Cargando…

Evaluation of Bond Strength: An In vitro Study using Pro Seal

BACKGROUND: Fluoride releasing bonding agent were introduced to take care of white spot lesions. However, their clinically handling properties are less than ideal, deterring many practitioners. Reliance orthodontic products (Itacsa, I11) recently released an enamel sealant named Pro Seal to be used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tarvade, Suchita Madhukar, Deshmukh, Atul Ashok, Daokar, Sadashiv Gopinath
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214723
_version_ 1782332645026299904
author Tarvade, Suchita Madhukar
Deshmukh, Atul Ashok
Daokar, Sadashiv Gopinath
author_facet Tarvade, Suchita Madhukar
Deshmukh, Atul Ashok
Daokar, Sadashiv Gopinath
author_sort Tarvade, Suchita Madhukar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fluoride releasing bonding agent were introduced to take care of white spot lesions. However, their clinically handling properties are less than ideal, deterring many practitioners. Reliance orthodontic products (Itacsa, I11) recently released an enamel sealant named Pro Seal to be used with bonding agents. Hu and Featherstone showed Pro Seal significantly decreased enamel demineralization. Hence, this study was undertaken to study the bond strength using Pro Seal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 freshly extracted first premolars were collected and were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 (Control group): Included 30 premolars where brackets bonded conventionally. Group 2 (Experimental group): Included 30 premolars where brackets bonded using of Pro Seal. Debonding procedures: All the teeth were mounted on a metallic mold. Debonding procedure was carried out for each tooth after a rest period of 5 min. RESULTS: The results from this study show that the mean of bond strength in Group 1 was 24.9 N and in Group 2 was 21.1 N. There was statistical significant difference in bond strength when compared using t-test of Group 1 and Group 2. The study showed that Group 2 showed significantly less bond strength than Group 1. There was statistical significant difference in bond strength when compared using t-test, Group 2 showed significantly less bond strength than Group 1. CONCLUSION: The study showed that use of Pro Seal provided adequate bond strength, but when compared with conventional bonding agents there was a significant decrease in bond strength.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4148562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41485622014-09-11 Evaluation of Bond Strength: An In vitro Study using Pro Seal Tarvade, Suchita Madhukar Deshmukh, Atul Ashok Daokar, Sadashiv Gopinath J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: Fluoride releasing bonding agent were introduced to take care of white spot lesions. However, their clinically handling properties are less than ideal, deterring many practitioners. Reliance orthodontic products (Itacsa, I11) recently released an enamel sealant named Pro Seal to be used with bonding agents. Hu and Featherstone showed Pro Seal significantly decreased enamel demineralization. Hence, this study was undertaken to study the bond strength using Pro Seal. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 60 freshly extracted first premolars were collected and were randomly divided into two groups. Group 1 (Control group): Included 30 premolars where brackets bonded conventionally. Group 2 (Experimental group): Included 30 premolars where brackets bonded using of Pro Seal. Debonding procedures: All the teeth were mounted on a metallic mold. Debonding procedure was carried out for each tooth after a rest period of 5 min. RESULTS: The results from this study show that the mean of bond strength in Group 1 was 24.9 N and in Group 2 was 21.1 N. There was statistical significant difference in bond strength when compared using t-test of Group 1 and Group 2. The study showed that Group 2 showed significantly less bond strength than Group 1. There was statistical significant difference in bond strength when compared using t-test, Group 2 showed significantly less bond strength than Group 1. CONCLUSION: The study showed that use of Pro Seal provided adequate bond strength, but when compared with conventional bonding agents there was a significant decrease in bond strength. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4148562/ /pubmed/25214723 Text en Copyright: © J. Int Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Tarvade, Suchita Madhukar
Deshmukh, Atul Ashok
Daokar, Sadashiv Gopinath
Evaluation of Bond Strength: An In vitro Study using Pro Seal
title Evaluation of Bond Strength: An In vitro Study using Pro Seal
title_full Evaluation of Bond Strength: An In vitro Study using Pro Seal
title_fullStr Evaluation of Bond Strength: An In vitro Study using Pro Seal
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Bond Strength: An In vitro Study using Pro Seal
title_short Evaluation of Bond Strength: An In vitro Study using Pro Seal
title_sort evaluation of bond strength: an in vitro study using pro seal
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214723
work_keys_str_mv AT tarvadesuchitamadhukar evaluationofbondstrengthaninvitrostudyusingproseal
AT deshmukhatulashok evaluationofbondstrengthaninvitrostudyusingproseal
AT daokarsadashivgopinath evaluationofbondstrengthaninvitrostudyusingproseal