Cargando…
Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries
[Purpose] The aim of the present study was described the kinematic characteristics of gait in stroke patients with two different arteries involved. [Subjects and Methods] Two patients who had suffered a basilar (A) or middle (B) cerebral artery ischemic stroke were compared with a control (C). Seven...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Society of Physical Therapy Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1307 |
_version_ | 1782333571166371840 |
---|---|
author | Mazuquin, Bruno Fles Batista, João Pedro Pereira, Ligia Maxwell Dias, Josilainne Marcelino Silva, Mariana Felipe Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia Moura, Felipe Arruda Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa |
author_facet | Mazuquin, Bruno Fles Batista, João Pedro Pereira, Ligia Maxwell Dias, Josilainne Marcelino Silva, Mariana Felipe Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia Moura, Felipe Arruda Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa |
author_sort | Mazuquin, Bruno Fles |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Purpose] The aim of the present study was described the kinematic characteristics of gait in stroke patients with two different arteries involved. [Subjects and Methods] Two patients who had suffered a basilar (A) or middle (B) cerebral artery ischemic stroke were compared with a control (C). Seventeen inertial sensors were used with acquisition rate of 120 Hz. The participants walked 3 times on a 10 meter walkway. From the raw data, the three gait cycles from the middle of each trial were chosen and analyzed. [Results] During the stance phase, patients A and B had a lower hip angle at initial contact and maximum flexion angle during load response than the control. Patient A and the control subject had similar knee angle values at initial contact, and patient B presented a flexed position in the initial phase of the gait cycle. The maximum flexion angles during loading response were also higher for patient B. The sagittal plane excursion for the ankle joint was lower for patient B in comparison with the other subjects. [Conclusion] Differences during walking between patients who had stroke in different arteries may be related to an alternative compensatory strategy. Patient A and the control subject had similar gait cycle curves at all joints, while patient B showed a rigid synergic pattern. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-4155242 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Society of Physical Therapy Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-41552422014-09-08 Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries Mazuquin, Bruno Fles Batista, João Pedro Pereira, Ligia Maxwell Dias, Josilainne Marcelino Silva, Mariana Felipe Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia Moura, Felipe Arruda Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa J Phys Ther Sci Case Study [Purpose] The aim of the present study was described the kinematic characteristics of gait in stroke patients with two different arteries involved. [Subjects and Methods] Two patients who had suffered a basilar (A) or middle (B) cerebral artery ischemic stroke were compared with a control (C). Seventeen inertial sensors were used with acquisition rate of 120 Hz. The participants walked 3 times on a 10 meter walkway. From the raw data, the three gait cycles from the middle of each trial were chosen and analyzed. [Results] During the stance phase, patients A and B had a lower hip angle at initial contact and maximum flexion angle during load response than the control. Patient A and the control subject had similar knee angle values at initial contact, and patient B presented a flexed position in the initial phase of the gait cycle. The maximum flexion angles during loading response were also higher for patient B. The sagittal plane excursion for the ankle joint was lower for patient B in comparison with the other subjects. [Conclusion] Differences during walking between patients who had stroke in different arteries may be related to an alternative compensatory strategy. Patient A and the control subject had similar gait cycle curves at all joints, while patient B showed a rigid synergic pattern. The Society of Physical Therapy Science 2014-08-30 2014-08 /pmc/articles/PMC4155242/ /pubmed/25202203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1307 Text en 2014©by the Society of Physical Therapy Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial No Derivatives (by-nc-nd) License. |
spellingShingle | Case Study Mazuquin, Bruno Fles Batista, João Pedro Pereira, Ligia Maxwell Dias, Josilainne Marcelino Silva, Mariana Felipe Carregaro, Rodrigo Luiz Lucareli, Paulo Roberto Garcia Moura, Felipe Arruda Cardoso, Jefferson Rosa Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in Two Different Arteries |
title | Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in
Two Different Arteries |
title_full | Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in
Two Different Arteries |
title_fullStr | Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in
Two Different Arteries |
title_full_unstemmed | Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in
Two Different Arteries |
title_short | Kinematic Gait Analysis Using Inertial Sensors with Subjects after Stroke in
Two Different Arteries |
title_sort | kinematic gait analysis using inertial sensors with subjects after stroke in
two different arteries |
topic | Case Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155242/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25202203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1589/jpts.26.1307 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mazuquinbrunofles kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries AT batistajoaopedro kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries AT pereiraligiamaxwell kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries AT diasjosilainnemarcelino kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries AT silvamarianafelipe kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries AT carregarorodrigoluiz kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries AT lucarelipaulorobertogarcia kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries AT mourafelipearruda kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries AT cardosojeffersonrosa kinematicgaitanalysisusinginertialsensorswithsubjectsafterstrokeintwodifferentarteries |