Cargando…

The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health

BACKGROUND: NRTI-sparing regimens may avoid long-term mitochondrial, bone and renal toxicities and maintain viral suppression. METHODS: In the RADAR study, 85 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients were randomized to receive either raltegravir (RAL) (n = 42) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bedimo, Roger J., Drechsler, Henning, Jain, Mamta, Cutrell, James, Zhang, Song, Li, Xilong, Farukhi, Irfan, Castanon, Rosinda, Tebas, Pablo, Maalouf, Naim M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106221
_version_ 1782332783163604992
author Bedimo, Roger J.
Drechsler, Henning
Jain, Mamta
Cutrell, James
Zhang, Song
Li, Xilong
Farukhi, Irfan
Castanon, Rosinda
Tebas, Pablo
Maalouf, Naim M.
author_facet Bedimo, Roger J.
Drechsler, Henning
Jain, Mamta
Cutrell, James
Zhang, Song
Li, Xilong
Farukhi, Irfan
Castanon, Rosinda
Tebas, Pablo
Maalouf, Naim M.
author_sort Bedimo, Roger J.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: NRTI-sparing regimens may avoid long-term mitochondrial, bone and renal toxicities and maintain viral suppression. METHODS: In the RADAR study, 85 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients were randomized to receive either raltegravir (RAL) (n = 42) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (n = 43), each with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r). Virologic efficacy was assessed at weeks 24 and 48. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at baseline and week 48, and bone turnover markers (BTM) assessed at weeks 0, 16 and 48. RESULTS: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, 62.5% of RAL subjects and 83.7% of TDF/FTC subjects were responders (VL<48 copies/mL) at week 48 (p = 0.045; chi-square test). The proportions of patients achieving VL<200 copies/mL were similar: 72.5% and 86.0% (p = 0.175). Premature treatment discontinuation was the main cause for failure. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed. Changes from baseline in RAL vs. TDF/FTC for CD4(+) (+199 vs. +216 cells/µL, p = 0.63), total cholesterol/HDL (−0.25 vs. −0.71 mg/dL (p = 0.270), and eGFR (−4.4 vs. −7.9 ml/min, p = 0.44) were comparable between groups. Changes in subtotal BMD to week 48 were: +9.2 with RAL vs. −7 g/cm(2) with TDF/FTC (p = 0.002). Mean CTX changes were +0.04 vs. +0.24 ng/mL (p = 0.001), and mean P1NP changes were +3.59 vs. +30.09 ng/mL (p = 0.023). BTM changes at week 16 predicted change in BMD by week 48 (R = −0.394, p = 0.003 for CTX; and R = −0.477, p<0.001 for P1NP). CONCLUSION: The NRTI-sparing regimen RAL+DRV/r did not achieve similar week 48 virologic efficacy compared with TDF/FTC+DRV/r, but was better with regard to markers of bone health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00677300
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149560
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41495602014-09-03 The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health Bedimo, Roger J. Drechsler, Henning Jain, Mamta Cutrell, James Zhang, Song Li, Xilong Farukhi, Irfan Castanon, Rosinda Tebas, Pablo Maalouf, Naim M. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: NRTI-sparing regimens may avoid long-term mitochondrial, bone and renal toxicities and maintain viral suppression. METHODS: In the RADAR study, 85 antiretroviral-naïve HIV-infected patients were randomized to receive either raltegravir (RAL) (n = 42) or tenofovir/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) (n = 43), each with ritonavir-boosted darunavir (DRV/r). Virologic efficacy was assessed at weeks 24 and 48. Bone mineral density (BMD) was assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) scan at baseline and week 48, and bone turnover markers (BTM) assessed at weeks 0, 16 and 48. RESULTS: Using an intention-to-treat analysis, 62.5% of RAL subjects and 83.7% of TDF/FTC subjects were responders (VL<48 copies/mL) at week 48 (p = 0.045; chi-square test). The proportions of patients achieving VL<200 copies/mL were similar: 72.5% and 86.0% (p = 0.175). Premature treatment discontinuation was the main cause for failure. No treatment-emergent resistance was observed. Changes from baseline in RAL vs. TDF/FTC for CD4(+) (+199 vs. +216 cells/µL, p = 0.63), total cholesterol/HDL (−0.25 vs. −0.71 mg/dL (p = 0.270), and eGFR (−4.4 vs. −7.9 ml/min, p = 0.44) were comparable between groups. Changes in subtotal BMD to week 48 were: +9.2 with RAL vs. −7 g/cm(2) with TDF/FTC (p = 0.002). Mean CTX changes were +0.04 vs. +0.24 ng/mL (p = 0.001), and mean P1NP changes were +3.59 vs. +30.09 ng/mL (p = 0.023). BTM changes at week 16 predicted change in BMD by week 48 (R = −0.394, p = 0.003 for CTX; and R = −0.477, p<0.001 for P1NP). CONCLUSION: The NRTI-sparing regimen RAL+DRV/r did not achieve similar week 48 virologic efficacy compared with TDF/FTC+DRV/r, but was better with regard to markers of bone health. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT 00677300 Public Library of Science 2014-08-29 /pmc/articles/PMC4149560/ /pubmed/25170938 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106221 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Bedimo, Roger J.
Drechsler, Henning
Jain, Mamta
Cutrell, James
Zhang, Song
Li, Xilong
Farukhi, Irfan
Castanon, Rosinda
Tebas, Pablo
Maalouf, Naim M.
The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health
title The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health
title_full The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health
title_fullStr The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health
title_full_unstemmed The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health
title_short The RADAR Study: Week 48 Safety and Efficacy of RAltegravir Combined with Boosted DARunavir Compared to Tenofovir/Emtricitabine Combined with Boosted Darunavir in Antiretroviral-Naive Patients. Impact on Bone Health
title_sort radar study: week 48 safety and efficacy of raltegravir combined with boosted darunavir compared to tenofovir/emtricitabine combined with boosted darunavir in antiretroviral-naive patients. impact on bone health
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149560/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25170938
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106221
work_keys_str_mv AT bedimorogerj theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT drechslerhenning theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT jainmamta theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT cutrelljames theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT zhangsong theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT lixilong theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT farukhiirfan theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT castanonrosinda theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT tebaspablo theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT maaloufnaimm theradarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT bedimorogerj radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT drechslerhenning radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT jainmamta radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT cutrelljames radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT zhangsong radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT lixilong radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT farukhiirfan radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT castanonrosinda radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT tebaspablo radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth
AT maaloufnaimm radarstudyweek48safetyandefficacyofraltegravircombinedwithboosteddarunavircomparedtotenofoviremtricitabinecombinedwithboosteddarunavirinantiretroviralnaivepatientsimpactonbonehealth