Cargando…
Examination of exhaustive cloning attempts reveals that C. elegans piRNAs, transposons, and repeat sequences are efficiently cloned in yeast, but not in bacteria
Genome sequencing requires insertion of random fragments of the sequenced organism’s DNA into a unicellular host, most often Escherichia coli bacteria. This manipulation was found in the past to be analogous to naturally occurring horizontal gene transfer, and moreover has proved valuable to underst...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25221566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00275 |
_version_ | 1782332549738004480 |
---|---|
author | Sagy, Or Shamir, Ron Rechavi, Oded |
author_facet | Sagy, Or Shamir, Ron Rechavi, Oded |
author_sort | Sagy, Or |
collection | PubMed |
description | Genome sequencing requires insertion of random fragments of the sequenced organism’s DNA into a unicellular host, most often Escherichia coli bacteria. This manipulation was found in the past to be analogous to naturally occurring horizontal gene transfer, and moreover has proved valuable to understanding toxicity of foreign genetic elements to E. coli. Sequencing of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome was similarly achieved via DNA transformation into E. coli. However, numerous attempts have proven a significant percentage of the genome unclonable using bacteria, although clonable via yeast. We examined the genomic segments that were not clonable in bacteria but were clonable in yeast, and observed that, in line with previous hypotheses, such sequences are more repetitive on average compared with the entire C. elegans genome. In addition, we found that these gap-sequences encode significantly more for DNA transposons. Surprisingly, we discovered that although the vast majority of the C. elegans genome is clonable in bacteria (77.5%), almost all the thousands of sequences that encode for PIWI-interacting small RNAs, or 21U-RNAs (91.6%) were only clonable in yeast. These results might help understanding why most piRNAs in C. elegans are physically clustered on particular loci on chromosome IV. In worms and in a large number of other organisms, piRNAs serve to distinguish “Self” from “Non-Self” sequences, and thus to protect the integrity of the genome against foreign genetic elements, such as transposons. We discuss the possible implications of these discoveries. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4148067 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41480672014-09-12 Examination of exhaustive cloning attempts reveals that C. elegans piRNAs, transposons, and repeat sequences are efficiently cloned in yeast, but not in bacteria Sagy, Or Shamir, Ron Rechavi, Oded Front Genet Genetics Genome sequencing requires insertion of random fragments of the sequenced organism’s DNA into a unicellular host, most often Escherichia coli bacteria. This manipulation was found in the past to be analogous to naturally occurring horizontal gene transfer, and moreover has proved valuable to understanding toxicity of foreign genetic elements to E. coli. Sequencing of the Caenorhabditis elegans genome was similarly achieved via DNA transformation into E. coli. However, numerous attempts have proven a significant percentage of the genome unclonable using bacteria, although clonable via yeast. We examined the genomic segments that were not clonable in bacteria but were clonable in yeast, and observed that, in line with previous hypotheses, such sequences are more repetitive on average compared with the entire C. elegans genome. In addition, we found that these gap-sequences encode significantly more for DNA transposons. Surprisingly, we discovered that although the vast majority of the C. elegans genome is clonable in bacteria (77.5%), almost all the thousands of sequences that encode for PIWI-interacting small RNAs, or 21U-RNAs (91.6%) were only clonable in yeast. These results might help understanding why most piRNAs in C. elegans are physically clustered on particular loci on chromosome IV. In worms and in a large number of other organisms, piRNAs serve to distinguish “Self” from “Non-Self” sequences, and thus to protect the integrity of the genome against foreign genetic elements, such as transposons. We discuss the possible implications of these discoveries. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4148067/ /pubmed/25221566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00275 Text en Copyright © 2014 Sagy, Shamir and Rechavi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Genetics Sagy, Or Shamir, Ron Rechavi, Oded Examination of exhaustive cloning attempts reveals that C. elegans piRNAs, transposons, and repeat sequences are efficiently cloned in yeast, but not in bacteria |
title | Examination of exhaustive cloning attempts reveals that C. elegans piRNAs, transposons, and repeat sequences are efficiently cloned in yeast, but not in bacteria |
title_full | Examination of exhaustive cloning attempts reveals that C. elegans piRNAs, transposons, and repeat sequences are efficiently cloned in yeast, but not in bacteria |
title_fullStr | Examination of exhaustive cloning attempts reveals that C. elegans piRNAs, transposons, and repeat sequences are efficiently cloned in yeast, but not in bacteria |
title_full_unstemmed | Examination of exhaustive cloning attempts reveals that C. elegans piRNAs, transposons, and repeat sequences are efficiently cloned in yeast, but not in bacteria |
title_short | Examination of exhaustive cloning attempts reveals that C. elegans piRNAs, transposons, and repeat sequences are efficiently cloned in yeast, but not in bacteria |
title_sort | examination of exhaustive cloning attempts reveals that c. elegans pirnas, transposons, and repeat sequences are efficiently cloned in yeast, but not in bacteria |
topic | Genetics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148067/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25221566 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2014.00275 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sagyor examinationofexhaustivecloningattemptsrevealsthatceleganspirnastransposonsandrepeatsequencesareefficientlyclonedinyeastbutnotinbacteria AT shamirron examinationofexhaustivecloningattemptsrevealsthatceleganspirnastransposonsandrepeatsequencesareefficientlyclonedinyeastbutnotinbacteria AT rechavioded examinationofexhaustivecloningattemptsrevealsthatceleganspirnastransposonsandrepeatsequencesareefficientlyclonedinyeastbutnotinbacteria |