Cargando…

Comparative effectiveness of approved first-line anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapeutic agents in the treatment of good and intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND: Based on improved clinical outcomes in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) the FDA and EMA have approved bevacizumab with interferon, sunitinib, and pazopanib in the first-line treatment of low to intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, ther...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Haaland, Benjamin, Chopra, Akhil, Acharyya, Sanchalika, Fay, André P, Lopes, Gilberto de Lima
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-592
_version_ 1782332643812048896
author Haaland, Benjamin
Chopra, Akhil
Acharyya, Sanchalika
Fay, André P
Lopes, Gilberto de Lima
author_facet Haaland, Benjamin
Chopra, Akhil
Acharyya, Sanchalika
Fay, André P
Lopes, Gilberto de Lima
author_sort Haaland, Benjamin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Based on improved clinical outcomes in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) the FDA and EMA have approved bevacizumab with interferon, sunitinib, and pazopanib in the first-line treatment of low to intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, there is little comparative data to help in choosing the most effective drug among these agents. METHODS: We performed an indirect comparative effectiveness analysis of the pivotal RCTs of bevacizumab with interferon, sunitinib, or pazopanib compared to one another or interferon alone in first-line treatment of metastatic or advanced RCC. Endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and response rate (RR). Adverse events were also examined. RESULTS: The meta-estimate of the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for OS for bevacizumab with interferon vs. interferon alone was 0.86 (0.76-0.97), for sunitinib vs. interferon alone was 0.82 (0.67-1.00), for pazopanib vs. interferon alone was 0.74 (0.57-0.97), for sunitinib vs. bevacizumab with interferon was 0.95 (0.75-1.20), for pazopanib vs. bevacizumab with interferon was 0.86 (0.64-1.16), and for pazopanib vs. sunitinib was 0.91 (0.76-1.08). Similarly, bevacizumab with interferon, sunitinib, or pazopanib had better PFS and RR than interferon alone. Sunitinib and pazopanib had better RR than bevacizumab with interferon and there was suggestive evidence pazopanib may outperform sunitinib in terms of RR. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab with interferon, sunitinib, and pazopanib are adequate first-line options in treatment of mRCC. Interferon alone should not be considered an optimal first-line treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-592) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4148555
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41485552014-08-29 Comparative effectiveness of approved first-line anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapeutic agents in the treatment of good and intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma Haaland, Benjamin Chopra, Akhil Acharyya, Sanchalika Fay, André P Lopes, Gilberto de Lima BMC Cancer Research Article BACKGROUND: Based on improved clinical outcomes in randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) the FDA and EMA have approved bevacizumab with interferon, sunitinib, and pazopanib in the first-line treatment of low to intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, there is little comparative data to help in choosing the most effective drug among these agents. METHODS: We performed an indirect comparative effectiveness analysis of the pivotal RCTs of bevacizumab with interferon, sunitinib, or pazopanib compared to one another or interferon alone in first-line treatment of metastatic or advanced RCC. Endpoints of interest were overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), and response rate (RR). Adverse events were also examined. RESULTS: The meta-estimate of the hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) for OS for bevacizumab with interferon vs. interferon alone was 0.86 (0.76-0.97), for sunitinib vs. interferon alone was 0.82 (0.67-1.00), for pazopanib vs. interferon alone was 0.74 (0.57-0.97), for sunitinib vs. bevacizumab with interferon was 0.95 (0.75-1.20), for pazopanib vs. bevacizumab with interferon was 0.86 (0.64-1.16), and for pazopanib vs. sunitinib was 0.91 (0.76-1.08). Similarly, bevacizumab with interferon, sunitinib, or pazopanib had better PFS and RR than interferon alone. Sunitinib and pazopanib had better RR than bevacizumab with interferon and there was suggestive evidence pazopanib may outperform sunitinib in terms of RR. CONCLUSIONS: Bevacizumab with interferon, sunitinib, and pazopanib are adequate first-line options in treatment of mRCC. Interferon alone should not be considered an optimal first-line treatment. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/1471-2407-14-592) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2014-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4148555/ /pubmed/25127891 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-592 Text en © Haaland et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014 This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Haaland, Benjamin
Chopra, Akhil
Acharyya, Sanchalika
Fay, André P
Lopes, Gilberto de Lima
Comparative effectiveness of approved first-line anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapeutic agents in the treatment of good and intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title Comparative effectiveness of approved first-line anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapeutic agents in the treatment of good and intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_full Comparative effectiveness of approved first-line anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapeutic agents in the treatment of good and intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_fullStr Comparative effectiveness of approved first-line anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapeutic agents in the treatment of good and intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_full_unstemmed Comparative effectiveness of approved first-line anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapeutic agents in the treatment of good and intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_short Comparative effectiveness of approved first-line anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapeutic agents in the treatment of good and intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
title_sort comparative effectiveness of approved first-line anti-angiogenic and molecularly targeted therapeutic agents in the treatment of good and intermediate risk metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148555/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127891
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2407-14-592
work_keys_str_mv AT haalandbenjamin comparativeeffectivenessofapprovedfirstlineantiangiogenicandmolecularlytargetedtherapeuticagentsinthetreatmentofgoodandintermediateriskmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT chopraakhil comparativeeffectivenessofapprovedfirstlineantiangiogenicandmolecularlytargetedtherapeuticagentsinthetreatmentofgoodandintermediateriskmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT acharyyasanchalika comparativeeffectivenessofapprovedfirstlineantiangiogenicandmolecularlytargetedtherapeuticagentsinthetreatmentofgoodandintermediateriskmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT fayandrep comparativeeffectivenessofapprovedfirstlineantiangiogenicandmolecularlytargetedtherapeuticagentsinthetreatmentofgoodandintermediateriskmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma
AT lopesgilbertodelima comparativeeffectivenessofapprovedfirstlineantiangiogenicandmolecularlytargetedtherapeuticagentsinthetreatmentofgoodandintermediateriskmetastaticclearcellrenalcellcarcinoma