Cargando…

How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition

“The Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition (STAC)”, proposed in 2009, is a conceptual model of cognitive aging that integrated evidence from structural and functional neuroimaging to explain how the combined effects of adverse and compensatory neural processes produce varying levels of cognitive...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A., Park, Denise C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9
_version_ 1782332980946010112
author Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A.
Park, Denise C.
author_facet Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A.
Park, Denise C.
author_sort Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A.
collection PubMed
description “The Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition (STAC)”, proposed in 2009, is a conceptual model of cognitive aging that integrated evidence from structural and functional neuroimaging to explain how the combined effects of adverse and compensatory neural processes produce varying levels of cognitive function. The model made clear and testable predictions about how different brain variables, both structural and functional, were related to cognitive function, focusing on the core construct of compensatory scaffolding. The present paper provides a revised model that integrates new evidence about the aging brain that has emerged since STAC was published 5 years ago. Unlike the original STAC model, STAC-r incorporates life-course factors that serve to enhance or deplete neural resources, thereby influencing the developmental course of brain structure and function, as well as cognition, over time. Life-course factors also influence compensatory processes that are engaged to meet cognitive challenge, and to ameliorate the adverse effects of structural and functional decline. The revised model is discussed in relation to recent lifespan and longitudinal data as well as emerging evidence about the effects of training interventions. STAC-r goes beyond the previous model by combining a life-span approach with a life-course approach to understand and predict cognitive status and rate of cognitive change over time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4150993
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41509932014-09-02 How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A. Park, Denise C. Neuropsychol Rev Review “The Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition (STAC)”, proposed in 2009, is a conceptual model of cognitive aging that integrated evidence from structural and functional neuroimaging to explain how the combined effects of adverse and compensatory neural processes produce varying levels of cognitive function. The model made clear and testable predictions about how different brain variables, both structural and functional, were related to cognitive function, focusing on the core construct of compensatory scaffolding. The present paper provides a revised model that integrates new evidence about the aging brain that has emerged since STAC was published 5 years ago. Unlike the original STAC model, STAC-r incorporates life-course factors that serve to enhance or deplete neural resources, thereby influencing the developmental course of brain structure and function, as well as cognition, over time. Life-course factors also influence compensatory processes that are engaged to meet cognitive challenge, and to ameliorate the adverse effects of structural and functional decline. The revised model is discussed in relation to recent lifespan and longitudinal data as well as emerging evidence about the effects of training interventions. STAC-r goes beyond the previous model by combining a life-span approach with a life-course approach to understand and predict cognitive status and rate of cognitive change over time. Springer US 2014-08-21 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4150993/ /pubmed/25143069 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2014 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Review
Reuter-Lorenz, Patricia A.
Park, Denise C.
How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition
title How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition
title_full How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition
title_fullStr How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition
title_full_unstemmed How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition
title_short How Does it STAC Up? Revisiting the Scaffolding Theory of Aging and Cognition
title_sort how does it stac up? revisiting the scaffolding theory of aging and cognition
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4150993/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25143069
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11065-014-9270-9
work_keys_str_mv AT reuterlorenzpatriciaa howdoesitstacuprevisitingthescaffoldingtheoryofagingandcognition
AT parkdenisec howdoesitstacuprevisitingthescaffoldingtheoryofagingandcognition