Cargando…

Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Particulate matter (PM) in outdoor air pollution was recently designated a Group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This determination was based on the evidence regarding the relationship of PM(2.5) and PM(10) to lung cancer risk; however, the IARC ev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hamra, Ghassan B., Guha, Neela, Cohen, Aaron, Laden, Francine, Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole, Samet, Jonathan M., Vineis, Paolo, Forastiere, Francesco, Saldiva, Paulo, Yorifuji, Takashi, Loomis, Dana
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: NLM-Export 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24911630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp/1408092
_version_ 1782333390077296640
author Hamra, Ghassan B.
Guha, Neela
Cohen, Aaron
Laden, Francine
Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole
Samet, Jonathan M.
Vineis, Paolo
Forastiere, Francesco
Saldiva, Paulo
Yorifuji, Takashi
Loomis, Dana
author_facet Hamra, Ghassan B.
Guha, Neela
Cohen, Aaron
Laden, Francine
Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole
Samet, Jonathan M.
Vineis, Paolo
Forastiere, Francesco
Saldiva, Paulo
Yorifuji, Takashi
Loomis, Dana
author_sort Hamra, Ghassan B.
collection PubMed
description Background: Particulate matter (PM) in outdoor air pollution was recently designated a Group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This determination was based on the evidence regarding the relationship of PM(2.5) and PM(10) to lung cancer risk; however, the IARC evaluation did not include a quantitative summary of the evidence. Objective: Our goal was to provide a systematic review and quantitative summary of the evidence regarding the relationship between PM and lung cancer. Methods: We conducted meta-analyses of studies examining the relationship of exposure to PM(2.5) and PM(10) with lung cancer incidence and mortality. In total, 18 studies met our inclusion criteria and provided the information necessary to estimate the change in lung cancer risk per 10-μg/m(3) increase in exposure to PM. We used random-effects analyses to allow between-study variability to contribute to meta-estimates. Results: The meta-relative risk for lung cancer associated with PM(2.5) was 1.09 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.14). The meta-relative risk of lung cancer associated with PM(10) was similar, but less precise: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.17). Estimates were robust to restriction to studies that considered potential confounders, as well as subanalyses by exposure assessment method. Analyses by smoking status showed that lung cancer risk associated with PM(2.5) was greatest for former smokers [1.44 (95% CI: 1.04, 2.01)], followed by never-smokers [1.18 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.39)], and then current smokers [1.06 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.15)]. In addition, meta-estimates for adenocarcinoma associated with PM(2.5) and PM(10) were 1.40 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.83) and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.63), respectively. Conclusion: The results of these analyses, and the decision of the IARC Working Group to classify PM and outdoor air pollution as carcinogenic (Group 1), further justify efforts to reduce exposures to air pollutants that can arise from many sources. Citation: Hamra GB, Guha N, Cohen A, Laden F, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Samet JM, Vineis P, Forastiere F, Saldiva P, Yorifuji T, Loomis D. 2014. Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 122:906–911; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408092
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4154221
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher NLM-Export
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41542212014-09-12 Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hamra, Ghassan B. Guha, Neela Cohen, Aaron Laden, Francine Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole Samet, Jonathan M. Vineis, Paolo Forastiere, Francesco Saldiva, Paulo Yorifuji, Takashi Loomis, Dana Environ Health Perspect Review Background: Particulate matter (PM) in outdoor air pollution was recently designated a Group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This determination was based on the evidence regarding the relationship of PM(2.5) and PM(10) to lung cancer risk; however, the IARC evaluation did not include a quantitative summary of the evidence. Objective: Our goal was to provide a systematic review and quantitative summary of the evidence regarding the relationship between PM and lung cancer. Methods: We conducted meta-analyses of studies examining the relationship of exposure to PM(2.5) and PM(10) with lung cancer incidence and mortality. In total, 18 studies met our inclusion criteria and provided the information necessary to estimate the change in lung cancer risk per 10-μg/m(3) increase in exposure to PM. We used random-effects analyses to allow between-study variability to contribute to meta-estimates. Results: The meta-relative risk for lung cancer associated with PM(2.5) was 1.09 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.14). The meta-relative risk of lung cancer associated with PM(10) was similar, but less precise: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.17). Estimates were robust to restriction to studies that considered potential confounders, as well as subanalyses by exposure assessment method. Analyses by smoking status showed that lung cancer risk associated with PM(2.5) was greatest for former smokers [1.44 (95% CI: 1.04, 2.01)], followed by never-smokers [1.18 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.39)], and then current smokers [1.06 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.15)]. In addition, meta-estimates for adenocarcinoma associated with PM(2.5) and PM(10) were 1.40 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.83) and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.63), respectively. Conclusion: The results of these analyses, and the decision of the IARC Working Group to classify PM and outdoor air pollution as carcinogenic (Group 1), further justify efforts to reduce exposures to air pollutants that can arise from many sources. Citation: Hamra GB, Guha N, Cohen A, Laden F, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Samet JM, Vineis P, Forastiere F, Saldiva P, Yorifuji T, Loomis D. 2014. Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 122:906–911; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408092 NLM-Export 2014-06-06 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4154221/ /pubmed/24911630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp/1408092 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Review
Hamra, Ghassan B.
Guha, Neela
Cohen, Aaron
Laden, Francine
Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole
Samet, Jonathan M.
Vineis, Paolo
Forastiere, Francesco
Saldiva, Paulo
Yorifuji, Takashi
Loomis, Dana
Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154221/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24911630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp/1408092
work_keys_str_mv AT hamraghassanb outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT guhaneela outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT cohenaaron outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT ladenfrancine outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT raaschounielsenole outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT sametjonathanm outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT vineispaolo outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT forastierefrancesco outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT saldivapaulo outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yorifujitakashi outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT loomisdana outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis