Cargando…

Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries

[Purpose] The aim of the present study was described the kinematic characteristics of gait in stroke patients with two different arteries involved. [Subjects and Methods] Two patients who had suffered a basilar (A) or middle (B) cerebral artery ischemic stroke were compared with a control (C). Seven...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazuquin, Bruno Fles, Batista, João Pedro, Pereira, Ligia Maxwell, Dias, Josilainne Marcelino, Silva, Mariana Felipe, Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz, Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia, Moura, Felipe Arruda, Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1307
_version_ 1782333571166371840
author Mazuquin, Bruno Fles
Batista, João Pedro
Pereira, Ligia Maxwell
Dias, Josilainne Marcelino
Silva, Mariana Felipe
Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz
Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia
Moura, Felipe Arruda
Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa
author_facet Mazuquin, Bruno Fles
Batista, João Pedro
Pereira, Ligia Maxwell
Dias, Josilainne Marcelino
Silva, Mariana Felipe
Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz
Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia
Moura, Felipe Arruda
Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa
author_sort Mazuquin, Bruno Fles
collection PubMed
description [Purpose] The aim of the present study was described the kinematic characteristics of gait in stroke patients with two different arteries involved. [Subjects and Methods] Two patients who had suffered a basilar (A) or middle (B) cerebral artery ischemic stroke were compared with a control (C). Seventeen inertial sensors were used with acquisition rate of 120 Hz. The participants walked 3 times on a 10 meter walkway. From the raw data, the three gait cycles from the middle of each trial were chosen and analyzed. [Results] During the stance phase, patients A and B had a lower hip angle at initial contact and maximum flexion angle during load response than the control. Patient A and the control subject had similar knee angle values at initial contact, and patient B presented a flexed position in the initial phase of the gait cycle. The maximum flexion angles during loading response were also higher for patient B. The sagittal plane excursion for the ankle joint was lower for patient B in comparison with the other subjects. [Conclusion] Differences during walking between patients who had stroke in different arteries may be related to an alternative compensatory strategy. Patient A and the control subject had similar gait cycle curves at all joints, while patient B showed a rigid synergic pattern.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4155242
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Society of Physical Therapy Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41552422014-09-08 Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries Mazuquin, Bruno Fles Batista, João Pedro Pereira, Ligia Maxwell Dias, Josilainne Marcelino Silva, Mariana Felipe Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia Moura, Felipe Arruda Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa J Phys Ther Sci Case Study [Purpose] The aim of the present study was described the kinematic characteristics of gait in stroke patients with two different arteries involved. [Subjects and Methods] Two patients who had suffered a basilar (A) or middle (B) cerebral artery ischemic stroke were compared with a control (C). Seventeen inertial sensors were used with acquisition rate of 120 Hz. The participants walked 3 times on a 10 meter walkway. From the raw data, the three gait cycles from the middle of each trial were chosen and analyzed. [Results] During the stance phase, patients A and B had a lower hip angle at initial contact and maximum flexion angle during load response than the control. Patient A and the control subject had similar knee angle values at initial contact, and patient B presented a flexed position in the initial phase of the gait cycle. The maximum flexion angles during loading response were also higher for patient B. The sagittal plane excursion for the ankle joint was lower for patient B in comparison with the other subjects. [Conclusion] Differences during walking between patients who had stroke in different arteries may be related to an alternative compensatory strategy. Patient A and the control subject had similar gait cycle curves at all joints, while patient B showed a rigid synergic pattern. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014-08-30 2014-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4155242/ /pubmed/25202203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1307 Text en 2014©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License.
spellingShingle Case Study
Mazuquin, Bruno Fles
Batista, João Pedro
Pereira, Ligia Maxwell
Dias, Josilainne Marcelino
Silva, Mariana Felipe
Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz
Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia
Moura, Felipe Arruda
Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa
Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries
title Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries
title_full Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries
title_fullStr Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries
title_full_unstemmed Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries
title_short Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries
title_sort kinematic gait analysis using inertial sensors with subjects after stroke in two different arteries
topic Case Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155242/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202203
http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1307
work_keys_str_mv AT mazuquinbrunofles kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries
AT batistajoaopedro kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries
AT pereiraligiamaxwell kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries
AT diasjosilainnemarcelino kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries
AT silvamarianafelipe kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries
AT carregarorodrigoluiz kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries
AT lucarelipaulorobertogarcia kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries
AT mourafelipearruda kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries
AT cardosojeffersonrosa kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries