Cargando…
Can taking the perspective of an expert debias human decisions? The case of risky and delayed gains
In several previously reported studies, participants increased their normative correctness after being instructed to think hypothetically, specifically taking the perspective of an expert or researcher (Beatty and Thompson, 2012; Morsanyi and Handley, 2012). The goal of this paper was to investigate...
Autores principales: | Białek, Michał, Sawicki, Przemysław |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4154394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25237307 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00989 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Introducing conjoint analysis method into delayed lotteries studies: its validity and time stability are higher than in adjusting
por: Białek, Michał, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Taking gambles at face value: Effects of emotional expressions on risky decisions
por: Winkielman, Piotr, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Implementation and Assessment of an Intervention to Debias Adolescents against Causal Illusions
por: Barberia, Itxaso, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Does AI Debias Recruitment? Race, Gender, and AI’s “Eradication of Difference”
por: Drage, Eleanor, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
Why Can't We Accurately Predict Others' Decisions? Prediction Discrepancy in Risky Decision-Making
por: Sun, Qingzhou, et al.
Publicado: (2018)