Cargando…

A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system has assigned a surgical complexity level to each of its medical centers by specifying requirements to perform standard, intermediate or complex surgical procedures. No study to similarly describe the patterns of relative surgical complexity...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Studnicki, James, Craver, Christopher, Blanchette, Christopher M, Fisher, John W, Shahbazi, Sara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4147936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-55
_version_ 1782332541971202048
author Studnicki, James
Craver, Christopher
Blanchette, Christopher M
Fisher, John W
Shahbazi, Sara
author_facet Studnicki, James
Craver, Christopher
Blanchette, Christopher M
Fisher, John W
Shahbazi, Sara
author_sort Studnicki, James
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system has assigned a surgical complexity level to each of its medical centers by specifying requirements to perform standard, intermediate or complex surgical procedures. No study to similarly describe the patterns of relative surgical complexity among a population of United States (U.S) civilian hospitals has been completed. METHODS: Design: single year, retrospective, cross-sectional. Setting/Participants: the study used Florida Inpatient Discharge Data from short-term acute hospitals for calendar year 2009. Two hundred hospitals with 2,542,920 discharges were organized into four quartiles (Q 1, 2, 3, 4) based on the number of complex procedures per hospital. The VHA surgical complexity matrix was applied to assign relative complexity to each procedure. The Clinical Classification Software (CCS) system assigned complex procedures to clinically meaningful groups. For outcome comparisons, propensity score matching methods adjusted for the surgical procedure, age, gender, race, comorbidities, mechanical ventilator use and type of admission. Main Outcome Measures: in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay (LOS). RESULTS: Only 5.2% of all inpatient discharges involve a complex procedure. The highest volume complex procedure hospitals (Q4) have 49.8% of all discharges but 70.1% of all complex procedures. In the 133,436 discharges with a primary complex procedure, 374 separate specific procedures are identified, only about one third of which are performed in the lowest volume complex procedure (Q1) hospitals. Complex operations of the digestive, respiratory, integumentary and musculoskeletal systems are the least concentrated and proportionately more likely to occur in the lower volume hospitals. Operations of the cardiovascular system and certain technology dependent miscellaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are the most concentrated in high volume hospitals. Organ transplants are only done in Q4 hospitals. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality rates and the longest lengths of stay were found in higher volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Complex surgery in Florida is effectively regionalized so that small volume hospitals operating within the range of complex procedures appropriate to their capabilities provide no increased risk of post surgical mortality.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4147936
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41479362014-08-29 A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery Studnicki, James Craver, Christopher Blanchette, Christopher M Fisher, John W Shahbazi, Sara BMC Surg Research Article BACKGROUND: The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) system has assigned a surgical complexity level to each of its medical centers by specifying requirements to perform standard, intermediate or complex surgical procedures. No study to similarly describe the patterns of relative surgical complexity among a population of United States (U.S) civilian hospitals has been completed. METHODS: Design: single year, retrospective, cross-sectional. Setting/Participants: the study used Florida Inpatient Discharge Data from short-term acute hospitals for calendar year 2009. Two hundred hospitals with 2,542,920 discharges were organized into four quartiles (Q 1, 2, 3, 4) based on the number of complex procedures per hospital. The VHA surgical complexity matrix was applied to assign relative complexity to each procedure. The Clinical Classification Software (CCS) system assigned complex procedures to clinically meaningful groups. For outcome comparisons, propensity score matching methods adjusted for the surgical procedure, age, gender, race, comorbidities, mechanical ventilator use and type of admission. Main Outcome Measures: in-hospital mortality and length-of-stay (LOS). RESULTS: Only 5.2% of all inpatient discharges involve a complex procedure. The highest volume complex procedure hospitals (Q4) have 49.8% of all discharges but 70.1% of all complex procedures. In the 133,436 discharges with a primary complex procedure, 374 separate specific procedures are identified, only about one third of which are performed in the lowest volume complex procedure (Q1) hospitals. Complex operations of the digestive, respiratory, integumentary and musculoskeletal systems are the least concentrated and proportionately more likely to occur in the lower volume hospitals. Operations of the cardiovascular system and certain technology dependent miscellaneous diagnostic and therapeutic procedures are the most concentrated in high volume hospitals. Organ transplants are only done in Q4 hospitals. There were no significant differences in in-hospital mortality rates and the longest lengths of stay were found in higher volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: Complex surgery in Florida is effectively regionalized so that small volume hospitals operating within the range of complex procedures appropriate to their capabilities provide no increased risk of post surgical mortality. BioMed Central 2014-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4147936/ /pubmed/25128011 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-55 Text en Copyright © 2014 Studnicki et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Studnicki, James
Craver, Christopher
Blanchette, Christopher M
Fisher, John W
Shahbazi, Sara
A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery
title A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery
title_full A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery
title_fullStr A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery
title_full_unstemmed A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery
title_short A cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery
title_sort cross-sectional retrospective analysis of the regionalization of complex surgery
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4147936/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25128011
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-55
work_keys_str_mv AT studnickijames acrosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery
AT craverchristopher acrosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery
AT blanchettechristopherm acrosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery
AT fisherjohnw acrosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery
AT shahbazisara acrosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery
AT studnickijames crosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery
AT craverchristopher crosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery
AT blanchettechristopherm crosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery
AT fisherjohnw crosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery
AT shahbazisara crosssectionalretrospectiveanalysisoftheregionalizationofcomplexsurgery