Cargando…
The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health
BACKGROUND: NRTI-sparing regimens may avoid long-term mitochondrial, bone and renal toxicities and maintain viral suppression. METHODS: In the RADAR study, 85 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients were randomized to receive either raltegravir (RAL) (n = 42) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106221 |
_version_ | 1782332783163604992 |
---|---|
author | Bedimo, Roger J. Drechsler, Henning Jain, Mamta Cutrell, James Zhang, Song Li, Xilong Farukhi, Irfan Castanon, Rosinda Tebas, Pablo Maalouf, Naim M. |
author_facet | Bedimo, Roger J. Drechsler, Henning Jain, Mamta Cutrell, James Zhang, Song Li, Xilong Farukhi, Irfan Castanon, Rosinda Tebas, Pablo Maalouf, Naim M. |
author_sort | Bedimo, Roger J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: NRTI-sparing regimens may avoid long-term mitochondrial, bone and renal toxicities and maintain viral suppression. METHODS: In the RADAR study, 85 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients were randomized to receive either raltegravir (RAL) (n = 42) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (n = 43), each with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r). Virologic efficacy was assessed at weeks 24 and 48. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at baseline and week 48, and bone turnover markers (BTM) assessed at weeks 0, 16 and 48. RESULTS: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, 62.5% of RAL subjects and 83.7% of TDF/FTC subjects were responders (VL<48 copies/mL) at week 48 (p = 0.045; chi-square test). The proportions of patients achieving VL<200 copies/mL were similar: 72.5% and 86.0% (p = 0.175). Premature treatment discontinuation was the main cause for failure. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed. Changes from baseline in RAL vs. TDF/FTC for CD4(+) (+199 vs. +216 cells/µL, p = 0.63), total cholesterol/HDL (−0.25 vs. −0.71 mg/dL (p = 0.270), and eGFR (−4.4 vs. −7.9 ml/min, p = 0.44) were comparable between groups. Changes in subtotal BMD to week 48 were: +9.2 with RAL vs. −7 g/cm(2) with TDF/FTC (p = 0.002). Mean CTX changes were +0.04 vs. +0.24 ng/mL (p = 0.001), and mean P1NP changes were +3.59 vs. +30.09 ng/mL (p = 0.023). BTM changes at week 16 predicted change in BMD by week 48 (R = −0.394, p = 0.003 for CTX; and R = −0.477, p<0.001 for P1NP). CONCLUSION: The NRTI-sparing regimen RAL+DRV/r did not achieve similar week 48 virologic efficacy compared with TDF/FTC+DRV/r, but was better with regard to markers of bone health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00677300 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4149560 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41495602014-09-03 The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health Bedimo, Roger J. Drechsler, Henning Jain, Mamta Cutrell, James Zhang, Song Li, Xilong Farukhi, Irfan Castanon, Rosinda Tebas, Pablo Maalouf, Naim M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: NRTI-sparing regimens may avoid long-term mitochondrial, bone and renal toxicities and maintain viral suppression. METHODS: In the RADAR study, 85 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients were randomized to receive either raltegravir (RAL) (n = 42) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (n = 43), each with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r). Virologic efficacy was assessed at weeks 24 and 48. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at baseline and week 48, and bone turnover markers (BTM) assessed at weeks 0, 16 and 48. RESULTS: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, 62.5% of RAL subjects and 83.7% of TDF/FTC subjects were responders (VL<48 copies/mL) at week 48 (p = 0.045; chi-square test). The proportions of patients achieving VL<200 copies/mL were similar: 72.5% and 86.0% (p = 0.175). Premature treatment discontinuation was the main cause for failure. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed. Changes from baseline in RAL vs. TDF/FTC for CD4(+) (+199 vs. +216 cells/µL, p = 0.63), total cholesterol/HDL (−0.25 vs. −0.71 mg/dL (p = 0.270), and eGFR (−4.4 vs. −7.9 ml/min, p = 0.44) were comparable between groups. Changes in subtotal BMD to week 48 were: +9.2 with RAL vs. −7 g/cm(2) with TDF/FTC (p = 0.002). Mean CTX changes were +0.04 vs. +0.24 ng/mL (p = 0.001), and mean P1NP changes were +3.59 vs. +30.09 ng/mL (p = 0.023). BTM changes at week 16 predicted change in BMD by week 48 (R = −0.394, p = 0.003 for CTX; and R = −0.477, p<0.001 for P1NP). CONCLUSION: The NRTI-sparing regimen RAL+DRV/r did not achieve similar week 48 virologic efficacy compared with TDF/FTC+DRV/r, but was better with regard to markers of bone health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00677300 Public Library of Science 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4149560/ /pubmed/25170938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106221 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Bedimo, Roger J. Drechsler, Henning Jain, Mamta Cutrell, James Zhang, Song Li, Xilong Farukhi, Irfan Castanon, Rosinda Tebas, Pablo Maalouf, Naim M. The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health |
title | The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health |
title_full | The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health |
title_fullStr | The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health |
title_full_unstemmed | The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health |
title_short | The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health |
title_sort | radar study: week 48 safety and efficacy of raltegravir combined with boosted darunavir compared to tenofovir/emtricitabine combined with boosted darunavir in antiretroviral-naive patients. impact on bone health |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149560/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106221 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bedimorogerj theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT drechslerhenning theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT jainmamta theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT cutrelljames theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT zhangsong theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT lixilong theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT farukhiirfan theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT castanonrosinda theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT tebaspablo theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT maaloufnaimm theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT bedimorogerj radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT drechslerhenning radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT jainmamta radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT cutrelljames radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT zhangsong radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT lixilong radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT farukhiirfan radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT castanonrosinda radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT tebaspablo radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth AT maaloufnaimm radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth |