Cargando…

A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study

BACKGROUND: Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effe...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ratzinger, Franz, Dedeyan, Michel, Rammerstorfer, Matthias, Perkmann, Thomas, Burgmann, Heinz, Makristathis, Athanasios, Dorffner, Georg, Lötsch, Felix, Blacky, Alexander, Ramharter, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4153716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106765
_version_ 1782333330200461312
author Ratzinger, Franz
Dedeyan, Michel
Rammerstorfer, Matthias
Perkmann, Thomas
Burgmann, Heinz
Makristathis, Athanasios
Dorffner, Georg
Lötsch, Felix
Blacky, Alexander
Ramharter, Michael
author_facet Ratzinger, Franz
Dedeyan, Michel
Rammerstorfer, Matthias
Perkmann, Thomas
Burgmann, Heinz
Makristathis, Athanasios
Dorffner, Georg
Lötsch, Felix
Blacky, Alexander
Ramharter, Michael
author_sort Ratzinger, Franz
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling, we computed a risk prediction model based on highly standardizable variables, with the ultimate goal to identify via an automated decision support tool patients with very low risk for bacteraemia. METHODS: In this retrospective hospital-wide cohort study evaluating 15,985 patients with suspected bacteraemia, 51 variables were assessed for their diagnostic potency. A derivation cohort (n = 14.699) was used for feature and model selection as well as for cut-off specification. Models were established using the A2DE classifier, a supervised Bayesian classifier. Two internally validated models were further evaluated by a validation cohort (n = 1,286). RESULTS: The proportion of neutrophile leukocytes in differential blood count was the best individual variable to predict bacteraemia (ROC-AUC: 0.694). Applying the A2DE classifier, two models, model 1 (20 variables) and model 2 (10 variables) were established with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.767 and 0.759, respectively. In the validation cohort, ROC-AUCs of 0.800 and 0.786 were achieved. Using predefined cut-off points, 16% and 12% of patients were allocated to the low risk group with a negative predictive value of more than 98.8%. CONCLUSION: Applying the proposed models, more than ten percent of patients with suspected blood stream infection were identified having minimal risk for bacteraemia. Based on these data the application of this model as an automated decision support tool for physicians is conceivable leading to a potential increase in the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling. External prospective validation of the model's generalizability is needed for further appreciation of the usefulness of this tool.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4153716
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41537162014-09-05 A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study Ratzinger, Franz Dedeyan, Michel Rammerstorfer, Matthias Perkmann, Thomas Burgmann, Heinz Makristathis, Athanasios Dorffner, Georg Lötsch, Felix Blacky, Alexander Ramharter, Michael PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Bacteraemia is a frequent and severe condition with a high mortality rate. Despite profound knowledge about the pre-test probability of bacteraemia, blood culture analysis often results in low rates of pathogen detection and therefore increasing diagnostic costs. To improve the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling, we computed a risk prediction model based on highly standardizable variables, with the ultimate goal to identify via an automated decision support tool patients with very low risk for bacteraemia. METHODS: In this retrospective hospital-wide cohort study evaluating 15,985 patients with suspected bacteraemia, 51 variables were assessed for their diagnostic potency. A derivation cohort (n = 14.699) was used for feature and model selection as well as for cut-off specification. Models were established using the A2DE classifier, a supervised Bayesian classifier. Two internally validated models were further evaluated by a validation cohort (n = 1,286). RESULTS: The proportion of neutrophile leukocytes in differential blood count was the best individual variable to predict bacteraemia (ROC-AUC: 0.694). Applying the A2DE classifier, two models, model 1 (20 variables) and model 2 (10 variables) were established with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.767 and 0.759, respectively. In the validation cohort, ROC-AUCs of 0.800 and 0.786 were achieved. Using predefined cut-off points, 16% and 12% of patients were allocated to the low risk group with a negative predictive value of more than 98.8%. CONCLUSION: Applying the proposed models, more than ten percent of patients with suspected blood stream infection were identified having minimal risk for bacteraemia. Based on these data the application of this model as an automated decision support tool for physicians is conceivable leading to a potential increase in the cost-effectiveness of blood culture sampling. External prospective validation of the model's generalizability is needed for further appreciation of the usefulness of this tool. Public Library of Science 2014-09-03 /pmc/articles/PMC4153716/ /pubmed/25184209 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106765 Text en © 2014 Ratzinger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ratzinger, Franz
Dedeyan, Michel
Rammerstorfer, Matthias
Perkmann, Thomas
Burgmann, Heinz
Makristathis, Athanasios
Dorffner, Georg
Lötsch, Felix
Blacky, Alexander
Ramharter, Michael
A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study
title A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study
title_full A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study
title_fullStr A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study
title_short A Risk Prediction Model for Screening Bacteremic Patients: A Cross Sectional Study
title_sort risk prediction model for screening bacteremic patients: a cross sectional study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4153716/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25184209
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0106765
work_keys_str_mv AT ratzingerfranz ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT dedeyanmichel ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT rammerstorfermatthias ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT perkmannthomas ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT burgmannheinz ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT makristathisathanasios ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT dorffnergeorg ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT lotschfelix ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT blackyalexander ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT ramhartermichael ariskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT ratzingerfranz riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT dedeyanmichel riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT rammerstorfermatthias riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT perkmannthomas riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT burgmannheinz riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT makristathisathanasios riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT dorffnergeorg riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT lotschfelix riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT blackyalexander riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy
AT ramhartermichael riskpredictionmodelforscreeningbacteremicpatientsacrosssectionalstudy