Cargando…
A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study
BACKGROUND: Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effe...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4153716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106765 |
_version_ | 1782333330200461312 |
---|---|
author | Ratzinger, Franz Dedeyan, Michel Rammerstorfer, Matthias Perkmann, Thomas Burgmann, Heinz Makristathis, Athanasios Dorffner, Georg Lötsch, Felix Blacky, Alexander Ramharter, Michael |
author_facet | Ratzinger, Franz Dedeyan, Michel Rammerstorfer, Matthias Perkmann, Thomas Burgmann, Heinz Makristathis, Athanasios Dorffner, Georg Lötsch, Felix Blacky, Alexander Ramharter, Michael |
author_sort | Ratzinger, Franz |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling, we computed a risk prediction model based on highly standardizable variables, with the ultimate goal to identify via an automated decision support tool patients with very low risk for bacteraemia. METHODS: In this retrospective hospital-wide cohort study evaluating 15,985 patients with suspected bacteraemia, 51 variables were assessed for their diagnostic potency. A derivation cohort (n = 14.699) was used for feature and model selection as well as for cut-off specification. Models were established using the A2DE classifier, a supervised Bayesian classifier. Two internally validated models were further evaluated by a validation cohort (n = 1,286). RESULTS: The proportion of neutrophile leukocytes in differential blood count was the best individual variable to predict bacteraemia (ROC-AUC: 0.694). Applying the A2DE classifier, two models, model 1 (20 variables) and model 2 (10 variables) were established with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.767 and 0.759, respectively. In the validation cohort, ROC-AUCs of 0.800 and 0.786 were achieved. Using predefined cut-off points, 16% and 12% of patients were allocated to the low risk group with a negative predictive value of more than 98.8%. CONCLUSION: Applying the proposed models, more than ten percent of patients with suspected blood stream infection were identified having minimal risk for bacteraemia. Based on these data the application of this model as an automated decision support tool for physicians is conceivable leading to a potential increase in the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling. External prospective validation of the model's generalizability is needed for further appreciation of the usefulness of this tool. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4153716 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41537162014-09-05 A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study Ratzinger, Franz Dedeyan, Michel Rammerstorfer, Matthias Perkmann, Thomas Burgmann, Heinz Makristathis, Athanasios Dorffner, Georg Lötsch, Felix Blacky, Alexander Ramharter, Michael PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling, we computed a risk prediction model based on highly standardizable variables, with the ultimate goal to identify via an automated decision support tool patients with very low risk for bacteraemia. METHODS: In this retrospective hospital-wide cohort study evaluating 15,985 patients with suspected bacteraemia, 51 variables were assessed for their diagnostic potency. A derivation cohort (n = 14.699) was used for feature and model selection as well as for cut-off specification. Models were established using the A2DE classifier, a supervised Bayesian classifier. Two internally validated models were further evaluated by a validation cohort (n = 1,286). RESULTS: The proportion of neutrophile leukocytes in differential blood count was the best individual variable to predict bacteraemia (ROC-AUC: 0.694). Applying the A2DE classifier, two models, model 1 (20 variables) and model 2 (10 variables) were established with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.767 and 0.759, respectively. In the validation cohort, ROC-AUCs of 0.800 and 0.786 were achieved. Using predefined cut-off points, 16% and 12% of patients were allocated to the low risk group with a negative predictive value of more than 98.8%. CONCLUSION: Applying the proposed models, more than ten percent of patients with suspected blood stream infection were identified having minimal risk for bacteraemia. Based on these data the application of this model as an automated decision support tool for physicians is conceivable leading to a potential increase in the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling. External prospective validation of the model's generalizability is needed for further appreciation of the usefulness of this tool. Public Library of Science 2014-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4153716/ /pubmed/25184209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106765 Text en © 2014 Ratzinger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Ratzinger, Franz Dedeyan, Michel Rammerstorfer, Matthias Perkmann, Thomas Burgmann, Heinz Makristathis, Athanasios Dorffner, Georg Lötsch, Felix Blacky, Alexander Ramharter, Michael A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study |
title | A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study |
title_full | A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study |
title_fullStr | A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study |
title_full_unstemmed | A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study |
title_short | A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study |
title_sort | risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4153716/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106765 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ratzingerfranz ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT dedeyanmichel ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT rammerstorfermatthias ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT perkmannthomas ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT burgmannheinz ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT makristathisathanasios ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT dorffnergeorg ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT lotschfelix ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT blackyalexander ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT ramhartermichael ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT ratzingerfranz riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT dedeyanmichel riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT rammerstorfermatthias riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT perkmannthomas riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT burgmannheinz riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT makristathisathanasios riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT dorffnergeorg riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT lotschfelix riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT blackyalexander riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy AT ramhartermichael riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy |