Cargando…

Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene amplification has been reported in different types of cancer. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterize the prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with cancer. METHODS: A search of several databases, in...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chang, Jinjia, Liu, Xinyang, Wang, Shanshan, Zhang, Zhe, Wu, Zheng, Zhang, Xiaowei, Li, Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25171497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105524
_version_ 1782332740760240128
author Chang, Jinjia
Liu, Xinyang
Wang, Shanshan
Zhang, Zhe
Wu, Zheng
Zhang, Xiaowei
Li, Jin
author_facet Chang, Jinjia
Liu, Xinyang
Wang, Shanshan
Zhang, Zhe
Wu, Zheng
Zhang, Xiaowei
Li, Jin
author_sort Chang, Jinjia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene amplification has been reported in different types of cancer. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterize the prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with cancer. METHODS: A search of several databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, was conducted to identify studies examining the association between FGFR gene amplification and cancer. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, and overall incidence rates, hazard risk (HR), overall survival, disease-free survival, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of 24 studies, the prevalence of FGFR gene amplification was FGFR1: 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08–0.13) and FGFR2: 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02–0.06). Overall survival was significantly worse among patients with FGFR gene amplification: FGFR1 [HR 1.57 (95% CI: 1.23–1.99); p = 0.0002] and FGFR2 [HR 2.27 (95% CI: 1.73–3.00); p<0.00001]. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports the conclusion that the outcomes of patients with FGFR gene amplified cancers is worse than for those with non-FGFR gene amplified cancers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149366
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41493662014-09-03 Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Chang, Jinjia Liu, Xinyang Wang, Shanshan Zhang, Zhe Wu, Zheng Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Jin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene amplification has been reported in different types of cancer. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterize the prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with cancer. METHODS: A search of several databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, was conducted to identify studies examining the association between FGFR gene amplification and cancer. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, and overall incidence rates, hazard risk (HR), overall survival, disease-free survival, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of 24 studies, the prevalence of FGFR gene amplification was FGFR1: 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08–0.13) and FGFR2: 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02–0.06). Overall survival was significantly worse among patients with FGFR gene amplification: FGFR1 [HR 1.57 (95% CI: 1.23–1.99); p = 0.0002] and FGFR2 [HR 2.27 (95% CI: 1.73–3.00); p<0.00001]. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports the conclusion that the outcomes of patients with FGFR gene amplified cancers is worse than for those with non-FGFR gene amplified cancers. Public Library of Science 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4149366/ /pubmed/25171497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105524 Text en © 2014 Chang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Chang, Jinjia
Liu, Xinyang
Wang, Shanshan
Zhang, Zhe
Wu, Zheng
Zhang, Xiaowei
Li, Jin
Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prognostic value of fgfr gene amplification in patients with different types of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149366/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25171497
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105524
work_keys_str_mv AT changjinjia prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT liuxinyang prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wangshanshan prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangzhe prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT wuzheng prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT zhangxiaowei prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT lijin prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis