Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Restorative Materials Used as Coronal Sealants: An In Vitro Study

BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer cement (GIC), composite resin, gray mineral trioxide aggregate (GMTA) and white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) when placed coronally as double - sealing material over gutta-percha in root...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Divya, K T, Satish, G, Srinivasa, T S, Reddy, Veera, Umashankar, K, Rao, B Mohan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214726
_version_ 1782332645957435392
author Divya, K T
Satish, G
Srinivasa, T S
Reddy, Veera
Umashankar, K
Rao, B Mohan
author_facet Divya, K T
Satish, G
Srinivasa, T S
Reddy, Veera
Umashankar, K
Rao, B Mohan
author_sort Divya, K T
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer cement (GIC), composite resin, gray mineral trioxide aggregate (GMTA) and white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) when placed coronally as double - sealing material over gutta-percha in root canal treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 70 freshly extracted human single rooted teeth were cleaned, shaped and obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus. The gutta-percha was reduced to a depth of 4 mm from the cemento enamel junction using hot plugger and standardized access cavities with 4 mm depth were prepared at the coronal ends of the roots. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups containing 15 teeth each depending on the restorations they received in the coronal cavity. A positive control group of five teeth received no restorative barrier over gutta-percha. All root surfaces were covered with two coats of nail varnish, leaving only the access openings uncovered except teeth in the negative control group, which were completely covered with nail varnish. All teeth were immersed in India ink, cleared and observed under stereomicroscope for the depth of dye penetration. RESULTS: The results were tabulated and analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test and multiple comparison between each group was carried out using Mann-Whitney test. The groups sealed with GMTA and WMTA showed least dye penetration than other groups and the difference was statistically significant. Highest dye penetration was seen with groups sealed with GIC and was statistically significant compared with other three groups. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the GMTA and WMTA provided significantly better coronal seal when compared to other two restorations. The composite resin also showed significantly better seal than the unsealed group and the group sealed GIC, which showed highest leakage that was equivalent to that of unsealed group.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4148566
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41485662014-09-11 Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Restorative Materials Used as Coronal Sealants: An In Vitro Study Divya, K T Satish, G Srinivasa, T S Reddy, Veera Umashankar, K Rao, B Mohan J Int Oral Health Original Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate and compare the sealing ability of glass ionomer cement (GIC), composite resin, gray mineral trioxide aggregate (GMTA) and white mineral trioxide aggregate (WMTA) when placed coronally as double - sealing material over gutta-percha in root canal treated teeth. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A sample of 70 freshly extracted human single rooted teeth were cleaned, shaped and obturated with gutta-percha and AH Plus. The gutta-percha was reduced to a depth of 4 mm from the cemento enamel junction using hot plugger and standardized access cavities with 4 mm depth were prepared at the coronal ends of the roots. The specimens were randomly divided into four groups containing 15 teeth each depending on the restorations they received in the coronal cavity. A positive control group of five teeth received no restorative barrier over gutta-percha. All root surfaces were covered with two coats of nail varnish, leaving only the access openings uncovered except teeth in the negative control group, which were completely covered with nail varnish. All teeth were immersed in India ink, cleared and observed under stereomicroscope for the depth of dye penetration. RESULTS: The results were tabulated and analyzed using Kruskal–Wallis test and multiple comparison between each group was carried out using Mann-Whitney test. The groups sealed with GMTA and WMTA showed least dye penetration than other groups and the difference was statistically significant. Highest dye penetration was seen with groups sealed with GIC and was statistically significant compared with other three groups. CONCLUSION: The results showed that the GMTA and WMTA provided significantly better coronal seal when compared to other two restorations. The composite resin also showed significantly better seal than the unsealed group and the group sealed GIC, which showed highest leakage that was equivalent to that of unsealed group. Dentmedpub Research and Printing Co 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4148566/ /pubmed/25214726 Text en Copyright: © J. Int Oral Health http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Divya, K T
Satish, G
Srinivasa, T S
Reddy, Veera
Umashankar, K
Rao, B Mohan
Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Restorative Materials Used as Coronal Sealants: An In Vitro Study
title Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Restorative Materials Used as Coronal Sealants: An In Vitro Study
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Restorative Materials Used as Coronal Sealants: An In Vitro Study
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Restorative Materials Used as Coronal Sealants: An In Vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Restorative Materials Used as Coronal Sealants: An In Vitro Study
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Sealing Ability of Four Different Restorative Materials Used as Coronal Sealants: An In Vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of sealing ability of four different restorative materials used as coronal sealants: an in vitro study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148566/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25214726
work_keys_str_mv AT divyakt comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsusedascoronalsealantsaninvitrostudy
AT satishg comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsusedascoronalsealantsaninvitrostudy
AT srinivasats comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsusedascoronalsealantsaninvitrostudy
AT reddyveera comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsusedascoronalsealantsaninvitrostudy
AT umashankark comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsusedascoronalsealantsaninvitrostudy
AT raobmohan comparativeevaluationofsealingabilityoffourdifferentrestorativematerialsusedascoronalsealantsaninvitrostudy