Cargando…

Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in General Practice. A cross-sectional study

Objective: In many departments of General Practice (GP) in Germany, young doctors who are trainees also work as researchers. Often these trainees work part time at the university and part time as a trainee in clinical practice. However, little is known about the situation of the actors involved. The...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kötter, Thomas, Carmienke, Solveig, Herrmann, Wolfram J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4152995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25228933
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000923
_version_ 1782333195995316224
author Kötter, Thomas
Carmienke, Solveig
Herrmann, Wolfram J.
author_facet Kötter, Thomas
Carmienke, Solveig
Herrmann, Wolfram J.
author_sort Kötter, Thomas
collection PubMed
description Objective: In many departments of General Practice (GP) in Germany, young doctors who are trainees also work as researchers. Often these trainees work part time at the university and part time as a trainee in clinical practice. However, little is known about the situation of the actors involved. The aim of the study was to investigate the perspectives of GP trainees, heads of departments and GP trainers regarding the combination of research and GP training. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey with the heads of all German departments of General Practice, GP trainees who also conduct research and their GP trainers. The questionnaires consisted of open and closed questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods. Results: 28 heads of GP departments and 20 GP trainees responded. The trainees were mostly very satisfied with their situation as a trainee. However, the trainees considered the combination of research and GP training as difficult. The respondents name as problems the coordination of multiple jobs and the lack of credibility given to research in General Practice. They name as solutions research-enabling training programs and uniform requirements in training regarding research. Conclusion: The combination of GP training and scientific research activity is perceived as difficult. However, well-organized and designed programs can improve the quality of the combination.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4152995
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher German Medical Science GMS Publishing House
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41529952014-09-16 Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in General Practice. A cross-sectional study Kötter, Thomas Carmienke, Solveig Herrmann, Wolfram J. GMS Z Med Ausbild Article Objective: In many departments of General Practice (GP) in Germany, young doctors who are trainees also work as researchers. Often these trainees work part time at the university and part time as a trainee in clinical practice. However, little is known about the situation of the actors involved. The aim of the study was to investigate the perspectives of GP trainees, heads of departments and GP trainers regarding the combination of research and GP training. Methods: We conducted a web-based survey with the heads of all German departments of General Practice, GP trainees who also conduct research and their GP trainers. The questionnaires consisted of open and closed questions. The results were analyzed using descriptive statistics and qualitative methods. Results: 28 heads of GP departments and 20 GP trainees responded. The trainees were mostly very satisfied with their situation as a trainee. However, the trainees considered the combination of research and GP training as difficult. The respondents name as problems the coordination of multiple jobs and the lack of credibility given to research in General Practice. They name as solutions research-enabling training programs and uniform requirements in training regarding research. Conclusion: The combination of GP training and scientific research activity is perceived as difficult. However, well-organized and designed programs can improve the quality of the combination. German Medical Science GMS Publishing House 2014-08-15 /pmc/articles/PMC4152995/ /pubmed/25228933 http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000923 Text en Copyright © 2014 Kötter et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/). You are free to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Kötter, Thomas
Carmienke, Solveig
Herrmann, Wolfram J.
Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in General Practice. A cross-sectional study
title Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in General Practice. A cross-sectional study
title_full Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in General Practice. A cross-sectional study
title_fullStr Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in General Practice. A cross-sectional study
title_full_unstemmed Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in General Practice. A cross-sectional study
title_short Compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in General Practice. A cross-sectional study
title_sort compatibility of scientific research and specialty training in general practice. a cross-sectional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4152995/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25228933
http://dx.doi.org/10.3205/zma000923
work_keys_str_mv AT kotterthomas compatibilityofscientificresearchandspecialtytrainingingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudy
AT carmienkesolveig compatibilityofscientificresearchandspecialtytrainingingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudy
AT herrmannwolframj compatibilityofscientificresearchandspecialtytrainingingeneralpracticeacrosssectionalstudy