Cargando…
Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service
BACKGROUND: The few studies on repeat aspiration focussed on accuracy of diagnosis following repeat. Numbers and documented reasons for repeat remain unaddressed. AIM: To study factors associated with requests for repeat fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Metropolitan hospi...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190975 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.130612 |
_version_ | 1782332879112503296 |
---|---|
author | Goyal, Rachna Garg, Pankaj Kumar Bhatia, Arati Arora, Vinod Kumar Singh, Navjeevan |
author_facet | Goyal, Rachna Garg, Pankaj Kumar Bhatia, Arati Arora, Vinod Kumar Singh, Navjeevan |
author_sort | Goyal, Rachna |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The few studies on repeat aspiration focussed on accuracy of diagnosis following repeat. Numbers and documented reasons for repeat remain unaddressed. AIM: To study factors associated with requests for repeat fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Metropolitan hospital, clinical audit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Audit of 5104 FNAC in 10 months. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Univariate, and multivariate binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Seven hundred and six patients (13.8%) were advised repeat aspirates. Three hundred and twelve of these were actually repeated (44.1%). Carryover of actually repeated aspirates to subsequent months averaged 10.8 (34.2%). Maximum numbers of repeat requests were from thyroid 76/415 (18.3%), followed by lymph node 310/1856 (16.7%), and from breast 86/716 (12.0%). Outcome of actually repeated aspirates were: Diagnostic 181/312 (58.0%), and non-diagnostic 131/312 (41.9%). Reasons for repeat were inadequate aspirates 370/706 (52.4%), non-diagnostic descriptive reports 309/706 (43.7%); in 27/706 (3.8%), no reason was mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate aspirates, non-diagnostic descriptive reports, and FNAC/FNAB from thyroid, lymph nodes, and breast contribute to repeats. We suggest steps to reduce the number of repeat aspirates to eliminate extra work. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4150334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41503342014-09-04 Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service Goyal, Rachna Garg, Pankaj Kumar Bhatia, Arati Arora, Vinod Kumar Singh, Navjeevan J Cytol Original Article BACKGROUND: The few studies on repeat aspiration focussed on accuracy of diagnosis following repeat. Numbers and documented reasons for repeat remain unaddressed. AIM: To study factors associated with requests for repeat fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Metropolitan hospital, clinical audit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Audit of 5104 FNAC in 10 months. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Univariate, and multivariate binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Seven hundred and six patients (13.8%) were advised repeat aspirates. Three hundred and twelve of these were actually repeated (44.1%). Carryover of actually repeated aspirates to subsequent months averaged 10.8 (34.2%). Maximum numbers of repeat requests were from thyroid 76/415 (18.3%), followed by lymph node 310/1856 (16.7%), and from breast 86/716 (12.0%). Outcome of actually repeated aspirates were: Diagnostic 181/312 (58.0%), and non-diagnostic 131/312 (41.9%). Reasons for repeat were inadequate aspirates 370/706 (52.4%), non-diagnostic descriptive reports 309/706 (43.7%); in 27/706 (3.8%), no reason was mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate aspirates, non-diagnostic descriptive reports, and FNAC/FNAB from thyroid, lymph nodes, and breast contribute to repeats. We suggest steps to reduce the number of repeat aspirates to eliminate extra work. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4150334/ /pubmed/25190975 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.130612 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Cytology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Goyal, Rachna Garg, Pankaj Kumar Bhatia, Arati Arora, Vinod Kumar Singh, Navjeevan Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service |
title | Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service |
title_full | Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service |
title_fullStr | Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service |
title_short | Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service |
title_sort | clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190975 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.130612 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT goyalrachna clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice AT gargpankajkumar clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice AT bhatiaarati clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice AT aroravinodkumar clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice AT singhnavjeevan clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice |