Cargando…

Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study

Objectives  In view of forthcoming ‘payment by results’ (PbR) for mental health, increasing number of National Health Service (NHS) Trusts are reorganizing their community services for working age adults to create care pathways. However, research base for the care pathways model in mental health is...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Khandaker, Golam M., Gandamaneni, Praveen K., Dibben, Claire R. M., Cherukuru, Srinivasarao, Cairns, Paul, Ray, Manaan K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22360292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01822.x
_version_ 1782333366574514176
author Khandaker, Golam M.
Gandamaneni, Praveen K.
Dibben, Claire R. M.
Cherukuru, Srinivasarao
Cairns, Paul
Ray, Manaan K.
author_facet Khandaker, Golam M.
Gandamaneni, Praveen K.
Dibben, Claire R. M.
Cherukuru, Srinivasarao
Cairns, Paul
Ray, Manaan K.
author_sort Khandaker, Golam M.
collection PubMed
description Objectives  In view of forthcoming ‘payment by results’ (PbR) for mental health, increasing number of National Health Service (NHS) Trusts are reorganizing their community services for working age adults to create care pathways. However, research base for the care pathways model in mental health is limited. Our NHS Foundation Trust was one of the first to introduce care pathways for community psychiatry in the UK. We have carried out a qualitative study to evaluate how this model works out in practice, including its impact on quality of patient care, mental health professionals and primary care. Methods  We interviewed doctors, multidisciplinary staff and Trusts managers (19 in total). Transcripts of recorded interviews were coded and analysed thematically using a grounded theory approach. Results  Overall, despite teething problems, working in pathways was generally seen as a positive change. It led to more focused interventions being offered, and practitioners being held to account over clear standards of care. It is more cost‐effective and allows for active case management and clear clinical leadership. It is recovery focused and encourages social inclusion. The arbitrary time frame, strict criteria and thresholds for different teams can create issues. Improved communication, flexible and patient‐centred approach, staff supervision, and increasing support to primary care were felt to be central to this model working efficiently and effectively. Conclusions  Introduction of care pathways is an important step towards effective implementation of PbR for mental health. Our study would inform future research into care pathways, facilitate organizational learning and help to improve effectiveness of services.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4154123
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41541232014-09-22 Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study Khandaker, Golam M. Gandamaneni, Praveen K. Dibben, Claire R. M. Cherukuru, Srinivasarao Cairns, Paul Ray, Manaan K. J Eval Clin Pract Original Articles Objectives  In view of forthcoming ‘payment by results’ (PbR) for mental health, increasing number of National Health Service (NHS) Trusts are reorganizing their community services for working age adults to create care pathways. However, research base for the care pathways model in mental health is limited. Our NHS Foundation Trust was one of the first to introduce care pathways for community psychiatry in the UK. We have carried out a qualitative study to evaluate how this model works out in practice, including its impact on quality of patient care, mental health professionals and primary care. Methods  We interviewed doctors, multidisciplinary staff and Trusts managers (19 in total). Transcripts of recorded interviews were coded and analysed thematically using a grounded theory approach. Results  Overall, despite teething problems, working in pathways was generally seen as a positive change. It led to more focused interventions being offered, and practitioners being held to account over clear standards of care. It is more cost‐effective and allows for active case management and clear clinical leadership. It is recovery focused and encourages social inclusion. The arbitrary time frame, strict criteria and thresholds for different teams can create issues. Improved communication, flexible and patient‐centred approach, staff supervision, and increasing support to primary care were felt to be central to this model working efficiently and effectively. Conclusions  Introduction of care pathways is an important step towards effective implementation of PbR for mental health. Our study would inform future research into care pathways, facilitate organizational learning and help to improve effectiveness of services. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2012-02-23 2013-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC4154123/ /pubmed/22360292 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01822.x Text en © 2012 Blackwell Publishing Ltd
spellingShingle Original Articles
Khandaker, Golam M.
Gandamaneni, Praveen K.
Dibben, Claire R. M.
Cherukuru, Srinivasarao
Cairns, Paul
Ray, Manaan K.
Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study
title Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study
title_full Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study
title_fullStr Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study
title_full_unstemmed Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study
title_short Evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in England: a qualitative study
title_sort evaluating care pathways for community psychiatry in england: a qualitative study
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154123/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22360292
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2753.2012.01822.x
work_keys_str_mv AT khandakergolamm evaluatingcarepathwaysforcommunitypsychiatryinenglandaqualitativestudy
AT gandamanenipraveenk evaluatingcarepathwaysforcommunitypsychiatryinenglandaqualitativestudy
AT dibbenclairerm evaluatingcarepathwaysforcommunitypsychiatryinenglandaqualitativestudy
AT cherukurusrinivasarao evaluatingcarepathwaysforcommunitypsychiatryinenglandaqualitativestudy
AT cairnspaul evaluatingcarepathwaysforcommunitypsychiatryinenglandaqualitativestudy
AT raymanaank evaluatingcarepathwaysforcommunitypsychiatryinenglandaqualitativestudy