Cargando…

The Welfare Consequences and Efficacy of Training Pet Dogs with Remote Electronic Training Collars in Comparison to Reward Based Training

This study investigated the welfare consequences of training dogs in the field with manually operated electronic devices (e-collars). Following a preliminary study on 9 dogs, 63 pet dogs referred for recall related problems were assigned to one of three Groups: Treatment Group A were trained by indu...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Jonathan J., Cracknell, Nina, Hardiman, Jessica, Wright, Hannah, Mills, Daniel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4153538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102722
_version_ 1782333295826042880
author Cooper, Jonathan J.
Cracknell, Nina
Hardiman, Jessica
Wright, Hannah
Mills, Daniel
author_facet Cooper, Jonathan J.
Cracknell, Nina
Hardiman, Jessica
Wright, Hannah
Mills, Daniel
author_sort Cooper, Jonathan J.
collection PubMed
description This study investigated the welfare consequences of training dogs in the field with manually operated electronic devices (e-collars). Following a preliminary study on 9 dogs, 63 pet dogs referred for recall related problems were assigned to one of three Groups: Treatment Group A were trained by industry approved trainers using e-collars; Control Group B trained by the same trainers but without use of e-collars; and Group C trained by members of the Association of Pet Dog Trainers, UK again without e-collar stimulation (n = 21 for each Group). Dogs received two 15 minute training sessions per day for 4–5 days. Training sessions were recorded on video for behavioural analysis. Saliva and urine were collected to assay for cortisol over the training period. During preliminary studies there were negative changes in dogs' behaviour on application of electric stimuli, and elevated cortisol post-stimulation. These dogs had generally experienced high intensity stimuli without pre-warning cues during training. In contrast, in the subsequent larger, controlled study, trainers used lower settings with a pre-warning function and behavioural responses were less marked. Nevertheless, Group A dogs spent significantly more time tense, yawned more often and engaged in less environmental interaction than Group C dogs. There was no difference in urinary corticosteroids between Groups. Salivary cortisol in Group A dogs was not significantly different from that in Group B or Group C, though Group C dogs showed higher measures than Group B throughout sampling. Following training 92% of owners reported improvements in their dog's referred behaviour, and there was no significant difference in reported efficacy across Groups. Owners of dogs trained using e-collars were less confident of applying the training approach demonstrated. These findings suggest that there is no consistent benefit to be gained from e-collar training but greater welfare concerns compared with positive reward based training.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4153538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41535382014-09-05 The Welfare Consequences and Efficacy of Training Pet Dogs with Remote Electronic Training Collars in Comparison to Reward Based Training Cooper, Jonathan J. Cracknell, Nina Hardiman, Jessica Wright, Hannah Mills, Daniel PLoS One Research Article This study investigated the welfare consequences of training dogs in the field with manually operated electronic devices (e-collars). Following a preliminary study on 9 dogs, 63 pet dogs referred for recall related problems were assigned to one of three Groups: Treatment Group A were trained by industry approved trainers using e-collars; Control Group B trained by the same trainers but without use of e-collars; and Group C trained by members of the Association of Pet Dog Trainers, UK again without e-collar stimulation (n = 21 for each Group). Dogs received two 15 minute training sessions per day for 4–5 days. Training sessions were recorded on video for behavioural analysis. Saliva and urine were collected to assay for cortisol over the training period. During preliminary studies there were negative changes in dogs' behaviour on application of electric stimuli, and elevated cortisol post-stimulation. These dogs had generally experienced high intensity stimuli without pre-warning cues during training. In contrast, in the subsequent larger, controlled study, trainers used lower settings with a pre-warning function and behavioural responses were less marked. Nevertheless, Group A dogs spent significantly more time tense, yawned more often and engaged in less environmental interaction than Group C dogs. There was no difference in urinary corticosteroids between Groups. Salivary cortisol in Group A dogs was not significantly different from that in Group B or Group C, though Group C dogs showed higher measures than Group B throughout sampling. Following training 92% of owners reported improvements in their dog's referred behaviour, and there was no significant difference in reported efficacy across Groups. Owners of dogs trained using e-collars were less confident of applying the training approach demonstrated. These findings suggest that there is no consistent benefit to be gained from e-collar training but greater welfare concerns compared with positive reward based training. Public Library of Science 2014-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4153538/ /pubmed/25184218 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102722 Text en © 2014 Cooper et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Cooper, Jonathan J.
Cracknell, Nina
Hardiman, Jessica
Wright, Hannah
Mills, Daniel
The Welfare Consequences and Efficacy of Training Pet Dogs with Remote Electronic Training Collars in Comparison to Reward Based Training
title The Welfare Consequences and Efficacy of Training Pet Dogs with Remote Electronic Training Collars in Comparison to Reward Based Training
title_full The Welfare Consequences and Efficacy of Training Pet Dogs with Remote Electronic Training Collars in Comparison to Reward Based Training
title_fullStr The Welfare Consequences and Efficacy of Training Pet Dogs with Remote Electronic Training Collars in Comparison to Reward Based Training
title_full_unstemmed The Welfare Consequences and Efficacy of Training Pet Dogs with Remote Electronic Training Collars in Comparison to Reward Based Training
title_short The Welfare Consequences and Efficacy of Training Pet Dogs with Remote Electronic Training Collars in Comparison to Reward Based Training
title_sort welfare consequences and efficacy of training pet dogs with remote electronic training collars in comparison to reward based training
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4153538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184218
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0102722
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperjonathanj thewelfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining
AT cracknellnina thewelfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining
AT hardimanjessica thewelfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining
AT wrighthannah thewelfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining
AT millsdaniel thewelfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining
AT cooperjonathanj welfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining
AT cracknellnina welfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining
AT hardimanjessica welfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining
AT wrighthannah welfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining
AT millsdaniel welfareconsequencesandefficacyoftrainingpetdogswithremoteelectronictrainingcollarsincomparisontorewardbasedtraining