Cargando…

Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PURPOSE: To assess the clinical outcome after early versus late decompression for traumatic cervical cord injury. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Traumatic spinal cord injury is common globally with the most tragic outcomes in the cervical spine. Although recen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Umerani, Muhammad Sohail, Abbas, Asad, Sharif, Salman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187859
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.427
_version_ 1782332828964356096
author Umerani, Muhammad Sohail
Abbas, Asad
Sharif, Salman
author_facet Umerani, Muhammad Sohail
Abbas, Asad
Sharif, Salman
author_sort Umerani, Muhammad Sohail
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PURPOSE: To assess the clinical outcome after early versus late decompression for traumatic cervical cord injury. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Traumatic spinal cord injury is common globally with the most tragic outcomes in the cervical spine. Although recent studies have shown that early decompression results in more favourable outcome, its authority is yet to be established. METHODS: Study on 98 patients with a traumatic cervical cord injury was conducted over a period of 5 years. The patients who were operated on within 24 hours of the onset of the primary injury (n=34) were classified as the early group, and those who were operated on after 24 hours of the onset of the injury (n=64) were categorized as the late group. The outcome of both the groups was assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) at the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: The patients in the early group were operated on at a mean time of 18.4 hours (range, 13-24 hours) while patients were operated on at a mean time of 52.7 hours (range, 31-124 hours) in the late group. At the 6-month follow-up, 7 (23.3%) in the early group and 5 (8.7%) in the late group showed >2 grade improvement in the AIS. CONCLUSIONS: The results of patients undergoing decompression within 24 hours of the injury are better than those who are operated on later. An attempt should be made to decompress the traumatic cervical spine early in all possible cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149985
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41499852014-09-03 Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma Umerani, Muhammad Sohail Abbas, Asad Sharif, Salman Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. PURPOSE: To assess the clinical outcome after early versus late decompression for traumatic cervical cord injury. OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Traumatic spinal cord injury is common globally with the most tragic outcomes in the cervical spine. Although recent studies have shown that early decompression results in more favourable outcome, its authority is yet to be established. METHODS: Study on 98 patients with a traumatic cervical cord injury was conducted over a period of 5 years. The patients who were operated on within 24 hours of the onset of the primary injury (n=34) were classified as the early group, and those who were operated on after 24 hours of the onset of the injury (n=64) were categorized as the late group. The outcome of both the groups was assessed using the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale (AIS) at the 6-month follow-up. RESULTS: The patients in the early group were operated on at a mean time of 18.4 hours (range, 13-24 hours) while patients were operated on at a mean time of 52.7 hours (range, 31-124 hours) in the late group. At the 6-month follow-up, 7 (23.3%) in the early group and 5 (8.7%) in the late group showed >2 grade improvement in the AIS. CONCLUSIONS: The results of patients undergoing decompression within 24 hours of the injury are better than those who are operated on later. An attempt should be made to decompress the traumatic cervical spine early in all possible cases. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2014-08 2014-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4149985/ /pubmed/25187859 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.427 Text en Copyright © 2014 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Umerani, Muhammad Sohail
Abbas, Asad
Sharif, Salman
Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma
title Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma
title_full Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma
title_fullStr Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma
title_short Clinical Outcome in Patients with Early versus Delayed Decompression in Cervical Spine Trauma
title_sort clinical outcome in patients with early versus delayed decompression in cervical spine trauma
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149985/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187859
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.427
work_keys_str_mv AT umeranimuhammadsohail clinicaloutcomeinpatientswithearlyversusdelayeddecompressionincervicalspinetrauma
AT abbasasad clinicaloutcomeinpatientswithearlyversusdelayeddecompressionincervicalspinetrauma
AT sharifsalman clinicaloutcomeinpatientswithearlyversusdelayeddecompressionincervicalspinetrauma