Cargando…

Controversies related to living kidney donors

BACKGROUND: Increasing the living-donor pool by accepting donors with an isolated medical abnormality (IMA) can significantly decrease the huge gap between limited supply and rising demand for organs. There is a wide range of variation among different centres in dealing with these categories of dono...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kamal, Ahmed I., Harraz, Ahmed M., Shokeir, Ahmed A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.11.001
_version_ 1782332927421448192
author Kamal, Ahmed I.
Harraz, Ahmed M.
Shokeir, Ahmed A.
author_facet Kamal, Ahmed I.
Harraz, Ahmed M.
Shokeir, Ahmed A.
author_sort Kamal, Ahmed I.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing the living-donor pool by accepting donors with an isolated medical abnormality (IMA) can significantly decrease the huge gap between limited supply and rising demand for organs. There is a wide range of variation among different centres in dealing with these categories of donors. We reviewed studies discussing living kidney donors with IMA, including greater age, obesity, hypertension, microscopic haematuria and nephrolithiasis, to highlight the effect of these abnormalities on both donor and recipient sides from medical and surgical perspectives. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, ISI Science Citation Index expanded, and Google scholar, from the inception of each source to January 2011, using the terms ‘kidney transplant’, ‘renal’, ‘graft’, ‘living donor’, ‘old’, ‘obesity’, ‘nephrolithiasis’, ‘haematuria’ and ‘hypertension’. In all, 58 studies were found to be relevant and were reviewed comprehensively. RESULTS: Most of the reviewed studies confirmed the safety of using elderly, moderately obese and well-controlled hypertensive donors. Also, under specific circumstances, donors with nephrolithiasis can be accepted. However, persistent microscopic haematuria should be considered seriously and renal biopsy is indicated to exclude underlying renal disease. CONCLUSION: Extensive examination and cautious selection with tailored immunosuppressive protocols for these groups can provide a satisfactory short- and medium-term outcome. Highly motivated elderly, obese, controlled hypertensive and the donor with a unilateral small stone (<1.5 cm, with normal metabolic evaluation) could be accepted. Donors with dysmorphic and persistent haematuria should not be accepted. A close follow-up after donation is crucial, especially for obese donors who developed microalbuminuria.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4150584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41505842015-11-17 Controversies related to living kidney donors Kamal, Ahmed I. Harraz, Ahmed M. Shokeir, Ahmed A. Arab J Urol Renal Transplantation Review BACKGROUND: Increasing the living-donor pool by accepting donors with an isolated medical abnormality (IMA) can significantly decrease the huge gap between limited supply and rising demand for organs. There is a wide range of variation among different centres in dealing with these categories of donors. We reviewed studies discussing living kidney donors with IMA, including greater age, obesity, hypertension, microscopic haematuria and nephrolithiasis, to highlight the effect of these abnormalities on both donor and recipient sides from medical and surgical perspectives. METHODS: We systematically searched MEDLINE, ISI Science Citation Index expanded, and Google scholar, from the inception of each source to January 2011, using the terms ‘kidney transplant’, ‘renal’, ‘graft’, ‘living donor’, ‘old’, ‘obesity’, ‘nephrolithiasis’, ‘haematuria’ and ‘hypertension’. In all, 58 studies were found to be relevant and were reviewed comprehensively. RESULTS: Most of the reviewed studies confirmed the safety of using elderly, moderately obese and well-controlled hypertensive donors. Also, under specific circumstances, donors with nephrolithiasis can be accepted. However, persistent microscopic haematuria should be considered seriously and renal biopsy is indicated to exclude underlying renal disease. CONCLUSION: Extensive examination and cautious selection with tailored immunosuppressive protocols for these groups can provide a satisfactory short- and medium-term outcome. Highly motivated elderly, obese, controlled hypertensive and the donor with a unilateral small stone (<1.5 cm, with normal metabolic evaluation) could be accepted. Donors with dysmorphic and persistent haematuria should not be accepted. A close follow-up after donation is crucial, especially for obese donors who developed microalbuminuria. Elsevier 2011-12 2011-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4150584/ /pubmed/26579303 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.11.001 Text en © 2011 Arab Association of Urology. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/).
spellingShingle Renal Transplantation Review
Kamal, Ahmed I.
Harraz, Ahmed M.
Shokeir, Ahmed A.
Controversies related to living kidney donors
title Controversies related to living kidney donors
title_full Controversies related to living kidney donors
title_fullStr Controversies related to living kidney donors
title_full_unstemmed Controversies related to living kidney donors
title_short Controversies related to living kidney donors
title_sort controversies related to living kidney donors
topic Renal Transplantation Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26579303
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aju.2011.11.001
work_keys_str_mv AT kamalahmedi controversiesrelatedtolivingkidneydonors
AT harrazahmedm controversiesrelatedtolivingkidneydonors
AT shokeirahmeda controversiesrelatedtolivingkidneydonors