Cargando…
Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene amplification has been reported in different types of cancer. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterize the prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with cancer. METHODS: A search of several databases, in...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25171497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105524 |
_version_ | 1782332740760240128 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Jinjia Liu, Xinyang Wang, Shanshan Zhang, Zhe Wu, Zheng Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Jin |
author_facet | Chang, Jinjia Liu, Xinyang Wang, Shanshan Zhang, Zhe Wu, Zheng Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Jin |
author_sort | Chang, Jinjia |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene amplification has been reported in different types of cancer. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterize the prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with cancer. METHODS: A search of several databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, was conducted to identify studies examining the association between FGFR gene amplification and cancer. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, and overall incidence rates, hazard risk (HR), overall survival, disease-free survival, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of 24 studies, the prevalence of FGFR gene amplification was FGFR1: 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08–0.13) and FGFR2: 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02–0.06). Overall survival was significantly worse among patients with FGFR gene amplification: FGFR1 [HR 1.57 (95% CI: 1.23–1.99); p = 0.0002] and FGFR2 [HR 2.27 (95% CI: 1.73–3.00); p<0.00001]. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports the conclusion that the outcomes of patients with FGFR gene amplified cancers is worse than for those with non-FGFR gene amplified cancers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4149366 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41493662014-09-03 Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Chang, Jinjia Liu, Xinyang Wang, Shanshan Zhang, Zhe Wu, Zheng Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Jin PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) gene amplification has been reported in different types of cancer. We performed an up-to-date meta-analysis to further characterize the prognostic value of FGFR gene amplification in patients with cancer. METHODS: A search of several databases, including MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, was conducted to identify studies examining the association between FGFR gene amplification and cancer. A total of 24 studies met the inclusion criteria, and overall incidence rates, hazard risk (HR), overall survival, disease-free survival, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated employing fixed- or random-effects models depending on the heterogeneity of the included studies. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of 24 studies, the prevalence of FGFR gene amplification was FGFR1: 0.11 (95% CI: 0.08–0.13) and FGFR2: 0.04 (95% CI: 0.02–0.06). Overall survival was significantly worse among patients with FGFR gene amplification: FGFR1 [HR 1.57 (95% CI: 1.23–1.99); p = 0.0002] and FGFR2 [HR 2.27 (95% CI: 1.73–3.00); p<0.00001]. CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence supports the conclusion that the outcomes of patients with FGFR gene amplified cancers is worse than for those with non-FGFR gene amplified cancers. Public Library of Science 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4149366/ /pubmed/25171497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105524 Text en © 2014 Chang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chang, Jinjia Liu, Xinyang Wang, Shanshan Zhang, Zhe Wu, Zheng Zhang, Xiaowei Li, Jin Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Prognostic Value of FGFR Gene Amplification in Patients with Different Types of Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | prognostic value of fgfr gene amplification in patients with different types of cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149366/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25171497 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105524 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changjinjia prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT liuxinyang prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wangshanshan prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangzhe prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT wuzheng prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT zhangxiaowei prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT lijin prognosticvalueoffgfrgeneamplificationinpatientswithdifferenttypesofcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |