Cargando…

Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth

Despite internal complexity, tumor growth kinetics follow relatively simple laws that can be expressed as mathematical models. To explore this further, quantitative analysis of the most classical of these were performed. The models were assessed against data from two in vivo experimental systems: an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Benzekry, Sébastien, Lamont, Clare, Beheshti, Afshin, Tracz, Amanda, Ebos, John M. L., Hlatky, Lynn, Hahnfeldt, Philip
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25167199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003800
_version_ 1782332574496980992
author Benzekry, Sébastien
Lamont, Clare
Beheshti, Afshin
Tracz, Amanda
Ebos, John M. L.
Hlatky, Lynn
Hahnfeldt, Philip
author_facet Benzekry, Sébastien
Lamont, Clare
Beheshti, Afshin
Tracz, Amanda
Ebos, John M. L.
Hlatky, Lynn
Hahnfeldt, Philip
author_sort Benzekry, Sébastien
collection PubMed
description Despite internal complexity, tumor growth kinetics follow relatively simple laws that can be expressed as mathematical models. To explore this further, quantitative analysis of the most classical of these were performed. The models were assessed against data from two in vivo experimental systems: an ectopic syngeneic tumor (Lewis lung carcinoma) and an orthotopically xenografted human breast carcinoma. The goals were threefold: 1) to determine a statistical model for description of the measurement error, 2) to establish the descriptive power of each model, using several goodness-of-fit metrics and a study of parametric identifiability, and 3) to assess the models' ability to forecast future tumor growth. The models included in the study comprised the exponential, exponential-linear, power law, Gompertz, logistic, generalized logistic, von Bertalanffy and a model with dynamic carrying capacity. For the breast data, the dynamics were best captured by the Gompertz and exponential-linear models. The latter also exhibited the highest predictive power, with excellent prediction scores (≥80%) extending out as far as 12 days in the future. For the lung data, the Gompertz and power law models provided the most parsimonious and parametrically identifiable description. However, not one of the models was able to achieve a substantial prediction rate (≥70%) beyond the next day data point. In this context, adjunction of a priori information on the parameter distribution led to considerable improvement. For instance, forecast success rates went from 14.9% to 62.7% when using the power law model to predict the full future tumor growth curves, using just three data points. These results not only have important implications for biological theories of tumor growth and the use of mathematical modeling in preclinical anti-cancer drug investigations, but also may assist in defining how mathematical models could serve as potential prognostic tools in the clinic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4148196
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41481962014-08-29 Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth Benzekry, Sébastien Lamont, Clare Beheshti, Afshin Tracz, Amanda Ebos, John M. L. Hlatky, Lynn Hahnfeldt, Philip PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Despite internal complexity, tumor growth kinetics follow relatively simple laws that can be expressed as mathematical models. To explore this further, quantitative analysis of the most classical of these were performed. The models were assessed against data from two in vivo experimental systems: an ectopic syngeneic tumor (Lewis lung carcinoma) and an orthotopically xenografted human breast carcinoma. The goals were threefold: 1) to determine a statistical model for description of the measurement error, 2) to establish the descriptive power of each model, using several goodness-of-fit metrics and a study of parametric identifiability, and 3) to assess the models' ability to forecast future tumor growth. The models included in the study comprised the exponential, exponential-linear, power law, Gompertz, logistic, generalized logistic, von Bertalanffy and a model with dynamic carrying capacity. For the breast data, the dynamics were best captured by the Gompertz and exponential-linear models. The latter also exhibited the highest predictive power, with excellent prediction scores (≥80%) extending out as far as 12 days in the future. For the lung data, the Gompertz and power law models provided the most parsimonious and parametrically identifiable description. However, not one of the models was able to achieve a substantial prediction rate (≥70%) beyond the next day data point. In this context, adjunction of a priori information on the parameter distribution led to considerable improvement. For instance, forecast success rates went from 14.9% to 62.7% when using the power law model to predict the full future tumor growth curves, using just three data points. These results not only have important implications for biological theories of tumor growth and the use of mathematical modeling in preclinical anti-cancer drug investigations, but also may assist in defining how mathematical models could serve as potential prognostic tools in the clinic. Public Library of Science 2014-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4148196/ /pubmed/25167199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003800 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Benzekry, Sébastien
Lamont, Clare
Beheshti, Afshin
Tracz, Amanda
Ebos, John M. L.
Hlatky, Lynn
Hahnfeldt, Philip
Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth
title Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth
title_full Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth
title_fullStr Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth
title_full_unstemmed Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth
title_short Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth
title_sort classical mathematical models for description and prediction of experimental tumor growth
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148196/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25167199
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003800
work_keys_str_mv AT benzekrysebastien classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth
AT lamontclare classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth
AT beheshtiafshin classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth
AT traczamanda classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth
AT ebosjohnml classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth
AT hlatkylynn classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth
AT hahnfeldtphilip classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth