Cargando…

An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea

INTRODUCTION: To estimate the post-campaign level of measles vaccination coverage in Guinea. METHODS: Interview of parents and observation of measles vaccination cards of children aged 9 to 59 months during the mass measles campaign. A nationwide cluster randomized sample under health District strat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou, Malano, Emmanuel Roland, Diallo, Ibrahima Telly, Sirimah, Camara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The African Field Epidemiology Network 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184021
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.4.2475
_version_ 1782332817137467392
author Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou
Malano, Emmanuel Roland
Diallo, Ibrahima Telly
Sirimah, Camara
author_facet Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou
Malano, Emmanuel Roland
Diallo, Ibrahima Telly
Sirimah, Camara
author_sort Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To estimate the post-campaign level of measles vaccination coverage in Guinea. METHODS: Interview of parents and observation of measles vaccination cards of children aged 9 to 59 months during the mass measles campaign. A nationwide cluster randomized sample under health District stratification. RESULTS: 64.2% (95%CI = 60.9% to 67.4%) of children were vaccinated and had their measles vaccination card. With respect to card and history 90.5% (95%CI = 88.3% to 92.3%) were vaccinated. The estimation was found to be between 72.7% and 81.9%. Coverage with card increased from 55.5% to 79.30% with the level of education of parents but that was not statistically significant, (X(2)(trend) =3.087 P= 0.07). However coverage with card significantly increased with profession from 55.1% for farmers followed by 59.2% for other manual workers to 73.8% for sellers, ending by 74.5% for settled technicians (X(2) (trend) =12.16 P= 0.0005). For unvaccinated children, lack of information accounted for the main reason (37.03%) followed by parents’ occupation (23.45%), parents’ sickness (8.6%), children's sickness (4.9%) and others including vaccinators absent in the post or parents’ belief that it was a door to door campaign. CONCLUSION: The mass measles vaccination campaign achieved an approximate coverage of 75%. Although not enough for effective control of measles, it has covered an important gap left over by the routine immunization coverage 42%. Appropriate measures are needed to improve coverage in routine immunization and specific actions should be taken to target farmers and other manual workers’ families but also uneducated groups for both routine immunization and mass campaigns.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149790
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The African Field Epidemiology Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41497902014-09-02 An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou Malano, Emmanuel Roland Diallo, Ibrahima Telly Sirimah, Camara Pan Afr Med J Research INTRODUCTION: To estimate the post-campaign level of measles vaccination coverage in Guinea. METHODS: Interview of parents and observation of measles vaccination cards of children aged 9 to 59 months during the mass measles campaign. A nationwide cluster randomized sample under health District stratification. RESULTS: 64.2% (95%CI = 60.9% to 67.4%) of children were vaccinated and had their measles vaccination card. With respect to card and history 90.5% (95%CI = 88.3% to 92.3%) were vaccinated. The estimation was found to be between 72.7% and 81.9%. Coverage with card increased from 55.5% to 79.30% with the level of education of parents but that was not statistically significant, (X(2)(trend) =3.087 P= 0.07). However coverage with card significantly increased with profession from 55.1% for farmers followed by 59.2% for other manual workers to 73.8% for sellers, ending by 74.5% for settled technicians (X(2) (trend) =12.16 P= 0.0005). For unvaccinated children, lack of information accounted for the main reason (37.03%) followed by parents’ occupation (23.45%), parents’ sickness (8.6%), children's sickness (4.9%) and others including vaccinators absent in the post or parents’ belief that it was a door to door campaign. CONCLUSION: The mass measles vaccination campaign achieved an approximate coverage of 75%. Although not enough for effective control of measles, it has covered an important gap left over by the routine immunization coverage 42%. Appropriate measures are needed to improve coverage in routine immunization and specific actions should be taken to target farmers and other manual workers’ families but also uneducated groups for both routine immunization and mass campaigns. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2014-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4149790/ /pubmed/25184021 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.4.2475 Text en © Jean Gerard Tatou Doumtsop et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou
Malano, Emmanuel Roland
Diallo, Ibrahima Telly
Sirimah, Camara
An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea
title An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea
title_full An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea
title_fullStr An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea
title_short An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea
title_sort evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in guinea
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149790/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184021
http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.4.2475
work_keys_str_mv AT doumtsopjeangerardtatou anevaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea
AT malanoemmanuelroland anevaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea
AT dialloibrahimatelly anevaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea
AT sirimahcamara anevaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea
AT doumtsopjeangerardtatou evaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea
AT malanoemmanuelroland evaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea
AT dialloibrahimatelly evaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea
AT sirimahcamara evaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea