Cargando…
Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Particulate matter (PM) in outdoor air pollution was recently designated a Group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This determination was based on the evidence regarding the relationship of PM(2.5) and PM(10) to lung cancer risk; however, the IARC ev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
NLM-Export
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24911630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp/1408092 |
_version_ | 1782333390077296640 |
---|---|
author | Hamra, Ghassan B. Guha, Neela Cohen, Aaron Laden, Francine Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole Samet, Jonathan M. Vineis, Paolo Forastiere, Francesco Saldiva, Paulo Yorifuji, Takashi Loomis, Dana |
author_facet | Hamra, Ghassan B. Guha, Neela Cohen, Aaron Laden, Francine Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole Samet, Jonathan M. Vineis, Paolo Forastiere, Francesco Saldiva, Paulo Yorifuji, Takashi Loomis, Dana |
author_sort | Hamra, Ghassan B. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background: Particulate matter (PM) in outdoor air pollution was recently designated a Group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This determination was based on the evidence regarding the relationship of PM(2.5) and PM(10) to lung cancer risk; however, the IARC evaluation did not include a quantitative summary of the evidence. Objective: Our goal was to provide a systematic review and quantitative summary of the evidence regarding the relationship between PM and lung cancer. Methods: We conducted meta-analyses of studies examining the relationship of exposure to PM(2.5) and PM(10) with lung cancer incidence and mortality. In total, 18 studies met our inclusion criteria and provided the information necessary to estimate the change in lung cancer risk per 10-μg/m(3) increase in exposure to PM. We used random-effects analyses to allow between-study variability to contribute to meta-estimates. Results: The meta-relative risk for lung cancer associated with PM(2.5) was 1.09 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.14). The meta-relative risk of lung cancer associated with PM(10) was similar, but less precise: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.17). Estimates were robust to restriction to studies that considered potential confounders, as well as subanalyses by exposure assessment method. Analyses by smoking status showed that lung cancer risk associated with PM(2.5) was greatest for former smokers [1.44 (95% CI: 1.04, 2.01)], followed by never-smokers [1.18 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.39)], and then current smokers [1.06 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.15)]. In addition, meta-estimates for adenocarcinoma associated with PM(2.5) and PM(10) were 1.40 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.83) and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.63), respectively. Conclusion: The results of these analyses, and the decision of the IARC Working Group to classify PM and outdoor air pollution as carcinogenic (Group 1), further justify efforts to reduce exposures to air pollutants that can arise from many sources. Citation: Hamra GB, Guha N, Cohen A, Laden F, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Samet JM, Vineis P, Forastiere F, Saldiva P, Yorifuji T, Loomis D. 2014. Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 122:906–911; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408092 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4154221 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | NLM-Export |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41542212014-09-12 Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Hamra, Ghassan B. Guha, Neela Cohen, Aaron Laden, Francine Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole Samet, Jonathan M. Vineis, Paolo Forastiere, Francesco Saldiva, Paulo Yorifuji, Takashi Loomis, Dana Environ Health Perspect Review Background: Particulate matter (PM) in outdoor air pollution was recently designated a Group I carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). This determination was based on the evidence regarding the relationship of PM(2.5) and PM(10) to lung cancer risk; however, the IARC evaluation did not include a quantitative summary of the evidence. Objective: Our goal was to provide a systematic review and quantitative summary of the evidence regarding the relationship between PM and lung cancer. Methods: We conducted meta-analyses of studies examining the relationship of exposure to PM(2.5) and PM(10) with lung cancer incidence and mortality. In total, 18 studies met our inclusion criteria and provided the information necessary to estimate the change in lung cancer risk per 10-μg/m(3) increase in exposure to PM. We used random-effects analyses to allow between-study variability to contribute to meta-estimates. Results: The meta-relative risk for lung cancer associated with PM(2.5) was 1.09 (95% CI: 1.04, 1.14). The meta-relative risk of lung cancer associated with PM(10) was similar, but less precise: 1.08 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.17). Estimates were robust to restriction to studies that considered potential confounders, as well as subanalyses by exposure assessment method. Analyses by smoking status showed that lung cancer risk associated with PM(2.5) was greatest for former smokers [1.44 (95% CI: 1.04, 2.01)], followed by never-smokers [1.18 (95% CI: 1.00, 1.39)], and then current smokers [1.06 (95% CI: 0.97, 1.15)]. In addition, meta-estimates for adenocarcinoma associated with PM(2.5) and PM(10) were 1.40 (95% CI: 1.07, 1.83) and 1.29 (95% CI: 1.02, 1.63), respectively. Conclusion: The results of these analyses, and the decision of the IARC Working Group to classify PM and outdoor air pollution as carcinogenic (Group 1), further justify efforts to reduce exposures to air pollutants that can arise from many sources. Citation: Hamra GB, Guha N, Cohen A, Laden F, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Samet JM, Vineis P, Forastiere F, Saldiva P, Yorifuji T, Loomis D. 2014. Outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Environ Health Perspect 122:906–911; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1408092 NLM-Export 2014-06-06 2014-09 /pmc/articles/PMC4154221/ /pubmed/24911630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp/1408092 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, “Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives”); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright. |
spellingShingle | Review Hamra, Ghassan B. Guha, Neela Cohen, Aaron Laden, Francine Raaschou-Nielsen, Ole Samet, Jonathan M. Vineis, Paolo Forastiere, Francesco Saldiva, Paulo Yorifuji, Takashi Loomis, Dana Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title | Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Outdoor Particulate Matter Exposure and Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | outdoor particulate matter exposure and lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154221/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24911630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp/1408092 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hamraghassanb outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT guhaneela outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT cohenaaron outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT ladenfrancine outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT raaschounielsenole outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT sametjonathanm outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT vineispaolo outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT forastierefrancesco outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT saldivapaulo outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT yorifujitakashi outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT loomisdana outdoorparticulatematterexposureandlungcancerasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |