Cargando…

Ethics of Clinical Science in a Public Health Emergency: Drug Discovery at the Bedside

Clinical research under the usual regulatory constraints may be difficult or even impossible in a public health emergency. Regulators must seek to strike a good balance in granting as wide therapeutic access to new drugs as possible at the same time as gathering sound evidence of safety and effectiv...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Edwards, Sarah J. L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Taylor & Francis Group 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4151792/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23952822
http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2013.813597
Descripción
Sumario:Clinical research under the usual regulatory constraints may be difficult or even impossible in a public health emergency. Regulators must seek to strike a good balance in granting as wide therapeutic access to new drugs as possible at the same time as gathering sound evidence of safety and effectiveness. To inform current policy, I reexamine the philosophical rationale for restricting new medicines to clinical trials, at any stage and for any population of patients (which resides in the precautionary principle), to show that its objective to protect public health, now or in the future, could soon be defeated in a pandemic. Providing wider therapeutic access and coordinating observations and natural experiments, including service delivery by cluster (wedged cluster trials), may provide such a balance. However, there are important questions of fairness to resolve before any such research can proceed.