Cargando…

Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation

BACKGROUND: In an attempt to address a complex disease burden, including improving progress towards MDGs 4 and 5, South Africa recently introduced a re-engineered Primary Health Care (PHC) strategy, which has led to the development of a national community health worker (CHW) programme. The present s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neupane, Sunisha, Odendaal, Willem, Friedman, Irwin, Jassat, Waasila, Schneider, Helen, Doherty, Tanya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25106499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-69
_version_ 1782332920903499776
author Neupane, Sunisha
Odendaal, Willem
Friedman, Irwin
Jassat, Waasila
Schneider, Helen
Doherty, Tanya
author_facet Neupane, Sunisha
Odendaal, Willem
Friedman, Irwin
Jassat, Waasila
Schneider, Helen
Doherty, Tanya
author_sort Neupane, Sunisha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In an attempt to address a complex disease burden, including improving progress towards MDGs 4 and 5, South Africa recently introduced a re-engineered Primary Health Care (PHC) strategy, which has led to the development of a national community health worker (CHW) programme. The present study explored the development of a cell phone-based and paper-based monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system to support the work of the CHWs. METHODS: One sub-district in the North West province was identified for the evaluation. One outreach team comprising ten CHWs maintained both the paper forms and mHealth system to record household data on community-based services. A comparative analysis was done to calculate the correspondence between the paper and phone records. A focus group discussion was conducted with the CHWs. Clinical referrals, data accuracy and supervised visits were compared and analysed for the paper and phone systems. RESULTS: Compared to the mHealth system where data accuracy was assured, 40% of the CHWs showed a consistently high level (>90% correspondence) of data transfer accuracy on paper. Overall, there was an improvement over time, and by the fifth month, all CHWs achieved a correspondence of 90% or above between phone and paper data. The most common error that occurred was summing the total number of visits and/or activities across the five household activity indicators. Few supervised home visits were recorded in either system and there was no evidence of the team leader following up on the automatic notifications received on their cell phones. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation emphasizes the need for regular supervision for both systems and rigorous and ongoing assessments of data quality for the paper system. Formalization of a mHealth M&E system for PHC outreach teams delivering community based services could offer greater accuracy of M&E and enhance supervision systems for CHWs.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4150556
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41505562014-09-02 Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation Neupane, Sunisha Odendaal, Willem Friedman, Irwin Jassat, Waasila Schneider, Helen Doherty, Tanya BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: In an attempt to address a complex disease burden, including improving progress towards MDGs 4 and 5, South Africa recently introduced a re-engineered Primary Health Care (PHC) strategy, which has led to the development of a national community health worker (CHW) programme. The present study explored the development of a cell phone-based and paper-based monitoring and evaluation (M&E) system to support the work of the CHWs. METHODS: One sub-district in the North West province was identified for the evaluation. One outreach team comprising ten CHWs maintained both the paper forms and mHealth system to record household data on community-based services. A comparative analysis was done to calculate the correspondence between the paper and phone records. A focus group discussion was conducted with the CHWs. Clinical referrals, data accuracy and supervised visits were compared and analysed for the paper and phone systems. RESULTS: Compared to the mHealth system where data accuracy was assured, 40% of the CHWs showed a consistently high level (>90% correspondence) of data transfer accuracy on paper. Overall, there was an improvement over time, and by the fifth month, all CHWs achieved a correspondence of 90% or above between phone and paper data. The most common error that occurred was summing the total number of visits and/or activities across the five household activity indicators. Few supervised home visits were recorded in either system and there was no evidence of the team leader following up on the automatic notifications received on their cell phones. CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation emphasizes the need for regular supervision for both systems and rigorous and ongoing assessments of data quality for the paper system. Formalization of a mHealth M&E system for PHC outreach teams delivering community based services could offer greater accuracy of M&E and enhance supervision systems for CHWs. BioMed Central 2014-08-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4150556/ /pubmed/25106499 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-69 Text en Copyright © 2014 Neupane et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Neupane, Sunisha
Odendaal, Willem
Friedman, Irwin
Jassat, Waasila
Schneider, Helen
Doherty, Tanya
Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation
title Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation
title_full Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation
title_fullStr Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation
title_full_unstemmed Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation
title_short Comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mHealth system to support the national community health worker programme, South Africa: an evaluation
title_sort comparing a paper based monitoring and evaluation system to a mhealth system to support the national community health worker programme, south africa: an evaluation
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150556/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25106499
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-14-69
work_keys_str_mv AT neupanesunisha comparingapaperbasedmonitoringandevaluationsystemtoamhealthsystemtosupportthenationalcommunityhealthworkerprogrammesouthafricaanevaluation
AT odendaalwillem comparingapaperbasedmonitoringandevaluationsystemtoamhealthsystemtosupportthenationalcommunityhealthworkerprogrammesouthafricaanevaluation
AT friedmanirwin comparingapaperbasedmonitoringandevaluationsystemtoamhealthsystemtosupportthenationalcommunityhealthworkerprogrammesouthafricaanevaluation
AT jassatwaasila comparingapaperbasedmonitoringandevaluationsystemtoamhealthsystemtosupportthenationalcommunityhealthworkerprogrammesouthafricaanevaluation
AT schneiderhelen comparingapaperbasedmonitoringandevaluationsystemtoamhealthsystemtosupportthenationalcommunityhealthworkerprogrammesouthafricaanevaluation
AT dohertytanya comparingapaperbasedmonitoringandevaluationsystemtoamhealthsystemtosupportthenationalcommunityhealthworkerprogrammesouthafricaanevaluation