Cargando…

Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) as conduit for endotracheal intubation

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: i-gel(®), a recently introduced supraglottic airway device (SAD) has been claimed to be an efficient supraglottic airway. It can also be used as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. However, LMA Fastrach(®) frequently used for this purpose; hence in this randomized study, succ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kapoor, Sameer, Jethava, Dharam Das, Gupta, Priyamvada, Jethava, Durga, Kumar, Alok
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25197106
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.138969
_version_ 1782333574316294144
author Kapoor, Sameer
Jethava, Dharam Das
Gupta, Priyamvada
Jethava, Durga
Kumar, Alok
author_facet Kapoor, Sameer
Jethava, Dharam Das
Gupta, Priyamvada
Jethava, Durga
Kumar, Alok
author_sort Kapoor, Sameer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: i-gel(®), a recently introduced supraglottic airway device (SAD) has been claimed to be an efficient supraglottic airway. It can also be used as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. However, LMA Fastrach(®) frequently used for this purpose; hence in this randomized study, success rate of blind tracheal intubation through two different SADs i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) was evaluated. The complications if any were also studied. METHODS: A total of 100 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised in two groups comprising of 50 patients each to tracheal intubation using either i-gel (I group) or LMA Fastrach (F group). After induction of anaesthesia SAD was inserted and on achieving adequate ventilation with the device, blind tracheal intubation was attempted through the SAD. Success at first-attempt and overall tracheal intubation success rates were evaluated, and tracheal intubation time was measured. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 software (Statistical Package for Social Sciences by International Business Machines Corporation). P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no difference in the incidence of adequate ventilation with either of the SAD. The success rate of tracheal intubation in first attempt was 66% in Group I and 74% in Group F, while overall success rate of tracheal intubation was 82% in Group I when compared to 96% in Group F. Time taken for successful tracheal intubation through LMA Fastrach was lesser (20.96 s) when compared to i-gel (24.04 s). Complication rates were statistically similar in both the groups. CONCLUSION: i-gel(®) is a better device for rescue ventilation due to its quick insertion but an inferior intubating device in comparison to LMA Fastrach(®).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4155283
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41552832014-09-05 Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) as conduit for endotracheal intubation Kapoor, Sameer Jethava, Dharam Das Gupta, Priyamvada Jethava, Durga Kumar, Alok Indian J Anaesth Clinical Investigation BACKGROUND AND AIMS: i-gel(®), a recently introduced supraglottic airway device (SAD) has been claimed to be an efficient supraglottic airway. It can also be used as a conduit for endotracheal intubation. However, LMA Fastrach(®) frequently used for this purpose; hence in this randomized study, success rate of blind tracheal intubation through two different SADs i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) was evaluated. The complications if any were also studied. METHODS: A total of 100 patients undergoing elective surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised in two groups comprising of 50 patients each to tracheal intubation using either i-gel (I group) or LMA Fastrach (F group). After induction of anaesthesia SAD was inserted and on achieving adequate ventilation with the device, blind tracheal intubation was attempted through the SAD. Success at first-attempt and overall tracheal intubation success rates were evaluated, and tracheal intubation time was measured. Data were analysed using IBM SPSS Statistics 20.0 software (Statistical Package for Social Sciences by International Business Machines Corporation). P < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. RESULTS: There was no difference in the incidence of adequate ventilation with either of the SAD. The success rate of tracheal intubation in first attempt was 66% in Group I and 74% in Group F, while overall success rate of tracheal intubation was 82% in Group I when compared to 96% in Group F. Time taken for successful tracheal intubation through LMA Fastrach was lesser (20.96 s) when compared to i-gel (24.04 s). Complication rates were statistically similar in both the groups. CONCLUSION: i-gel(®) is a better device for rescue ventilation due to its quick insertion but an inferior intubating device in comparison to LMA Fastrach(®). Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC4155283/ /pubmed/25197106 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.138969 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Investigation
Kapoor, Sameer
Jethava, Dharam Das
Gupta, Priyamvada
Jethava, Durga
Kumar, Alok
Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) as conduit for endotracheal intubation
title Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) as conduit for endotracheal intubation
title_full Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) as conduit for endotracheal intubation
title_fullStr Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) as conduit for endotracheal intubation
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) as conduit for endotracheal intubation
title_short Comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel(®) and LMA Fastrach(®) as conduit for endotracheal intubation
title_sort comparison of supraglottic devices i-gel(®) and lma fastrach(®) as conduit for endotracheal intubation
topic Clinical Investigation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155283/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25197106
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0019-5049.138969
work_keys_str_mv AT kapoorsameer comparisonofsupraglotticdevicesigelandlmafastrachasconduitforendotrachealintubation
AT jethavadharamdas comparisonofsupraglotticdevicesigelandlmafastrachasconduitforendotrachealintubation
AT guptapriyamvada comparisonofsupraglotticdevicesigelandlmafastrachasconduitforendotrachealintubation
AT jethavadurga comparisonofsupraglotticdevicesigelandlmafastrachasconduitforendotrachealintubation
AT kumaralok comparisonofsupraglotticdevicesigelandlmafastrachasconduitforendotrachealintubation