Cargando…

A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study

Context: Microleakage around dental restorative materials is a major problem in clinical dentistry. Inspite of many new restorative materials available in the market very few actually bond to the tooth surface. Aims: The aims of this study were: (1) To evaluate and compare the marginal leakage of ne...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yadav, Gunjan, Rehani, Usha, Rana, Vivek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206147
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1145
_version_ 1782332672492699648
author Yadav, Gunjan
Rehani, Usha
Rana, Vivek
author_facet Yadav, Gunjan
Rehani, Usha
Rana, Vivek
author_sort Yadav, Gunjan
collection PubMed
description Context: Microleakage around dental restorative materials is a major problem in clinical dentistry. Inspite of many new restorative materials available in the market very few actually bond to the tooth surface. Aims: The aims of this study were: (1) To evaluate and compare the marginal leakage of newer restorative materials viz colored compomer, ormocer, giomer and RMGIC in class I restoration of deciduous molars. (2) To compare the microleakage scores between the groups of: Colored compomer and ormocer, giomer and RMGIC, ormocer with giomer and RMGIC, giomer with RMGIC. Materials and methods: A total of 40 primary molars were randomly divided into four groups of 10 each. Class I cavities were prepared and the cavities were restored with colored compomer (Group A), Ormocer (Group B), Giomer (Group C) and RMGIC (Group D). The teeth were thermocycled and subjected to 0.5% basic fuchsin dye penetration followed by sectioning. The cut sections were evaluated under a stereomicroscope and the data was subjected to statistical analysis. Statistical analysis used: Mann-Whitney U test and Student t-test. Results: No significant difference was observed when colored compomer was compared to ormocer, giomer and RMGIC. Ormocer showed significantly lower microleakage when compared to giomer. However, no significant difference was observed when ormocer was compared to RMGIC. No significant difference between giomer and RMGIC was found. Conclusion: Ormocer has proven to be an excellent restorative material as it showed least microleakage followed by colored compomer, giomer and RMGIC in increasing order. How to cite this article: Yadav G, Rehani U, Rana V. A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study . Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012;5(2):101-107.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4148735
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41487352014-09-09 A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study Yadav, Gunjan Rehani, Usha Rana, Vivek Int J Clin Pediatr Dent Research Article Context: Microleakage around dental restorative materials is a major problem in clinical dentistry. Inspite of many new restorative materials available in the market very few actually bond to the tooth surface. Aims: The aims of this study were: (1) To evaluate and compare the marginal leakage of newer restorative materials viz colored compomer, ormocer, giomer and RMGIC in class I restoration of deciduous molars. (2) To compare the microleakage scores between the groups of: Colored compomer and ormocer, giomer and RMGIC, ormocer with giomer and RMGIC, giomer with RMGIC. Materials and methods: A total of 40 primary molars were randomly divided into four groups of 10 each. Class I cavities were prepared and the cavities were restored with colored compomer (Group A), Ormocer (Group B), Giomer (Group C) and RMGIC (Group D). The teeth were thermocycled and subjected to 0.5% basic fuchsin dye penetration followed by sectioning. The cut sections were evaluated under a stereomicroscope and the data was subjected to statistical analysis. Statistical analysis used: Mann-Whitney U test and Student t-test. Results: No significant difference was observed when colored compomer was compared to ormocer, giomer and RMGIC. Ormocer showed significantly lower microleakage when compared to giomer. However, no significant difference was observed when ormocer was compared to RMGIC. No significant difference between giomer and RMGIC was found. Conclusion: Ormocer has proven to be an excellent restorative material as it showed least microleakage followed by colored compomer, giomer and RMGIC in increasing order. How to cite this article: Yadav G, Rehani U, Rana V. A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study . Int J Clin Pediatr Dent 2012;5(2):101-107. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2012 2012-08-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4148735/ /pubmed/25206147 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1145 Text en Copyright © 2012; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Research Article
Yadav, Gunjan
Rehani, Usha
Rana, Vivek
A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study
title A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study
title_full A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study
title_fullStr A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study
title_short A Comparative Evaluation of Marginal Leakage of Different Restorative Materials in Deciduous Molars: An in vitro Study
title_sort comparative evaluation of marginal leakage of different restorative materials in deciduous molars: an in vitro study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4148735/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25206147
http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1145
work_keys_str_mv AT yadavgunjan acomparativeevaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferentrestorativematerialsindeciduousmolarsaninvitrostudy
AT rehaniusha acomparativeevaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferentrestorativematerialsindeciduousmolarsaninvitrostudy
AT ranavivek acomparativeevaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferentrestorativematerialsindeciduousmolarsaninvitrostudy
AT yadavgunjan comparativeevaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferentrestorativematerialsindeciduousmolarsaninvitrostudy
AT rehaniusha comparativeevaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferentrestorativematerialsindeciduousmolarsaninvitrostudy
AT ranavivek comparativeevaluationofmarginalleakageofdifferentrestorativematerialsindeciduousmolarsaninvitrostudy