Cargando…
Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods
BACKGROUND: The global need for disease detection and control has increased effort to engineer point-of-care (POC) tests that are simple, robust, affordable, and non-instrumented. In many POC tests, sample collection involves swabbing the site (e.g., nose, skin), agitating the swab in a fluid to rel...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4152222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25181250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105786 |
_version_ | 1782333106498306048 |
---|---|
author | Panpradist, Nuttada Toley, Bhushan J. Zhang, Xiaohong Byrnes, Samantha Buser, Joshua R. Englund, Janet A. Lutz, Barry R. |
author_facet | Panpradist, Nuttada Toley, Bhushan J. Zhang, Xiaohong Byrnes, Samantha Buser, Joshua R. Englund, Janet A. Lutz, Barry R. |
author_sort | Panpradist, Nuttada |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The global need for disease detection and control has increased effort to engineer point-of-care (POC) tests that are simple, robust, affordable, and non-instrumented. In many POC tests, sample collection involves swabbing the site (e.g., nose, skin), agitating the swab in a fluid to release the sample, and transferring the fluid to a device for analysis. Poor performance in sample transfer can reduce sensitivity and reproducibility. METHODS: In this study, we compared bacterial release efficiency of seven swab types using manual-agitation methods typical of POC devices. Transfer efficiency was measured using quantitative PCR (qPCR) for Staphylococcus aureus under conditions representing a range of sampling scenarios: 1) spiking low-volume samples onto the swab, 2) submerging the swab in excess-volume samples, and 3) swabbing dried sample from a surface. RESULTS: Excess-volume samples gave the expected recovery for most swabs (based on tip fluid capacity); a polyurethane swab showed enhanced recovery, suggesting an ability to accumulate organisms during sampling. Dry samples led to recovery of ∼20–30% for all swabs tested, suggesting that swab structure and volume is less important when organisms are applied to the outer swab surface. Low-volume samples led to the widest range of transfer efficiencies between swab types. Rayon swabs (63 µL capacity) performed well for excess-volume samples, but showed poor recovery for low-volume samples. Nylon (100 µL) and polyester swabs (27 µL) showed intermediate recovery for low-volume and excess-volume samples. Polyurethane swabs (16 µL) showed excellent recovery for all sample types. This work demonstrates that swab transfer efficiency can be affected by swab material, structure, and fluid capacity and details of the sample. Results and quantitative analysis methods from this study will assist POC assay developers in selecting appropriate swab types and transfer methods. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4152222 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41522222014-09-05 Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods Panpradist, Nuttada Toley, Bhushan J. Zhang, Xiaohong Byrnes, Samantha Buser, Joshua R. Englund, Janet A. Lutz, Barry R. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The global need for disease detection and control has increased effort to engineer point-of-care (POC) tests that are simple, robust, affordable, and non-instrumented. In many POC tests, sample collection involves swabbing the site (e.g., nose, skin), agitating the swab in a fluid to release the sample, and transferring the fluid to a device for analysis. Poor performance in sample transfer can reduce sensitivity and reproducibility. METHODS: In this study, we compared bacterial release efficiency of seven swab types using manual-agitation methods typical of POC devices. Transfer efficiency was measured using quantitative PCR (qPCR) for Staphylococcus aureus under conditions representing a range of sampling scenarios: 1) spiking low-volume samples onto the swab, 2) submerging the swab in excess-volume samples, and 3) swabbing dried sample from a surface. RESULTS: Excess-volume samples gave the expected recovery for most swabs (based on tip fluid capacity); a polyurethane swab showed enhanced recovery, suggesting an ability to accumulate organisms during sampling. Dry samples led to recovery of ∼20–30% for all swabs tested, suggesting that swab structure and volume is less important when organisms are applied to the outer swab surface. Low-volume samples led to the widest range of transfer efficiencies between swab types. Rayon swabs (63 µL capacity) performed well for excess-volume samples, but showed poor recovery for low-volume samples. Nylon (100 µL) and polyester swabs (27 µL) showed intermediate recovery for low-volume and excess-volume samples. Polyurethane swabs (16 µL) showed excellent recovery for all sample types. This work demonstrates that swab transfer efficiency can be affected by swab material, structure, and fluid capacity and details of the sample. Results and quantitative analysis methods from this study will assist POC assay developers in selecting appropriate swab types and transfer methods. Public Library of Science 2014-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC4152222/ /pubmed/25181250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105786 Text en © 2014 Panpradist et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Panpradist, Nuttada Toley, Bhushan J. Zhang, Xiaohong Byrnes, Samantha Buser, Joshua R. Englund, Janet A. Lutz, Barry R. Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods |
title | Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods |
title_full | Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods |
title_fullStr | Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods |
title_full_unstemmed | Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods |
title_short | Swab Sample Transfer for Point-Of-Care Diagnostics: Characterization of Swab Types and Manual Agitation Methods |
title_sort | swab sample transfer for point-of-care diagnostics: characterization of swab types and manual agitation methods |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4152222/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25181250 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0105786 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT panpradistnuttada swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods AT toleybhushanj swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods AT zhangxiaohong swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods AT byrnessamantha swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods AT buserjoshuar swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods AT englundjaneta swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods AT lutzbarryr swabsampletransferforpointofcarediagnosticscharacterizationofswabtypesandmanualagitationmethods |