Cargando…

Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods

BACKGROUND: The global need for disease detection and control has increased effort to engineer point-of-care (POC) tests that are simple, robust, affordable, and non-instrumented. In many POC tests, sample collection involves swabbing the site (e.g., nose, skin), agitating the swab in a fluid to rel...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panpradist, Nuttada, Toley, Bhushan J., Zhang, Xiaohong, Byrnes, Samantha, Buser, Joshua R., Englund, Janet A., Lutz, Barry R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4152222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25181250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105786
_version_ 1782333106498306048
author Panpradist, Nuttada
Toley, Bhushan J.
Zhang, Xiaohong
Byrnes, Samantha
Buser, Joshua R.
Englund, Janet A.
Lutz, Barry R.
author_facet Panpradist, Nuttada
Toley, Bhushan J.
Zhang, Xiaohong
Byrnes, Samantha
Buser, Joshua R.
Englund, Janet A.
Lutz, Barry R.
author_sort Panpradist, Nuttada
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global need for disease detection and control has increased effort to engineer point-of-care (POC) tests that are simple, robust, affordable, and non-instrumented. In many POC tests, sample collection involves swabbing the site (e.g., nose, skin), agitating the swab in a fluid to release the sample, and transferring the fluid to a device for analysis. Poor performance in sample transfer can reduce sensitivity and reproducibility. METHODS: In this study, we compared bacterial release efficiency of seven swab types using manual-agitation methods typical of POC devices. Transfer efficiency was measured using quantitative PCR (qPCR) for Staphylococcus aureus under conditions representing a range of sampling scenarios: 1) spiking low-volume samples onto the swab, 2) submerging the swab in excess-volume samples, and 3) swabbing dried sample from a surface. RESULTS: Excess-volume samples gave the expected recovery for most swabs (based on tip fluid capacity); a polyurethane swab showed enhanced recovery, suggesting an ability to accumulate organisms during sampling. Dry samples led to recovery of ∼20–30% for all swabs tested, suggesting that swab structure and volume is less important when organisms are applied to the outer swab surface. Low-volume samples led to the widest range of transfer efficiencies between swab types. Rayon swabs (63 µL capacity) performed well for excess-volume samples, but showed poor recovery for low-volume samples. Nylon (100 µL) and polyester swabs (27 µL) showed intermediate recovery for low-volume and excess-volume samples. Polyurethane swabs (16 µL) showed excellent recovery for all sample types. This work demonstrates that swab transfer efficiency can be affected by swab material, structure, and fluid capacity and details of the sample. Results and quantitative analysis methods from this study will assist POC assay developers in selecting appropriate swab types and transfer methods.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4152222
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41522222014-09-05 Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods Panpradist, Nuttada Toley, Bhushan J. Zhang, Xiaohong Byrnes, Samantha Buser, Joshua R. Englund, Janet A. Lutz, Barry R. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The global need for disease detection and control has increased effort to engineer point-of-care (POC) tests that are simple, robust, affordable, and non-instrumented. In many POC tests, sample collection involves swabbing the site (e.g., nose, skin), agitating the swab in a fluid to release the sample, and transferring the fluid to a device for analysis. Poor performance in sample transfer can reduce sensitivity and reproducibility. METHODS: In this study, we compared bacterial release efficiency of seven swab types using manual-agitation methods typical of POC devices. Transfer efficiency was measured using quantitative PCR (qPCR) for Staphylococcus aureus under conditions representing a range of sampling scenarios: 1) spiking low-volume samples onto the swab, 2) submerging the swab in excess-volume samples, and 3) swabbing dried sample from a surface. RESULTS: Excess-volume samples gave the expected recovery for most swabs (based on tip fluid capacity); a polyurethane swab showed enhanced recovery, suggesting an ability to accumulate organisms during sampling. Dry samples led to recovery of ∼20–30% for all swabs tested, suggesting that swab structure and volume is less important when organisms are applied to the outer swab surface. Low-volume samples led to the widest range of transfer efficiencies between swab types. Rayon swabs (63 µL capacity) performed well for excess-volume samples, but showed poor recovery for low-volume samples. Nylon (100 µL) and polyester swabs (27 µL) showed intermediate recovery for low-volume and excess-volume samples. Polyurethane swabs (16 µL) showed excellent recovery for all sample types. This work demonstrates that swab transfer efficiency can be affected by swab material, structure, and fluid capacity and details of the sample. Results and quantitative analysis methods from this study will assist POC assay developers in selecting appropriate swab types and transfer methods. Public Library of Science 2014-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4152222/ /pubmed/25181250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105786 Text en © 2014 Panpradist et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Panpradist, Nuttada
Toley, Bhushan J.
Zhang, Xiaohong
Byrnes, Samantha
Buser, Joshua R.
Englund, Janet A.
Lutz, Barry R.
Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods
title Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods
title_full Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods
title_fullStr Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods
title_full_unstemmed Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods
title_short Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods
title_sort swab sample transfer for point-of-care diagnostics: characterization of swab types and manual agitation methods
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4152222/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25181250
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105786
work_keys_str_mv AT panpradistnuttada swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods
AT toleybhushanj swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods
AT zhangxiaohong swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods
AT byrnessamantha swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods
AT buserjoshuar swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods
AT englundjaneta swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods
AT lutzbarryr swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods