Cargando…
Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth
Despite internal complexity, tumor growth kinetics follow relatively simple laws that can be expressed as mathematical models. To explore this further, quantitative analysis of the most classical of these were performed. The models were assessed against data from two in vivo experimental systems: an...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25167199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003800 |
_version_ | 1782332574496980992 |
---|---|
author | Benzekry, Sébastien Lamont, Clare Beheshti, Afshin Tracz, Amanda Ebos, John M. L. Hlatky, Lynn Hahnfeldt, Philip |
author_facet | Benzekry, Sébastien Lamont, Clare Beheshti, Afshin Tracz, Amanda Ebos, John M. L. Hlatky, Lynn Hahnfeldt, Philip |
author_sort | Benzekry, Sébastien |
collection | PubMed |
description | Despite internal complexity, tumor growth kinetics follow relatively simple laws that can be expressed as mathematical models. To explore this further, quantitative analysis of the most classical of these were performed. The models were assessed against data from two in vivo experimental systems: an ectopic syngeneic tumor (Lewis lung carcinoma) and an orthotopically xenografted human breast carcinoma. The goals were threefold: 1) to determine a statistical model for description of the measurement error, 2) to establish the descriptive power of each model, using several goodness-of-fit metrics and a study of parametric identifiability, and 3) to assess the models' ability to forecast future tumor growth. The models included in the study comprised the exponential, exponential-linear, power law, Gompertz, logistic, generalized logistic, von Bertalanffy and a model with dynamic carrying capacity. For the breast data, the dynamics were best captured by the Gompertz and exponential-linear models. The latter also exhibited the highest predictive power, with excellent prediction scores (≥80%) extending out as far as 12 days in the future. For the lung data, the Gompertz and power law models provided the most parsimonious and parametrically identifiable description. However, not one of the models was able to achieve a substantial prediction rate (≥70%) beyond the next day data point. In this context, adjunction of a priori information on the parameter distribution led to considerable improvement. For instance, forecast success rates went from 14.9% to 62.7% when using the power law model to predict the full future tumor growth curves, using just three data points. These results not only have important implications for biological theories of tumor growth and the use of mathematical modeling in preclinical anti-cancer drug investigations, but also may assist in defining how mathematical models could serve as potential prognostic tools in the clinic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4148196 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41481962014-08-29 Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth Benzekry, Sébastien Lamont, Clare Beheshti, Afshin Tracz, Amanda Ebos, John M. L. Hlatky, Lynn Hahnfeldt, Philip PLoS Comput Biol Research Article Despite internal complexity, tumor growth kinetics follow relatively simple laws that can be expressed as mathematical models. To explore this further, quantitative analysis of the most classical of these were performed. The models were assessed against data from two in vivo experimental systems: an ectopic syngeneic tumor (Lewis lung carcinoma) and an orthotopically xenografted human breast carcinoma. The goals were threefold: 1) to determine a statistical model for description of the measurement error, 2) to establish the descriptive power of each model, using several goodness-of-fit metrics and a study of parametric identifiability, and 3) to assess the models' ability to forecast future tumor growth. The models included in the study comprised the exponential, exponential-linear, power law, Gompertz, logistic, generalized logistic, von Bertalanffy and a model with dynamic carrying capacity. For the breast data, the dynamics were best captured by the Gompertz and exponential-linear models. The latter also exhibited the highest predictive power, with excellent prediction scores (≥80%) extending out as far as 12 days in the future. For the lung data, the Gompertz and power law models provided the most parsimonious and parametrically identifiable description. However, not one of the models was able to achieve a substantial prediction rate (≥70%) beyond the next day data point. In this context, adjunction of a priori information on the parameter distribution led to considerable improvement. For instance, forecast success rates went from 14.9% to 62.7% when using the power law model to predict the full future tumor growth curves, using just three data points. These results not only have important implications for biological theories of tumor growth and the use of mathematical modeling in preclinical anti-cancer drug investigations, but also may assist in defining how mathematical models could serve as potential prognostic tools in the clinic. Public Library of Science 2014-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4148196/ /pubmed/25167199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003800 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Benzekry, Sébastien Lamont, Clare Beheshti, Afshin Tracz, Amanda Ebos, John M. L. Hlatky, Lynn Hahnfeldt, Philip Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth |
title | Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth |
title_full | Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth |
title_fullStr | Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth |
title_full_unstemmed | Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth |
title_short | Classical Mathematical Models for Description and Prediction of Experimental Tumor Growth |
title_sort | classical mathematical models for description and prediction of experimental tumor growth |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148196/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25167199 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003800 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT benzekrysebastien classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth AT lamontclare classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth AT beheshtiafshin classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth AT traczamanda classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth AT ebosjohnml classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth AT hlatkylynn classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth AT hahnfeldtphilip classicalmathematicalmodelsfordescriptionandpredictionofexperimentaltumorgrowth |