Cargando…

Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for distal ureteric calculi (DUC) and to determine variables that could affect the outcome results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2004 and February 2008, 100 patients with a solitary DUC were treated with in si...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abdelghany, Mohammad, Zaher, Tarek, El Halaby, Rafik, Osman, Tarek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.010
_version_ 1782332712118386688
author Abdelghany, Mohammad
Zaher, Tarek
El Halaby, Rafik
Osman, Tarek
author_facet Abdelghany, Mohammad
Zaher, Tarek
El Halaby, Rafik
Osman, Tarek
author_sort Abdelghany, Mohammad
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for distal ureteric calculi (DUC) and to determine variables that could affect the outcome results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2004 and February 2008, 100 patients with a solitary DUC were treated with in situ ESWL using a lithotripter (Lithostar Plus, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The outcome of treatment was evaluated after 3 months. The patients’ clinical and radiological findings, as well as stone characteristics, were reviewed and correlated with the stone-free rate (SFR). RESULTS: After in situ ESWL, 84 patients (84%) were stone-free (after one session in 57 and after two in 27). From a univariate analysis only three factors had a significant impact on the SFR, i.e. the body mass index (BMI), stone length and stone width. The SFR was significantly lower in obese patients than in normal and overweight patients (P = 0.019). Stone width ⩾8 mm was associated with a SFR of 64% (14/22), compared with 89.7% (70/78) for those with a stone width of <8 mm (P = 0.007). The SFR was 86.8% (66/76) for a stone length of ⩽10 mm and 71% (17/24) for a stone length of >10 mm (P = 0.016). On multivariate analysis, BMI, stone width and stone length maintained their statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Primary in situ ESWL remains an effective and safe form of treatment for DUC. The length and transverse diameter of the stone, together with the BMI of the patient, were the only significant predictors of the overall success of ESWL.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149054
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41490542015-11-17 Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success Abdelghany, Mohammad Zaher, Tarek El Halaby, Rafik Osman, Tarek Arab J Urol Original Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) for distal ureteric calculi (DUC) and to determine variables that could affect the outcome results. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between April 2004 and February 2008, 100 patients with a solitary DUC were treated with in situ ESWL using a lithotripter (Lithostar Plus, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany). The outcome of treatment was evaluated after 3 months. The patients’ clinical and radiological findings, as well as stone characteristics, were reviewed and correlated with the stone-free rate (SFR). RESULTS: After in situ ESWL, 84 patients (84%) were stone-free (after one session in 57 and after two in 27). From a univariate analysis only three factors had a significant impact on the SFR, i.e. the body mass index (BMI), stone length and stone width. The SFR was significantly lower in obese patients than in normal and overweight patients (P = 0.019). Stone width ⩾8 mm was associated with a SFR of 64% (14/22), compared with 89.7% (70/78) for those with a stone width of <8 mm (P = 0.007). The SFR was 86.8% (66/76) for a stone length of ⩽10 mm and 71% (17/24) for a stone length of >10 mm (P = 0.016). On multivariate analysis, BMI, stone width and stone length maintained their statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Primary in situ ESWL remains an effective and safe form of treatment for DUC. The length and transverse diameter of the stone, together with the BMI of the patient, were the only significant predictors of the overall success of ESWL. Elsevier 2011-03 2011-05-06 /pmc/articles/PMC4149054/ /pubmed/26579265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.010 Text en © 2011 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Original Article
Abdelghany, Mohammad
Zaher, Tarek
El Halaby, Rafik
Osman, Tarek
Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success
title Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success
title_full Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success
title_fullStr Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success
title_full_unstemmed Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success
title_short Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: Outcome and criteria for success
title_sort extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of lower ureteric stones: outcome and criteria for success
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149054/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579265
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.03.010
work_keys_str_mv AT abdelghanymohammad extracorporealshockwavelithotripsyofloweruretericstonesoutcomeandcriteriaforsuccess
AT zahertarek extracorporealshockwavelithotripsyofloweruretericstonesoutcomeandcriteriaforsuccess
AT elhalabyrafik extracorporealshockwavelithotripsyofloweruretericstonesoutcomeandcriteriaforsuccess
AT osmantarek extracorporealshockwavelithotripsyofloweruretericstonesoutcomeandcriteriaforsuccess