Cargando…

Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations

PURPOSE: Shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) for elderly patients can be challenging. Patients often have a long-standing complex stone burden and significant comorbidities. We report a cohort of patients aged ⩾70 years who were treated by SWL, with special attention to treatment outcomes, complications an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Philippou, Prodromos, Lamrani, D., Moraitis, Konstantinos, Wazait, Hassan, Masood, Junaid, Buchholz, Noor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.009
_version_ 1782332710472122368
author Philippou, Prodromos
Lamrani, D.
Moraitis, Konstantinos
Wazait, Hassan
Masood, Junaid
Buchholz, Noor
author_facet Philippou, Prodromos
Lamrani, D.
Moraitis, Konstantinos
Wazait, Hassan
Masood, Junaid
Buchholz, Noor
author_sort Philippou, Prodromos
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) for elderly patients can be challenging. Patients often have a long-standing complex stone burden and significant comorbidities. We report a cohort of patients aged ⩾70 years who were treated by SWL, with special attention to treatment outcomes, complications and the need for adjuvant procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a period of 4 years, 2311 patients were treated with SWL in a tertiary referral centre. Among these patients, 137 were aged ⩾70 years (5.9%). Patient and stone data were obtained from an electronic database and the patients’ electronic medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: During the pre-procedural assessment, 29 patients (21.2%) were considered to be at high anaesthetic risk, due their comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiology score 3+). In terms of stone burden, 16 stones (11.7%) were located in the distal ureter (mean stone diameter 7.9 mm) and 28 (20.4%) were in the proximal ureter (mean diameter 10.1 mm). In the kidney, 54 stones (39.4%) were in the renal pelvis, upper or mid calyx (mean diameter 10.6 mm), while 39 stones (28.5%) were in the lower calyx (mean diameter 10.1 mm). The median (range) number of SWL sessions per patient was 2.0 (1–3). The overall stone-free rate achieved by SWL alone was 63.5% (65.9% for ureteric stones and 62.4% for renal stones). In total, 38 patients (27.7%) had an adjuvant procedure to achieve stone clearance (ureteroscopy in 23, PCNL in 14 and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in one case). Apart from six cases (4.3%) of ureteric obstruction due to steinstrasse, there were no severe complications noted. CONCLUSIONS: The management of elderly patients presenting with urolithiasis is challenging, due to the presence of significant comorbidities. Careful assessment of an integrated management plan for geriatric patients with urolithiasis is essential, and SWL still remains a safe and efficient first-line tool in well-selected cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149047
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41490472015-11-17 Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations Philippou, Prodromos Lamrani, D. Moraitis, Konstantinos Wazait, Hassan Masood, Junaid Buchholz, Noor Arab J Urol Original Article PURPOSE: Shock-wave lithotripsy (SWL) for elderly patients can be challenging. Patients often have a long-standing complex stone burden and significant comorbidities. We report a cohort of patients aged ⩾70 years who were treated by SWL, with special attention to treatment outcomes, complications and the need for adjuvant procedures. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Over a period of 4 years, 2311 patients were treated with SWL in a tertiary referral centre. Among these patients, 137 were aged ⩾70 years (5.9%). Patient and stone data were obtained from an electronic database and the patients’ electronic medical records were reviewed. RESULTS: During the pre-procedural assessment, 29 patients (21.2%) were considered to be at high anaesthetic risk, due their comorbidities (American Society of Anesthesiology score 3+). In terms of stone burden, 16 stones (11.7%) were located in the distal ureter (mean stone diameter 7.9 mm) and 28 (20.4%) were in the proximal ureter (mean diameter 10.1 mm). In the kidney, 54 stones (39.4%) were in the renal pelvis, upper or mid calyx (mean diameter 10.6 mm), while 39 stones (28.5%) were in the lower calyx (mean diameter 10.1 mm). The median (range) number of SWL sessions per patient was 2.0 (1–3). The overall stone-free rate achieved by SWL alone was 63.5% (65.9% for ureteric stones and 62.4% for renal stones). In total, 38 patients (27.7%) had an adjuvant procedure to achieve stone clearance (ureteroscopy in 23, PCNL in 14 and laparoscopic ureterolithotomy in one case). Apart from six cases (4.3%) of ureteric obstruction due to steinstrasse, there were no severe complications noted. CONCLUSIONS: The management of elderly patients presenting with urolithiasis is challenging, due to the presence of significant comorbidities. Careful assessment of an integrated management plan for geriatric patients with urolithiasis is essential, and SWL still remains a safe and efficient first-line tool in well-selected cases. Elsevier 2011-03 2011-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4149047/ /pubmed/26579264 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.009 Text en © 2011 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Philippou, Prodromos
Lamrani, D.
Moraitis, Konstantinos
Wazait, Hassan
Masood, Junaid
Buchholz, Noor
Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations
title Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations
title_full Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations
title_fullStr Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations
title_full_unstemmed Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations
title_short Shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: Safety, efficacy and special considerations
title_sort shock-wave lithotripsy in the elderly: safety, efficacy and special considerations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149047/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579264
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.009
work_keys_str_mv AT philippouprodromos shockwavelithotripsyintheelderlysafetyefficacyandspecialconsiderations
AT lamranid shockwavelithotripsyintheelderlysafetyefficacyandspecialconsiderations
AT moraitiskonstantinos shockwavelithotripsyintheelderlysafetyefficacyandspecialconsiderations
AT wazaithassan shockwavelithotripsyintheelderlysafetyefficacyandspecialconsiderations
AT masoodjunaid shockwavelithotripsyintheelderlysafetyefficacyandspecialconsiderations
AT buchholznoor shockwavelithotripsyintheelderlysafetyefficacyandspecialconsiderations