and backward translations were performed to develop a Thai version of the WRQLS. Six nursing experts participated in assessing content validity and 374 registered nurses (RNs) participated in its testing. After a 2-week interval, 67 RNs were retested. Structural validity was examined using principal components analysis. The Cronbach's alpha values were calculated. The respective independent sample t test and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to analyze known-group validity and test–retest reliability. Multistate sampling was used to select 374 RNs from the In- and Outpatient Department of Srinagarind Hospital of the Khon Kaen University (Khon Kaen, Thailand). RESULTS: The content validity index of the scale was 0.97. Principal components analysis resulted in a seven-factor model, which explains 59% of the total variance. The overall Cronbach's alpha value was 0.925, whereas the subscales ranged between 0.67 and 0.82. In the assessment results, the known-group validity was established for the difference between civil servants and university employees [F (7.982, 0.005) and t (3.351; p < 0.05)]. Civil servants apparently had a better quality worklife, compared to university employees. Good test–retest reliability was observed (r = 0.892, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Thai version of a WRQLS appears to be well validated and practicable for determining the quality of the work-life among nurses in Thailand.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4147237
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41472372014-09-01 Validation of the Thai Version of a Work-related Quality of Life Scale in the Nursing Profession Sirisawasd, Poramate Chaiear, Naesinee Johns, Nutjaree Pratheepawanit Khiewyoo, Jiraporn Saf Health Work Original Article BACKGROUND: Currently available questionnaires for evaluating the quality of worklife do not fully examine every factor related to worklife in all cultures. A tool in Thai is therefore needed for the direct evaluation of the quality of worklife. Our aim was to translate the Work-related Quality of Life Scale-2 (WRQLS-2) into Thai, to assess the validity and reliability of the Thai-translated version, and to examine the tool's accuracy vis-à-vis nursing in Thailand. METHODS: This was a descriptive correlation study. Forward and backward translations were performed to develop a Thai version of the WRQLS. Six nursing experts participated in assessing content validity and 374 registered nurses (RNs) participated in its testing. After a 2-week interval, 67 RNs were retested. Structural validity was examined using principal components analysis. The Cronbach's alpha values were calculated. The respective independent sample t test and intraclass correlation coefficient were used to analyze known-group validity and test–retest reliability. Multistate sampling was used to select 374 RNs from the In- and Outpatient Department of Srinagarind Hospital of the Khon Kaen University (Khon Kaen, Thailand). RESULTS: The content validity index of the scale was 0.97. Principal components analysis resulted in a seven-factor model, which explains 59% of the total variance. The overall Cronbach's alpha value was 0.925, whereas the subscales ranged between 0.67 and 0.82. In the assessment results, the known-group validity was established for the difference between civil servants and university employees [F (7.982, 0.005) and t (3.351; p < 0.05)]. Civil servants apparently had a better quality worklife, compared to university employees. Good test–retest reliability was observed (r = 0.892, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The Thai version of a WRQLS appears to be well validated and practicable for determining the quality of the work-life among nurses in Thailand. 2014-03-22 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4147237/ /pubmed/25180138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.02.002 Text en © 2014 Published by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY-NC License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0).
spellingShingle Original Article
Sirisawasd, Poramate
Chaiear, Naesinee
Johns, Nutjaree Pratheepawanit
Khiewyoo, Jiraporn
Validation of the Thai Version of a Work-related Quality of Life Scale in the Nursing Profession
title Validation of the Thai Version of a Work-related Quality of Life Scale in the Nursing Profession
title_full Validation of the Thai Version of a Work-related Quality of Life Scale in the Nursing Profession
title_fullStr Validation of the Thai Version of a Work-related Quality of Life Scale in the Nursing Profession
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Thai Version of a Work-related Quality of Life Scale in the Nursing Profession
title_short Validation of the Thai Version of a Work-related Quality of Life Scale in the Nursing Profession
title_sort validation of the thai version of a work-related quality of life scale in the nursing profession
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4147237/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25180138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shaw.2014.02.002
work_keys_str_mv AT sirisawasdporamate validationofthethaiversionofaworkrelatedqualityoflifescaleinthenursingprofession
AT chaiearnaesinee validationofthethaiversionofaworkrelatedqualityoflifescaleinthenursingprofession
AT johnsnutjareepratheepawanit validationofthethaiversionofaworkrelatedqualityoflifescaleinthenursingprofession
AT khiewyoojiraporn validationofthethaiversionofaworkrelatedqualityoflifescaleinthenursingprofession