Cargando…

Mini-Open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. PURPOSES: To introduce the mini-open lateral approach for the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and to investigate the advantages, technical pitfalls and complications by providing basic knowledge on extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) or direct lumba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Chong-Suh, Chung, Sung-Soo, Pae, Young-Ryeol, Park, Se-Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187867
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.491
_version_ 1782332830778392576
author Lee, Chong-Suh
Chung, Sung-Soo
Pae, Young-Ryeol
Park, Se-Jun
author_facet Lee, Chong-Suh
Chung, Sung-Soo
Pae, Young-Ryeol
Park, Se-Jun
author_sort Lee, Chong-Suh
collection PubMed
description STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. PURPOSES: To introduce the mini-open lateral approach for the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and to investigate the advantages, technical pitfalls and complications by providing basic knowledge on extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) or direct lumbar interbody fusion (DLIF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Recently, minimally invasive lateral approach for the lumbar spine is revived and receiving popularity under the name of XLIF or DLIF by modification of mini-open method when using the sequential tubular dilator and special expandable retractor system. METHODS: Seventy-four patients who underwent surgery by the mini-open lateral approach from September 2000 to April 2008 with various disease entities were included. Blood losses, operation times, incision sizes, postoperative time to mobilization, length of hospital stays, technical problems and complications were all analyzed. RESULTS: The blood losses and operation times of patients who underwent simple ALIF were 61.2 mL and 86 minutes for one level, 107 mL and 106 minutes for two levels, 250 mL and 142.8 minutes for three levels, and 400 mL and 190 minutes for four levels of fusion. The incision sizes were on average 4.5 cm for one level, 6.3 cm for two levels, 8.5 cm for three levels and 10.0 cm for four levels of fusion. The complications were retroperitoneal hematoma (2 cases), pneumonia (1 case) and transient lumbosacral plexus palsy (3 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Trials of mini-open lateral approach would be helpful before the trial of XLIF or DLIF. However, special attention is required for complications such as transient lumbosacral plexus palsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4149993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Korean Society of Spine Surgery
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41499932014-09-03 Mini-Open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Lee, Chong-Suh Chung, Sung-Soo Pae, Young-Ryeol Park, Se-Jun Asian Spine J Clinical Study STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective analysis. PURPOSES: To introduce the mini-open lateral approach for the anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), and to investigate the advantages, technical pitfalls and complications by providing basic knowledge on extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) or direct lumbar interbody fusion (DLIF). OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE: Recently, minimally invasive lateral approach for the lumbar spine is revived and receiving popularity under the name of XLIF or DLIF by modification of mini-open method when using the sequential tubular dilator and special expandable retractor system. METHODS: Seventy-four patients who underwent surgery by the mini-open lateral approach from September 2000 to April 2008 with various disease entities were included. Blood losses, operation times, incision sizes, postoperative time to mobilization, length of hospital stays, technical problems and complications were all analyzed. RESULTS: The blood losses and operation times of patients who underwent simple ALIF were 61.2 mL and 86 minutes for one level, 107 mL and 106 minutes for two levels, 250 mL and 142.8 minutes for three levels, and 400 mL and 190 minutes for four levels of fusion. The incision sizes were on average 4.5 cm for one level, 6.3 cm for two levels, 8.5 cm for three levels and 10.0 cm for four levels of fusion. The complications were retroperitoneal hematoma (2 cases), pneumonia (1 case) and transient lumbosacral plexus palsy (3 cases). CONCLUSIONS: Trials of mini-open lateral approach would be helpful before the trial of XLIF or DLIF. However, special attention is required for complications such as transient lumbosacral plexus palsy. Korean Society of Spine Surgery 2014-08 2014-08-19 /pmc/articles/PMC4149993/ /pubmed/25187867 http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.491 Text en Copyright © 2014 by Korean Society of Spine Surgery http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Lee, Chong-Suh
Chung, Sung-Soo
Pae, Young-Ryeol
Park, Se-Jun
Mini-Open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title Mini-Open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full Mini-Open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_fullStr Mini-Open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_full_unstemmed Mini-Open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_short Mini-Open Approach for Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion
title_sort mini-open approach for direct lateral lumbar interbody fusion
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4149993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187867
http://dx.doi.org/10.4184/asj.2014.8.4.491
work_keys_str_mv AT leechongsuh miniopenapproachfordirectlaterallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT chungsungsoo miniopenapproachfordirectlaterallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT paeyoungryeol miniopenapproachfordirectlaterallumbarinterbodyfusion
AT parksejun miniopenapproachfordirectlaterallumbarinterbodyfusion