Cargando…

Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens

We evaluated the performance of a new chromogenic medium for detection of Clostridium difficile, chromID C. difficile agar (CDIF; bioMérieux, France), by comparison with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; Becton Dickinson and Company, USA). After heat pre-treatment (80℃, 5 min), 185 diarrheal st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Han, Sang Bong, Chang, Jiyoung, Shin, Sang Hyun, Park, Kang Gyun, Lee, Gun Dong, Park, Yong Gyu, Park, Yeon-Joon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.5.376
_version_ 1782332983882022912
author Han, Sang Bong
Chang, Jiyoung
Shin, Sang Hyun
Park, Kang Gyun
Lee, Gun Dong
Park, Yong Gyu
Park, Yeon-Joon
author_facet Han, Sang Bong
Chang, Jiyoung
Shin, Sang Hyun
Park, Kang Gyun
Lee, Gun Dong
Park, Yong Gyu
Park, Yeon-Joon
author_sort Han, Sang Bong
collection PubMed
description We evaluated the performance of a new chromogenic medium for detection of Clostridium difficile, chromID C. difficile agar (CDIF; bioMérieux, France), by comparison with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; Becton Dickinson and Company, USA). After heat pre-treatment (80℃, 5 min), 185 diarrheal stool samples were inoculated onto the two media types and incubated anaerobically for 24 hr and 48 hr for CDIF and for 48 hr and 72 hr for CDSA. All typical colonies on each medium were examined by Gram staining, and the gram-positive rods confirmed to contain the tpi gene by PCR were identified as C. difficile. C. difficile was recovered from 36 samples by using a combination of the two media. The sensitivity with CDIF 48 hr was highest (100%) and was significantly higher than that with CDIF 24 hr (58.3%; P<0.001), because samples with a low burden of C. difficile tended to require prolonged incubation up to 48 hr (P<0.001). The specificity of CDIF 24 hr and CDIF 48 hr (99.3% and 90.6%, respectively) was significantly higher than that of CDSA 48 hr and CDSA 72 hr (72.5% and 67.1%, respectively; P<0.001). CDIF was effective for detecting C. difficile in heat-pretreated stool specimens, thus reducing unnecessary testing for toxin production in non-C. difficile isolates and turnaround time.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4151007
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41510072014-09-03 Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens Han, Sang Bong Chang, Jiyoung Shin, Sang Hyun Park, Kang Gyun Lee, Gun Dong Park, Yong Gyu Park, Yeon-Joon Ann Lab Med Brief Communication We evaluated the performance of a new chromogenic medium for detection of Clostridium difficile, chromID C. difficile agar (CDIF; bioMérieux, France), by comparison with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; Becton Dickinson and Company, USA). After heat pre-treatment (80℃, 5 min), 185 diarrheal stool samples were inoculated onto the two media types and incubated anaerobically for 24 hr and 48 hr for CDIF and for 48 hr and 72 hr for CDSA. All typical colonies on each medium were examined by Gram staining, and the gram-positive rods confirmed to contain the tpi gene by PCR were identified as C. difficile. C. difficile was recovered from 36 samples by using a combination of the two media. The sensitivity with CDIF 48 hr was highest (100%) and was significantly higher than that with CDIF 24 hr (58.3%; P<0.001), because samples with a low burden of C. difficile tended to require prolonged incubation up to 48 hr (P<0.001). The specificity of CDIF 24 hr and CDIF 48 hr (99.3% and 90.6%, respectively) was significantly higher than that of CDSA 48 hr and CDSA 72 hr (72.5% and 67.1%, respectively; P<0.001). CDIF was effective for detecting C. difficile in heat-pretreated stool specimens, thus reducing unnecessary testing for toxin production in non-C. difficile isolates and turnaround time. The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2014-09 2014-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4151007/ /pubmed/25187891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.5.376 Text en © The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Brief Communication
Han, Sang Bong
Chang, Jiyoung
Shin, Sang Hyun
Park, Kang Gyun
Lee, Gun Dong
Park, Yong Gyu
Park, Yeon-Joon
Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens
title Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens
title_full Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens
title_fullStr Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens
title_full_unstemmed Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens
title_short Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens
title_sort performance of chromid clostridium difficile agar compared with bbl c. difficile selective agar for detection of c. difficile in stool specimens
topic Brief Communication
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151007/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187891
http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.5.376
work_keys_str_mv AT hansangbong performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens
AT changjiyoung performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens
AT shinsanghyun performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens
AT parkkanggyun performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens
AT leegundong performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens
AT parkyonggyu performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens
AT parkyeonjoon performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens