Cargando…

Rural–Urban Differences in Objective and Subjective Measures of Physical Activity: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006

INTRODUCTION: Lower levels of physical activity among rural relative to urban residents have been suggested as an important contributor to rural–urban health disparity; however, empirical evidence is sparse. METHODS: We examined rural–urban differences in 4 objective physical activity measures (2 in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Jessie X., Wen, Ming, Kowaleski-Jones, Lori
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25144676
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140189
_version_ 1782332730455883776
author Fan, Jessie X.
Wen, Ming
Kowaleski-Jones, Lori
author_facet Fan, Jessie X.
Wen, Ming
Kowaleski-Jones, Lori
author_sort Fan, Jessie X.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Lower levels of physical activity among rural relative to urban residents have been suggested as an important contributor to rural–urban health disparity; however, empirical evidence is sparse. METHODS: We examined rural–urban differences in 4 objective physical activity measures (2 intensity thresholds by 2 bout lengths) and 4 subjective measures (total, leisure, household, and transportation) in a nationally representative sample of participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006. The sample comprised 5,056 adults aged 20 to 75 years. Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes were matched with NHANES subjects to identify urban status and 2 types of rural status. Rural–urban and within–rural differences in physical activity were estimated without and with controls for demographic and socioeconomic variables. RESULTS: Rural residents were less active than urban residents in high-intensity long bout (2,020 counts per minute threshold and 10 miniutes or longer bout length) accelerometer-measured physical activity (42.5 ± 6.2 min/wk vs 55.9 ± 2.8 min/wk) but the difference disappeared with a lower-intensity threshold (760 counts per minute). Rural residents reported more total physical activity than urban residents (438.3 ± 35.3min/wk vs 371.2 ± 12.5 min/wk), with differences primarily attributable to household physical activity. Within rural areas, micropolitan residents were less active than residents in smaller rural areas. Controlling for other variables reduced the size of the differences. CONCLUSION: The direction and significance of rural–urban difference in physical activity varied by the method of physical activity measurement, likely related to rural residents spending more time in low-intensity household physical activity but less time in high-intensity physical activity. Micropolitan residents were substantially less active than residents in smaller rural areas, indicating that physical activity did not vary unidirectionally with degree of urbanization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149321
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41493212014-09-10 Rural–Urban Differences in Objective and Subjective Measures of Physical Activity: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006 Fan, Jessie X. Wen, Ming Kowaleski-Jones, Lori Prev Chronic Dis Original Research INTRODUCTION: Lower levels of physical activity among rural relative to urban residents have been suggested as an important contributor to rural–urban health disparity; however, empirical evidence is sparse. METHODS: We examined rural–urban differences in 4 objective physical activity measures (2 intensity thresholds by 2 bout lengths) and 4 subjective measures (total, leisure, household, and transportation) in a nationally representative sample of participants in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006. The sample comprised 5,056 adults aged 20 to 75 years. Rural-Urban Commuting Area (RUCA) codes were matched with NHANES subjects to identify urban status and 2 types of rural status. Rural–urban and within–rural differences in physical activity were estimated without and with controls for demographic and socioeconomic variables. RESULTS: Rural residents were less active than urban residents in high-intensity long bout (2,020 counts per minute threshold and 10 miniutes or longer bout length) accelerometer-measured physical activity (42.5 ± 6.2 min/wk vs 55.9 ± 2.8 min/wk) but the difference disappeared with a lower-intensity threshold (760 counts per minute). Rural residents reported more total physical activity than urban residents (438.3 ± 35.3min/wk vs 371.2 ± 12.5 min/wk), with differences primarily attributable to household physical activity. Within rural areas, micropolitan residents were less active than residents in smaller rural areas. Controlling for other variables reduced the size of the differences. CONCLUSION: The direction and significance of rural–urban difference in physical activity varied by the method of physical activity measurement, likely related to rural residents spending more time in low-intensity household physical activity but less time in high-intensity physical activity. Micropolitan residents were substantially less active than residents in smaller rural areas, indicating that physical activity did not vary unidirectionally with degree of urbanization. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2014-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4149321/ /pubmed/25144676 http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140189 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is a publication of the U.S. Government. This publication is in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from this work may be reprinted freely. Use of these materials should be properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fan, Jessie X.
Wen, Ming
Kowaleski-Jones, Lori
Rural–Urban Differences in Objective and Subjective Measures of Physical Activity: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006
title Rural–Urban Differences in Objective and Subjective Measures of Physical Activity: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006
title_full Rural–Urban Differences in Objective and Subjective Measures of Physical Activity: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006
title_fullStr Rural–Urban Differences in Objective and Subjective Measures of Physical Activity: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006
title_full_unstemmed Rural–Urban Differences in Objective and Subjective Measures of Physical Activity: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006
title_short Rural–Urban Differences in Objective and Subjective Measures of Physical Activity: Findings From the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2003–2006
title_sort rural–urban differences in objective and subjective measures of physical activity: findings from the national health and nutrition examination survey (nhanes) 2003–2006
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149321/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25144676
http://dx.doi.org/10.5888/pcd11.140189
work_keys_str_mv AT fanjessiex ruralurbandifferencesinobjectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofphysicalactivityfindingsfromthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurveynhanes20032006
AT wenming ruralurbandifferencesinobjectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofphysicalactivityfindingsfromthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurveynhanes20032006
AT kowaleskijoneslori ruralurbandifferencesinobjectiveandsubjectivemeasuresofphysicalactivityfindingsfromthenationalhealthandnutritionexaminationsurveynhanes20032006