Cargando…

Validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies

There is a need for tools to measure the information patients need in order for healthcare professionals in general, and particularly pharmacists, to communicate effectively and play an active part in the way patients manage their medicines. Previous research has developed and validated constructs t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costa, Filipa A., Duggan, Catherine, Bates, Ian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2008
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177402
_version_ 1782332622597259264
author Costa, Filipa A.
Duggan, Catherine
Bates, Ian
author_facet Costa, Filipa A.
Duggan, Catherine
Bates, Ian
author_sort Costa, Filipa A.
collection PubMed
description There is a need for tools to measure the information patients need in order for healthcare professionals in general, and particularly pharmacists, to communicate effectively and play an active part in the way patients manage their medicines. Previous research has developed and validated constructs to measure patients’ desires for information and their perceptions of how useful their medicines are. It is important to develop these tools for use in different settings and countries so that best practice is shared and is based on the best available evidence. OBJECTIVES: this project sought to validate of a survey tool measuring the “Extent of Information Desired” (EID), the “Perceived Utility of Medicines” (PUM), and the “Anxiety about Illness” (AI) that had been previously translated for use with Portuguese patients. METHODS: The scales were validated in a patient sample of 596: construct validity was explored in Factor analysis (PCA) and internal consistency analysed using Cronbach’s alpha. Criterion validity was explored correlating scores to the AI scale and patients’ perceived health status. Discriminatory power was assessed using ANOVA. Temporal stability was explored in a sub-sample of patients who responded at two time points, using a T-test to compare their mean scores. RESULTS: Construct validity results indicated the need to remove 1 item from the Perceived Harm of Medicines (PHM) and Perceived Benefit of Medicines (PBM) for use in a Portuguese sample and the abandon of the tolerance scale. The internal consistency was high for the EID, PBM and AI scales (alpha>0.600) and acceptable for the PHM scale (alpha=0.536). All scales, except the EID, were consistent over time (p>0.05; p<0.01). All the scales tested showed good discriminatory power. The comparison of the AI scale with the SF-36 indicated good criterion validity (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The translated tool was valid and reliable in Portuguese patients-excluding the Tolerance scale. Some of the scales may benefit from further refinement, such as the PHM subscale.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4148410
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2008
publisher Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41484102014-08-29 Validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies Costa, Filipa A. Duggan, Catherine Bates, Ian Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research There is a need for tools to measure the information patients need in order for healthcare professionals in general, and particularly pharmacists, to communicate effectively and play an active part in the way patients manage their medicines. Previous research has developed and validated constructs to measure patients’ desires for information and their perceptions of how useful their medicines are. It is important to develop these tools for use in different settings and countries so that best practice is shared and is based on the best available evidence. OBJECTIVES: this project sought to validate of a survey tool measuring the “Extent of Information Desired” (EID), the “Perceived Utility of Medicines” (PUM), and the “Anxiety about Illness” (AI) that had been previously translated for use with Portuguese patients. METHODS: The scales were validated in a patient sample of 596: construct validity was explored in Factor analysis (PCA) and internal consistency analysed using Cronbach’s alpha. Criterion validity was explored correlating scores to the AI scale and patients’ perceived health status. Discriminatory power was assessed using ANOVA. Temporal stability was explored in a sub-sample of patients who responded at two time points, using a T-test to compare their mean scores. RESULTS: Construct validity results indicated the need to remove 1 item from the Perceived Harm of Medicines (PHM) and Perceived Benefit of Medicines (PBM) for use in a Portuguese sample and the abandon of the tolerance scale. The internal consistency was high for the EID, PBM and AI scales (alpha>0.600) and acceptable for the PHM scale (alpha=0.536). All scales, except the EID, were consistent over time (p>0.05; p<0.01). All the scales tested showed good discriminatory power. The comparison of the AI scale with the SF-36 indicated good criterion validity (p<0.05). CONCLUSION: The translated tool was valid and reliable in Portuguese patients-excluding the Tolerance scale. Some of the scales may benefit from further refinement, such as the PHM subscale. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2008 2008-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4148410/ /pubmed/25177402 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Costa, Filipa A.
Duggan, Catherine
Bates, Ian
Validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies
title Validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies
title_full Validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies
title_fullStr Validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies
title_full_unstemmed Validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies
title_short Validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies
title_sort validation of a survey tool for use in cross-cultural studies
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148410/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177402
work_keys_str_mv AT costafilipaa validationofasurveytoolforuseincrossculturalstudies
AT duggancatherine validationofasurveytoolforuseincrossculturalstudies
AT batesian validationofasurveytoolforuseincrossculturalstudies