Cargando…
An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea
INTRODUCTION: To estimate the post-campaign level of measles vaccination coverage in Guinea. METHODS: Interview of parents and observation of measles vaccination cards of children aged 9 to 59 months during the mass measles campaign. A nationwide cluster randomized sample under health District strat...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The African Field Epidemiology Network
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184021 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.4.2475 |
_version_ | 1782332817137467392 |
---|---|
author | Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou Malano, Emmanuel Roland Diallo, Ibrahima Telly Sirimah, Camara |
author_facet | Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou Malano, Emmanuel Roland Diallo, Ibrahima Telly Sirimah, Camara |
author_sort | Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: To estimate the post-campaign level of measles vaccination coverage in Guinea. METHODS: Interview of parents and observation of measles vaccination cards of children aged 9 to 59 months during the mass measles campaign. A nationwide cluster randomized sample under health District stratification. RESULTS: 64.2% (95%CI = 60.9% to 67.4%) of children were vaccinated and had their measles vaccination card. With respect to card and history 90.5% (95%CI = 88.3% to 92.3%) were vaccinated. The estimation was found to be between 72.7% and 81.9%. Coverage with card increased from 55.5% to 79.30% with the level of education of parents but that was not statistically significant, (X(2)(trend) =3.087 P= 0.07). However coverage with card significantly increased with profession from 55.1% for farmers followed by 59.2% for other manual workers to 73.8% for sellers, ending by 74.5% for settled technicians (X(2) (trend) =12.16 P= 0.0005). For unvaccinated children, lack of information accounted for the main reason (37.03%) followed by parents’ occupation (23.45%), parents’ sickness (8.6%), children's sickness (4.9%) and others including vaccinators absent in the post or parents’ belief that it was a door to door campaign. CONCLUSION: The mass measles vaccination campaign achieved an approximate coverage of 75%. Although not enough for effective control of measles, it has covered an important gap left over by the routine immunization coverage 42%. Appropriate measures are needed to improve coverage in routine immunization and specific actions should be taken to target farmers and other manual workers’ families but also uneducated groups for both routine immunization and mass campaigns. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4149790 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The African Field Epidemiology Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41497902014-09-02 An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou Malano, Emmanuel Roland Diallo, Ibrahima Telly Sirimah, Camara Pan Afr Med J Research INTRODUCTION: To estimate the post-campaign level of measles vaccination coverage in Guinea. METHODS: Interview of parents and observation of measles vaccination cards of children aged 9 to 59 months during the mass measles campaign. A nationwide cluster randomized sample under health District stratification. RESULTS: 64.2% (95%CI = 60.9% to 67.4%) of children were vaccinated and had their measles vaccination card. With respect to card and history 90.5% (95%CI = 88.3% to 92.3%) were vaccinated. The estimation was found to be between 72.7% and 81.9%. Coverage with card increased from 55.5% to 79.30% with the level of education of parents but that was not statistically significant, (X(2)(trend) =3.087 P= 0.07). However coverage with card significantly increased with profession from 55.1% for farmers followed by 59.2% for other manual workers to 73.8% for sellers, ending by 74.5% for settled technicians (X(2) (trend) =12.16 P= 0.0005). For unvaccinated children, lack of information accounted for the main reason (37.03%) followed by parents’ occupation (23.45%), parents’ sickness (8.6%), children's sickness (4.9%) and others including vaccinators absent in the post or parents’ belief that it was a door to door campaign. CONCLUSION: The mass measles vaccination campaign achieved an approximate coverage of 75%. Although not enough for effective control of measles, it has covered an important gap left over by the routine immunization coverage 42%. Appropriate measures are needed to improve coverage in routine immunization and specific actions should be taken to target farmers and other manual workers’ families but also uneducated groups for both routine immunization and mass campaigns. The African Field Epidemiology Network 2014-01-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4149790/ /pubmed/25184021 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.4.2475 Text en © Jean Gerard Tatou Doumtsop et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ The Pan African Medical Journal - ISSN 1937-8688. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Doumtsop, Jean Gerard Tatou Malano, Emmanuel Roland Diallo, Ibrahima Telly Sirimah, Camara An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea |
title | An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea |
title_full | An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea |
title_fullStr | An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea |
title_full_unstemmed | An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea |
title_short | An evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in Guinea |
title_sort | evaluation of the 2012 measles mass vaccination campaign in guinea |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149790/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184021 http://dx.doi.org/10.11604/pamj.2014.17.4.2475 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT doumtsopjeangerardtatou anevaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea AT malanoemmanuelroland anevaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea AT dialloibrahimatelly anevaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea AT sirimahcamara anevaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea AT doumtsopjeangerardtatou evaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea AT malanoemmanuelroland evaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea AT dialloibrahimatelly evaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea AT sirimahcamara evaluationofthe2012measlesmassvaccinationcampaigninguinea |