Cargando…

Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Mortality in Florida Colorectal Cancer Patients

PURPOSE: We examined individual-level and neighborhood-level predictors of mortality in CRC patients diagnosed in Florida to identify high-risk groups for targeted interventions. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data from the Florida Cancer Data System registry (2007–2011) were linked with Agency f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tannenbaum, Stacey L., Hernandez, Monique, Zheng, D. Dandan, Sussman, Daniel A., Lee, David J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106322
_version_ 1782332779313233920
author Tannenbaum, Stacey L.
Hernandez, Monique
Zheng, D. Dandan
Sussman, Daniel A.
Lee, David J.
author_facet Tannenbaum, Stacey L.
Hernandez, Monique
Zheng, D. Dandan
Sussman, Daniel A.
Lee, David J.
author_sort Tannenbaum, Stacey L.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: We examined individual-level and neighborhood-level predictors of mortality in CRC patients diagnosed in Florida to identify high-risk groups for targeted interventions. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data from the Florida Cancer Data System registry (2007–2011) were linked with Agency for Health Care Administration and US Census data (n = 47,872). Cox hazard regression models were fitted with candidate predictors of CRC survival and stratified by age group (18–49, 50–64, 65+). RESULTS: Stratified by age group, higher mortality risk per comorbidity was found among youngest (21%), followed by middle (19%), and then oldest (14%) age groups. The two younger age groups had higher mortality risk with proximal compared to those with distal cancer. Compared with private insurance, those in the middle age group were at higher death risk if not insured (HR = 1.35), or received healthcare through Medicare (HR = 1.44), Medicaid (HR = 1.53), or the Veteran’s Administration (HR = 1.26). Only Medicaid in the youngest (52% higher risk) and those not insured in the oldest group (24% lower risk) were significantly different from their privately insured counterparts. Among 18–49 and 50–64 age groups there was a higher mortality risk among the lowest SES (1.17- and 1.23-fold higher in the middle age and 1.12- and 1.17-fold higher in the older age group, respectively) compared to highest SES. Married patients were significantly better off than divorced/separated (HR = 1.22), single (HR = 1.29), or widowed (HR = 1.19) patients. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with increased risk for mortality among individuals with CRC included being older, uninsured, unmarried, more comorbidities, living in lower SES neighborhoods, and diagnosed at later disease stage. Higher risk among younger patients was attributed to proximal cancer site, Medicaid, and distant disease; however, lower SES and being unmarried were not risk factors in this age group. Targeted interventions to improve survivorship and greater social support while considering age classification may assist these high-risk groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149543
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41495432014-09-03 Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Mortality in Florida Colorectal Cancer Patients Tannenbaum, Stacey L. Hernandez, Monique Zheng, D. Dandan Sussman, Daniel A. Lee, David J. PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: We examined individual-level and neighborhood-level predictors of mortality in CRC patients diagnosed in Florida to identify high-risk groups for targeted interventions. METHODS: Demographic and clinical data from the Florida Cancer Data System registry (2007–2011) were linked with Agency for Health Care Administration and US Census data (n = 47,872). Cox hazard regression models were fitted with candidate predictors of CRC survival and stratified by age group (18–49, 50–64, 65+). RESULTS: Stratified by age group, higher mortality risk per comorbidity was found among youngest (21%), followed by middle (19%), and then oldest (14%) age groups. The two younger age groups had higher mortality risk with proximal compared to those with distal cancer. Compared with private insurance, those in the middle age group were at higher death risk if not insured (HR = 1.35), or received healthcare through Medicare (HR = 1.44), Medicaid (HR = 1.53), or the Veteran’s Administration (HR = 1.26). Only Medicaid in the youngest (52% higher risk) and those not insured in the oldest group (24% lower risk) were significantly different from their privately insured counterparts. Among 18–49 and 50–64 age groups there was a higher mortality risk among the lowest SES (1.17- and 1.23-fold higher in the middle age and 1.12- and 1.17-fold higher in the older age group, respectively) compared to highest SES. Married patients were significantly better off than divorced/separated (HR = 1.22), single (HR = 1.29), or widowed (HR = 1.19) patients. CONCLUSION: Factors associated with increased risk for mortality among individuals with CRC included being older, uninsured, unmarried, more comorbidities, living in lower SES neighborhoods, and diagnosed at later disease stage. Higher risk among younger patients was attributed to proximal cancer site, Medicaid, and distant disease; however, lower SES and being unmarried were not risk factors in this age group. Targeted interventions to improve survivorship and greater social support while considering age classification may assist these high-risk groups. Public Library of Science 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4149543/ /pubmed/25170910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106322 Text en © 2014 Tannenbaum et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Tannenbaum, Stacey L.
Hernandez, Monique
Zheng, D. Dandan
Sussman, Daniel A.
Lee, David J.
Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Mortality in Florida Colorectal Cancer Patients
title Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Mortality in Florida Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_full Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Mortality in Florida Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_fullStr Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Mortality in Florida Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_full_unstemmed Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Mortality in Florida Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_short Individual- and Neighborhood-Level Predictors of Mortality in Florida Colorectal Cancer Patients
title_sort individual- and neighborhood-level predictors of mortality in florida colorectal cancer patients
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149543/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106322
work_keys_str_mv AT tannenbaumstaceyl individualandneighborhoodlevelpredictorsofmortalityinfloridacolorectalcancerpatients
AT hernandezmonique individualandneighborhoodlevelpredictorsofmortalityinfloridacolorectalcancerpatients
AT zhengddandan individualandneighborhoodlevelpredictorsofmortalityinfloridacolorectalcancerpatients
AT sussmandaniela individualandneighborhoodlevelpredictorsofmortalityinfloridacolorectalcancerpatients
AT leedavidj individualandneighborhoodlevelpredictorsofmortalityinfloridacolorectalcancerpatients