Cargando…

(GTG)(5) MSP-PCR Fingerprinting as a Technique for Discrimination of Wine Associated Yeasts?

In microbiology, identification of all isolates by sequencing is still unfeasible in small research laboratories. Therefore, many yeast diversity studies follow a screening procedure consisting of clustering the yeast isolates using MSP-PCR fingerprinting, followed by identification of one or a few...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ramírez-Castrillón, Mauricio, Mendes, Sandra Denise Camargo, Inostroza-Ponta, Mario, Valente, Patricia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25171185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105870
_version_ 1782332762033750016
author Ramírez-Castrillón, Mauricio
Mendes, Sandra Denise Camargo
Inostroza-Ponta, Mario
Valente, Patricia
author_facet Ramírez-Castrillón, Mauricio
Mendes, Sandra Denise Camargo
Inostroza-Ponta, Mario
Valente, Patricia
author_sort Ramírez-Castrillón, Mauricio
collection PubMed
description In microbiology, identification of all isolates by sequencing is still unfeasible in small research laboratories. Therefore, many yeast diversity studies follow a screening procedure consisting of clustering the yeast isolates using MSP-PCR fingerprinting, followed by identification of one or a few selected representatives of each cluster by sequencing. Although this procedure has been widely applied in the literature, it has not been properly validated. We evaluated a standardized protocol using MSP-PCR fingerprinting with the primers (GTG)(5) and M13 for the discrimination of wine associated yeasts in South Brazil. Two datasets were used: yeasts isolated from bottled wines and vineyard environments. We compared the discriminatory power of both primers in a subset of 16 strains, choosing the primer (GTG)(5) for further evaluation. Afterwards, we applied this technique to 245 strains, and compared the results with the identification obtained by partial sequencing of the LSU rRNA gene, considered as the gold standard. An array matrix was constructed for each dataset and used as input for clustering with two methods (hierarchical dendrograms and QAPGrid layout). For both yeast datasets, unrelated species were clustered in the same group. The sensitivity score of (GTG)(5) MSP-PCR fingerprinting was high, but specificity was low. As a conclusion, the yeast diversity inferred in several previous studies may have been underestimated and some isolates were probably misidentified due to the compliance to this screening procedure.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149466
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41494662014-09-03 (GTG)(5) MSP-PCR Fingerprinting as a Technique for Discrimination of Wine Associated Yeasts? Ramírez-Castrillón, Mauricio Mendes, Sandra Denise Camargo Inostroza-Ponta, Mario Valente, Patricia PLoS One Research Article In microbiology, identification of all isolates by sequencing is still unfeasible in small research laboratories. Therefore, many yeast diversity studies follow a screening procedure consisting of clustering the yeast isolates using MSP-PCR fingerprinting, followed by identification of one or a few selected representatives of each cluster by sequencing. Although this procedure has been widely applied in the literature, it has not been properly validated. We evaluated a standardized protocol using MSP-PCR fingerprinting with the primers (GTG)(5) and M13 for the discrimination of wine associated yeasts in South Brazil. Two datasets were used: yeasts isolated from bottled wines and vineyard environments. We compared the discriminatory power of both primers in a subset of 16 strains, choosing the primer (GTG)(5) for further evaluation. Afterwards, we applied this technique to 245 strains, and compared the results with the identification obtained by partial sequencing of the LSU rRNA gene, considered as the gold standard. An array matrix was constructed for each dataset and used as input for clustering with two methods (hierarchical dendrograms and QAPGrid layout). For both yeast datasets, unrelated species were clustered in the same group. The sensitivity score of (GTG)(5) MSP-PCR fingerprinting was high, but specificity was low. As a conclusion, the yeast diversity inferred in several previous studies may have been underestimated and some isolates were probably misidentified due to the compliance to this screening procedure. Public Library of Science 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4149466/ /pubmed/25171185 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105870 Text en © 2014 Ramírez-Castrillón et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ramírez-Castrillón, Mauricio
Mendes, Sandra Denise Camargo
Inostroza-Ponta, Mario
Valente, Patricia
(GTG)(5) MSP-PCR Fingerprinting as a Technique for Discrimination of Wine Associated Yeasts?
title (GTG)(5) MSP-PCR Fingerprinting as a Technique for Discrimination of Wine Associated Yeasts?
title_full (GTG)(5) MSP-PCR Fingerprinting as a Technique for Discrimination of Wine Associated Yeasts?
title_fullStr (GTG)(5) MSP-PCR Fingerprinting as a Technique for Discrimination of Wine Associated Yeasts?
title_full_unstemmed (GTG)(5) MSP-PCR Fingerprinting as a Technique for Discrimination of Wine Associated Yeasts?
title_short (GTG)(5) MSP-PCR Fingerprinting as a Technique for Discrimination of Wine Associated Yeasts?
title_sort (gtg)(5) msp-pcr fingerprinting as a technique for discrimination of wine associated yeasts?
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149466/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25171185
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105870
work_keys_str_mv AT ramirezcastrillonmauricio gtg5msppcrfingerprintingasatechniquefordiscriminationofwineassociatedyeasts
AT mendessandradenisecamargo gtg5msppcrfingerprintingasatechniquefordiscriminationofwineassociatedyeasts
AT inostrozapontamario gtg5msppcrfingerprintingasatechniquefordiscriminationofwineassociatedyeasts
AT valentepatricia gtg5msppcrfingerprintingasatechniquefordiscriminationofwineassociatedyeasts