Cargando…

Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service

BACKGROUND: The few studies on repeat aspiration focussed on accuracy of diagnosis following repeat. Numbers and documented reasons for repeat remain unaddressed. AIM: To study factors associated with requests for repeat fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Metropolitan hospi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Goyal, Rachna, Garg, Pankaj Kumar, Bhatia, Arati, Arora, Vinod Kumar, Singh, Navjeevan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190975
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.130612
_version_ 1782332879112503296
author Goyal, Rachna
Garg, Pankaj Kumar
Bhatia, Arati
Arora, Vinod Kumar
Singh, Navjeevan
author_facet Goyal, Rachna
Garg, Pankaj Kumar
Bhatia, Arati
Arora, Vinod Kumar
Singh, Navjeevan
author_sort Goyal, Rachna
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The few studies on repeat aspiration focussed on accuracy of diagnosis following repeat. Numbers and documented reasons for repeat remain unaddressed. AIM: To study factors associated with requests for repeat fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Metropolitan hospital, clinical audit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Audit of 5104 FNAC in 10 months. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Univariate, and multivariate binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Seven hundred and six patients (13.8%) were advised repeat aspirates. Three hundred and twelve of these were actually repeated (44.1%). Carryover of actually repeated aspirates to subsequent months averaged 10.8 (34.2%). Maximum numbers of repeat requests were from thyroid 76/415 (18.3%), followed by lymph node 310/1856 (16.7%), and from breast 86/716 (12.0%). Outcome of actually repeated aspirates were: Diagnostic 181/312 (58.0%), and non-diagnostic 131/312 (41.9%). Reasons for repeat were inadequate aspirates 370/706 (52.4%), non-diagnostic descriptive reports 309/706 (43.7%); in 27/706 (3.8%), no reason was mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate aspirates, non-diagnostic descriptive reports, and FNAC/FNAB from thyroid, lymph nodes, and breast contribute to repeats. We suggest steps to reduce the number of repeat aspirates to eliminate extra work.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4150334
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41503342014-09-04 Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service Goyal, Rachna Garg, Pankaj Kumar Bhatia, Arati Arora, Vinod Kumar Singh, Navjeevan J Cytol Original Article BACKGROUND: The few studies on repeat aspiration focussed on accuracy of diagnosis following repeat. Numbers and documented reasons for repeat remain unaddressed. AIM: To study factors associated with requests for repeat fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC). SETTINGS AND DESIGN: Metropolitan hospital, clinical audit. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Audit of 5104 FNAC in 10 months. STATISTICAL ANALYSIS USED: Univariate, and multivariate binary logistic regression. RESULTS: Seven hundred and six patients (13.8%) were advised repeat aspirates. Three hundred and twelve of these were actually repeated (44.1%). Carryover of actually repeated aspirates to subsequent months averaged 10.8 (34.2%). Maximum numbers of repeat requests were from thyroid 76/415 (18.3%), followed by lymph node 310/1856 (16.7%), and from breast 86/716 (12.0%). Outcome of actually repeated aspirates were: Diagnostic 181/312 (58.0%), and non-diagnostic 131/312 (41.9%). Reasons for repeat were inadequate aspirates 370/706 (52.4%), non-diagnostic descriptive reports 309/706 (43.7%); in 27/706 (3.8%), no reason was mentioned. CONCLUSIONS: Inadequate aspirates, non-diagnostic descriptive reports, and FNAC/FNAB from thyroid, lymph nodes, and breast contribute to repeats. We suggest steps to reduce the number of repeat aspirates to eliminate extra work. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4150334/ /pubmed/25190975 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.130612 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Cytology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Goyal, Rachna
Garg, Pankaj Kumar
Bhatia, Arati
Arora, Vinod Kumar
Singh, Navjeevan
Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service
title Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service
title_full Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service
title_fullStr Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service
title_full_unstemmed Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service
title_short Clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service
title_sort clinical audit of repeat fine needle aspiration in a general cytopathology service
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150334/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25190975
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0970-9371.130612
work_keys_str_mv AT goyalrachna clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice
AT gargpankajkumar clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice
AT bhatiaarati clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice
AT aroravinodkumar clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice
AT singhnavjeevan clinicalauditofrepeatfineneedleaspirationinageneralcytopathologyservice