Cargando…
Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens
We evaluated the performance of a new chromogenic medium for detection of Clostridium difficile, chromID C. difficile agar (CDIF; bioMérieux, France), by comparison with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; Becton Dickinson and Company, USA). After heat pre-treatment (80℃, 5 min), 185 diarrheal st...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.5.376 |
_version_ | 1782332983882022912 |
---|---|
author | Han, Sang Bong Chang, Jiyoung Shin, Sang Hyun Park, Kang Gyun Lee, Gun Dong Park, Yong Gyu Park, Yeon-Joon |
author_facet | Han, Sang Bong Chang, Jiyoung Shin, Sang Hyun Park, Kang Gyun Lee, Gun Dong Park, Yong Gyu Park, Yeon-Joon |
author_sort | Han, Sang Bong |
collection | PubMed |
description | We evaluated the performance of a new chromogenic medium for detection of Clostridium difficile, chromID C. difficile agar (CDIF; bioMérieux, France), by comparison with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; Becton Dickinson and Company, USA). After heat pre-treatment (80℃, 5 min), 185 diarrheal stool samples were inoculated onto the two media types and incubated anaerobically for 24 hr and 48 hr for CDIF and for 48 hr and 72 hr for CDSA. All typical colonies on each medium were examined by Gram staining, and the gram-positive rods confirmed to contain the tpi gene by PCR were identified as C. difficile. C. difficile was recovered from 36 samples by using a combination of the two media. The sensitivity with CDIF 48 hr was highest (100%) and was significantly higher than that with CDIF 24 hr (58.3%; P<0.001), because samples with a low burden of C. difficile tended to require prolonged incubation up to 48 hr (P<0.001). The specificity of CDIF 24 hr and CDIF 48 hr (99.3% and 90.6%, respectively) was significantly higher than that of CDSA 48 hr and CDSA 72 hr (72.5% and 67.1%, respectively; P<0.001). CDIF was effective for detecting C. difficile in heat-pretreated stool specimens, thus reducing unnecessary testing for toxin production in non-C. difficile isolates and turnaround time. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4151007 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41510072014-09-03 Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens Han, Sang Bong Chang, Jiyoung Shin, Sang Hyun Park, Kang Gyun Lee, Gun Dong Park, Yong Gyu Park, Yeon-Joon Ann Lab Med Brief Communication We evaluated the performance of a new chromogenic medium for detection of Clostridium difficile, chromID C. difficile agar (CDIF; bioMérieux, France), by comparison with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar (CDSA; Becton Dickinson and Company, USA). After heat pre-treatment (80℃, 5 min), 185 diarrheal stool samples were inoculated onto the two media types and incubated anaerobically for 24 hr and 48 hr for CDIF and for 48 hr and 72 hr for CDSA. All typical colonies on each medium were examined by Gram staining, and the gram-positive rods confirmed to contain the tpi gene by PCR were identified as C. difficile. C. difficile was recovered from 36 samples by using a combination of the two media. The sensitivity with CDIF 48 hr was highest (100%) and was significantly higher than that with CDIF 24 hr (58.3%; P<0.001), because samples with a low burden of C. difficile tended to require prolonged incubation up to 48 hr (P<0.001). The specificity of CDIF 24 hr and CDIF 48 hr (99.3% and 90.6%, respectively) was significantly higher than that of CDSA 48 hr and CDSA 72 hr (72.5% and 67.1%, respectively; P<0.001). CDIF was effective for detecting C. difficile in heat-pretreated stool specimens, thus reducing unnecessary testing for toxin production in non-C. difficile isolates and turnaround time. The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine 2014-09 2014-08-21 /pmc/articles/PMC4151007/ /pubmed/25187891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.5.376 Text en © The Korean Society for Laboratory Medicine. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Communication Han, Sang Bong Chang, Jiyoung Shin, Sang Hyun Park, Kang Gyun Lee, Gun Dong Park, Yong Gyu Park, Yeon-Joon Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens |
title | Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens |
title_full | Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens |
title_fullStr | Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens |
title_full_unstemmed | Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens |
title_short | Performance of chromID Clostridium difficile Agar Compared with BBL C. difficile Selective Agar for Detection of C. difficile in Stool Specimens |
title_sort | performance of chromid clostridium difficile agar compared with bbl c. difficile selective agar for detection of c. difficile in stool specimens |
topic | Brief Communication |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151007/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25187891 http://dx.doi.org/10.3343/alm.2014.34.5.376 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hansangbong performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens AT changjiyoung performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens AT shinsanghyun performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens AT parkkanggyun performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens AT leegundong performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens AT parkyonggyu performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens AT parkyeonjoon performanceofchromidclostridiumdifficileagarcomparedwithbblcdifficileselectiveagarfordetectionofcdifficileinstoolspecimens |