Cargando…

Women’s participation in breast cancer screening in France – an ethical approach

BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a major public health challenge. Organized mammography screening (OS) is considered one way to reduce breast cancer mortality. EU recommendations prone mass deployment of OS, and back in 2004, France introduced a national OS programme for women aged 50–74 years. However,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moutel, Grégoire, Duchange, Nathalie, Darquy, Sylviane, de Montgolfier, Sandrine, Papin-Lefebvre, Frédérique, Jullian, Odile, Viguier, Jérôme, Sancho-Garnier, Hélène
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-64
_version_ 1782332993536262144
author Moutel, Grégoire
Duchange, Nathalie
Darquy, Sylviane
de Montgolfier, Sandrine
Papin-Lefebvre, Frédérique
Jullian, Odile
Viguier, Jérôme
Sancho-Garnier, Hélène
author_facet Moutel, Grégoire
Duchange, Nathalie
Darquy, Sylviane
de Montgolfier, Sandrine
Papin-Lefebvre, Frédérique
Jullian, Odile
Viguier, Jérôme
Sancho-Garnier, Hélène
author_sort Moutel, Grégoire
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a major public health challenge. Organized mammography screening (OS) is considered one way to reduce breast cancer mortality. EU recommendations prone mass deployment of OS, and back in 2004, France introduced a national OS programme for women aged 50–74 years. However, in 2012, participation rate was still just 52.7%, well short of the targeted 70% objective. In an effort to re-address the (in) efficiency of the programme, the French National Cancer Institute has drafted an expert-group review of the ethical issues surrounding breast cancer mammography screening. DISCUSSION: Prompted by emerging debate over the efficiency of the screening scheme and its allied public information provision, we keynote the experts’ report based on analysis of epidemiological data and participation rate from the public health authorities. The low coverage of the OS scheme may be partly explained by the fact that a significant number of women undergo mammography outside OS and thus outside OS criteria. These findings call for further thinking on (i) the ethical principles of beneficence and non-malfeasance underpinning this public health initiative, (ii) the reasons behind women’s and professionals’ behavior, and (iii) the need to analyze how information provision to women and the doctor-patient relationship need to evolve in response to scientific controversy over the risks and benefits of conducting mammographic screening. SUMMARY: This work calls for a reappraisal of the provision of screening programme information. We advocate a move to integrate the points sparking debate over the efficiency of the screening scheme to guarantee full transparency. The perspective is to strengthen the respect for autonomy allowing women to make an informed choice in their decision on whether or not to participate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4151080
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41510802014-09-03 Women’s participation in breast cancer screening in France – an ethical approach Moutel, Grégoire Duchange, Nathalie Darquy, Sylviane de Montgolfier, Sandrine Papin-Lefebvre, Frédérique Jullian, Odile Viguier, Jérôme Sancho-Garnier, Hélène BMC Med Ethics Debate BACKGROUND: Breast cancer is a major public health challenge. Organized mammography screening (OS) is considered one way to reduce breast cancer mortality. EU recommendations prone mass deployment of OS, and back in 2004, France introduced a national OS programme for women aged 50–74 years. However, in 2012, participation rate was still just 52.7%, well short of the targeted 70% objective. In an effort to re-address the (in) efficiency of the programme, the French National Cancer Institute has drafted an expert-group review of the ethical issues surrounding breast cancer mammography screening. DISCUSSION: Prompted by emerging debate over the efficiency of the screening scheme and its allied public information provision, we keynote the experts’ report based on analysis of epidemiological data and participation rate from the public health authorities. The low coverage of the OS scheme may be partly explained by the fact that a significant number of women undergo mammography outside OS and thus outside OS criteria. These findings call for further thinking on (i) the ethical principles of beneficence and non-malfeasance underpinning this public health initiative, (ii) the reasons behind women’s and professionals’ behavior, and (iii) the need to analyze how information provision to women and the doctor-patient relationship need to evolve in response to scientific controversy over the risks and benefits of conducting mammographic screening. SUMMARY: This work calls for a reappraisal of the provision of screening programme information. We advocate a move to integrate the points sparking debate over the efficiency of the screening scheme to guarantee full transparency. The perspective is to strengthen the respect for autonomy allowing women to make an informed choice in their decision on whether or not to participate. BioMed Central 2014-08-16 /pmc/articles/PMC4151080/ /pubmed/25127662 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-64 Text en Copyright © 2014 Moutel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Debate
Moutel, Grégoire
Duchange, Nathalie
Darquy, Sylviane
de Montgolfier, Sandrine
Papin-Lefebvre, Frédérique
Jullian, Odile
Viguier, Jérôme
Sancho-Garnier, Hélène
Women’s participation in breast cancer screening in France – an ethical approach
title Women’s participation in breast cancer screening in France – an ethical approach
title_full Women’s participation in breast cancer screening in France – an ethical approach
title_fullStr Women’s participation in breast cancer screening in France – an ethical approach
title_full_unstemmed Women’s participation in breast cancer screening in France – an ethical approach
title_short Women’s participation in breast cancer screening in France – an ethical approach
title_sort women’s participation in breast cancer screening in france – an ethical approach
topic Debate
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151080/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25127662
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6939-15-64
work_keys_str_mv AT moutelgregoire womensparticipationinbreastcancerscreeninginfranceanethicalapproach
AT duchangenathalie womensparticipationinbreastcancerscreeninginfranceanethicalapproach
AT darquysylviane womensparticipationinbreastcancerscreeninginfranceanethicalapproach
AT demontgolfiersandrine womensparticipationinbreastcancerscreeninginfranceanethicalapproach
AT papinlefebvrefrederique womensparticipationinbreastcancerscreeninginfranceanethicalapproach
AT jullianodile womensparticipationinbreastcancerscreeninginfranceanethicalapproach
AT viguierjerome womensparticipationinbreastcancerscreeninginfranceanethicalapproach
AT sanchogarnierhelene womensparticipationinbreastcancerscreeninginfranceanethicalapproach