Cargando…
Patient-reported outcomes of therapy with two brands of ibuprofen
OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients’ reported outcome following medication with two brands of 400 mg ibuprofen used to alleviate musculoskeletal pains. METHODS: Adult peasant manual laborers (85) who met criteria were randomly assigned to receive either of the brands (A or B). Data on pain alleviatio...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas
2008
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177405 |
_version_ | 1782332623312388096 |
---|---|
author | Nwidu, Lucky L. Eniojukan, Joshua F. Oparah, Azuka C. |
author_facet | Nwidu, Lucky L. Eniojukan, Joshua F. Oparah, Azuka C. |
author_sort | Nwidu, Lucky L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients’ reported outcome following medication with two brands of 400 mg ibuprofen used to alleviate musculoskeletal pains. METHODS: Adult peasant manual laborers (85) who met criteria were randomly assigned to receive either of the brands (A or B). Data on pain alleviation were gathered using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Present Pain Intensity (PPI), and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGII) scales. Interval data obtained from the two brands were compared using the Students’ t-test at 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: There were 42 participants, mean age=29.2 (SD=1.37) assigned to brand A and 43 (mean age=28.8 SD=1.14) in brand B of ibuprofen 400 mg. Brand B was consistently rated higher than brand A. Scores for medication efficacy were 10.4 (SD=1.65) (brand A) and 11.4 (SD=1.68) (brand B); t=2.768, P=0.007. Alleviation of pain symptoms: 10.8 (SD=1.64) and 11.6 (SD=1.72); t = 2.194, P=0.031. Similarly, rated scores on the impact of pain on quality of life were 10.5 (SD=2.00) and 12.1 (SD=1.85); t=3.830, P<0.001. There was a reduction in Present Pain Intensity scores by 32.7% and 34.3% for Brand A and brand B participants respectively. The decrease in Visual Analog pain scale score was 35.9% and 37.3% for brand A and brand B participants respectively. The decrease in SF-MPQ was by 85.1% and 69.9% for the brand A and brand B groups respectively. The clinical global impression of improvement for both groups of patients indicated an improvement rate of 71.4% and 61.9% for brand A and 81.4% and 74.4% for brand B participants. CONCLUSION: This clinical study infers that though the two brands of ibuprofen 400 mg are legally pharmaceutical equivalent, they are not clinically equivalent. In most of the parameters evaluated, brand B was rated more efficacious than brand A. This explains the patients’ preferences and demand for this brand of ibuprofen in the Nigerian community. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4148413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2008 |
publisher | Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41484132014-08-29 Patient-reported outcomes of therapy with two brands of ibuprofen Nwidu, Lucky L. Eniojukan, Joshua F. Oparah, Azuka C. Pharm Pract (Granada) Original Research OBJECTIVE: To investigate patients’ reported outcome following medication with two brands of 400 mg ibuprofen used to alleviate musculoskeletal pains. METHODS: Adult peasant manual laborers (85) who met criteria were randomly assigned to receive either of the brands (A or B). Data on pain alleviation were gathered using the Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Present Pain Intensity (PPI), and Clinical Global Impression of Improvement (CGII) scales. Interval data obtained from the two brands were compared using the Students’ t-test at 95% confidence interval. RESULTS: There were 42 participants, mean age=29.2 (SD=1.37) assigned to brand A and 43 (mean age=28.8 SD=1.14) in brand B of ibuprofen 400 mg. Brand B was consistently rated higher than brand A. Scores for medication efficacy were 10.4 (SD=1.65) (brand A) and 11.4 (SD=1.68) (brand B); t=2.768, P=0.007. Alleviation of pain symptoms: 10.8 (SD=1.64) and 11.6 (SD=1.72); t = 2.194, P=0.031. Similarly, rated scores on the impact of pain on quality of life were 10.5 (SD=2.00) and 12.1 (SD=1.85); t=3.830, P<0.001. There was a reduction in Present Pain Intensity scores by 32.7% and 34.3% for Brand A and brand B participants respectively. The decrease in Visual Analog pain scale score was 35.9% and 37.3% for brand A and brand B participants respectively. The decrease in SF-MPQ was by 85.1% and 69.9% for the brand A and brand B groups respectively. The clinical global impression of improvement for both groups of patients indicated an improvement rate of 71.4% and 61.9% for brand A and 81.4% and 74.4% for brand B participants. CONCLUSION: This clinical study infers that though the two brands of ibuprofen 400 mg are legally pharmaceutical equivalent, they are not clinically equivalent. In most of the parameters evaluated, brand B was rated more efficacious than brand A. This explains the patients’ preferences and demand for this brand of ibuprofen in the Nigerian community. Centro de Investigaciones y Publicaciones Farmaceuticas 2008 2008-09-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4148413/ /pubmed/25177405 Text en Copyright: © Pharmacy Practice http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Nwidu, Lucky L. Eniojukan, Joshua F. Oparah, Azuka C. Patient-reported outcomes of therapy with two brands of ibuprofen |
title | Patient-reported outcomes of therapy with two brands of ibuprofen |
title_full | Patient-reported outcomes of therapy with two brands of ibuprofen |
title_fullStr | Patient-reported outcomes of therapy with two brands of ibuprofen |
title_full_unstemmed | Patient-reported outcomes of therapy with two brands of ibuprofen |
title_short | Patient-reported outcomes of therapy with two brands of ibuprofen |
title_sort | patient-reported outcomes of therapy with two brands of ibuprofen |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25177405 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT nwiduluckyl patientreportedoutcomesoftherapywithtwobrandsofibuprofen AT eniojukanjoshuaf patientreportedoutcomesoftherapywithtwobrandsofibuprofen AT oparahazukac patientreportedoutcomesoftherapywithtwobrandsofibuprofen |