Cargando…

Latencies longer than 3.5 ms after vagus nerve stimulation does not exclude a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve

BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that a signal latency shorter than 3.5 ms after electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve signify a nonrecurrent course of the inferior laryngeal nerve. We present a patient with an ascending nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve. In this patient, the stimul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brauckhoff, Michael, Naterstad, Helle, Brauckhoff, Katrin, Biermann, Martin, Aas, Turid
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25168966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-61
_version_ 1782332821662072832
author Brauckhoff, Michael
Naterstad, Helle
Brauckhoff, Katrin
Biermann, Martin
Aas, Turid
author_facet Brauckhoff, Michael
Naterstad, Helle
Brauckhoff, Katrin
Biermann, Martin
Aas, Turid
author_sort Brauckhoff, Michael
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that a signal latency shorter than 3.5 ms after electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve signify a nonrecurrent course of the inferior laryngeal nerve. We present a patient with an ascending nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve. In this patient, the stimulation latency was longer than 3.5 ms. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-years old female underwent redo surgery due to a right-sided recurrent nodular goitre. The signal latency on electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve at the level of the carotid artery bifurcation was 3.75 ms. Further dissection revealed a nonrecurrent but ascending course of the inferior laryngeal nerve. Caused by the recurrent goitre, the nerve was elongated to about 10 cm resulting in this long latency. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that the formerly proposed “3.5 ms rule” for identifying a nonrecurrent course of the inferior laryngeal nerve has exceptions. A longer latency does not necessarily exclude a nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41498722014-09-01 Latencies longer than 3.5 ms after vagus nerve stimulation does not exclude a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve Brauckhoff, Michael Naterstad, Helle Brauckhoff, Katrin Biermann, Martin Aas, Turid BMC Surg Case Report BACKGROUND: It has recently been reported that a signal latency shorter than 3.5 ms after electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve signify a nonrecurrent course of the inferior laryngeal nerve. We present a patient with an ascending nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve. In this patient, the stimulation latency was longer than 3.5 ms. CASE PRESENTATION: A 74-years old female underwent redo surgery due to a right-sided recurrent nodular goitre. The signal latency on electrical stimulation of the vagus nerve at the level of the carotid artery bifurcation was 3.75 ms. Further dissection revealed a nonrecurrent but ascending course of the inferior laryngeal nerve. Caused by the recurrent goitre, the nerve was elongated to about 10 cm resulting in this long latency. CONCLUSION: This case demonstrates that the formerly proposed “3.5 ms rule” for identifying a nonrecurrent course of the inferior laryngeal nerve has exceptions. A longer latency does not necessarily exclude a nonrecurrent laryngeal nerve. BioMed Central 2014-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC4149872/ /pubmed/25168966 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-61 Text en Copyright © 2014 Brauckhoff et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Case Report
Brauckhoff, Michael
Naterstad, Helle
Brauckhoff, Katrin
Biermann, Martin
Aas, Turid
Latencies longer than 3.5 ms after vagus nerve stimulation does not exclude a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve
title Latencies longer than 3.5 ms after vagus nerve stimulation does not exclude a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve
title_full Latencies longer than 3.5 ms after vagus nerve stimulation does not exclude a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve
title_fullStr Latencies longer than 3.5 ms after vagus nerve stimulation does not exclude a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve
title_full_unstemmed Latencies longer than 3.5 ms after vagus nerve stimulation does not exclude a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve
title_short Latencies longer than 3.5 ms after vagus nerve stimulation does not exclude a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve
title_sort latencies longer than 3.5 ms after vagus nerve stimulation does not exclude a nonrecurrent inferior laryngeal nerve
topic Case Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25168966
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2482-14-61
work_keys_str_mv AT brauckhoffmichael latencieslongerthan35msaftervagusnervestimulationdoesnotexcludeanonrecurrentinferiorlaryngealnerve
AT naterstadhelle latencieslongerthan35msaftervagusnervestimulationdoesnotexcludeanonrecurrentinferiorlaryngealnerve
AT brauckhoffkatrin latencieslongerthan35msaftervagusnervestimulationdoesnotexcludeanonrecurrentinferiorlaryngealnerve
AT biermannmartin latencieslongerthan35msaftervagusnervestimulationdoesnotexcludeanonrecurrentinferiorlaryngealnerve
AT aasturid latencieslongerthan35msaftervagusnervestimulationdoesnotexcludeanonrecurrentinferiorlaryngealnerve