Cargando…
Comparing gene discovery from Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays and Clontech PCR-select cDNA subtraction: a case study
BACKGROUND: Several high throughput technologies have been employed to identify differentially regulated genes that may be molecular targets for drug discovery. Here we compared the sets of differentially regulated genes discovered using two experimental approaches: a subtracted suppressive hybridiz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC415544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15113399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-26 |
_version_ | 1782121407226839040 |
---|---|
author | Cao, Wuxiong Epstein, Charles Liu, Hong DeLoughery, Craig Ge, Nanxiang Lin, Jieyi Diao, Rong Cao, Hui Long, Fan Zhang, Xin Chen, Yangde Wright, Paul S Busch, Steve Wenck, Michelle Wong, Karen Saltzman, Alan G Tang, Zhihua Liu, Li Zilberstein, Asher |
author_facet | Cao, Wuxiong Epstein, Charles Liu, Hong DeLoughery, Craig Ge, Nanxiang Lin, Jieyi Diao, Rong Cao, Hui Long, Fan Zhang, Xin Chen, Yangde Wright, Paul S Busch, Steve Wenck, Michelle Wong, Karen Saltzman, Alan G Tang, Zhihua Liu, Li Zilberstein, Asher |
author_sort | Cao, Wuxiong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Several high throughput technologies have been employed to identify differentially regulated genes that may be molecular targets for drug discovery. Here we compared the sets of differentially regulated genes discovered using two experimental approaches: a subtracted suppressive hybridization (SSH) cDNA library methodology and Affymetrix GeneChip(® )technology. In this "case study" we explored the transcriptional pattern changes during the in vitro differentiation of human monocytes to myeloid dendritic cells (DC), and evaluated the potential for novel gene discovery using the SSH methodology. RESULTS: The same RNA samples isolated from peripheral blood monocyte precursors and immature DC (iDC) were used for GeneChip microarray probing and SSH cDNA library construction. 10,000 clones from each of the two-way SSH libraries (iDC-monocytes and monocytes-iDC) were picked for sequencing. About 2000 transcripts were identified for each library from 8000 successful sequences. Only 70% to 75% of these transcripts were represented on the U95 series GeneChip microarrays, implying that 25% to 30% of these transcripts might not have been identified in a study based only on GeneChip microarrays. In addition, about 10% of these transcripts appeared to be "novel", although these have not yet been closely examined. Among the transcripts that are also represented on the chips, about a third were concordantly discovered as differentially regulated between iDC and monocytes by GeneChip microarray transcript profiling. The remaining two thirds were either not inferred as differentially regulated from GeneChip microarray data, or were called differentially regulated but in the opposite direction. This underscores the importance both of generating reciprocal pairs of SSH libraries, and of real-time RT-PCR confirmation of the results. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that SSH could be used as an alternative and complementary transcript profiling tool to GeneChip microarrays, especially in identifying novel genes and transcripts of low abundance. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-415544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-4155442004-05-21 Comparing gene discovery from Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays and Clontech PCR-select cDNA subtraction: a case study Cao, Wuxiong Epstein, Charles Liu, Hong DeLoughery, Craig Ge, Nanxiang Lin, Jieyi Diao, Rong Cao, Hui Long, Fan Zhang, Xin Chen, Yangde Wright, Paul S Busch, Steve Wenck, Michelle Wong, Karen Saltzman, Alan G Tang, Zhihua Liu, Li Zilberstein, Asher BMC Genomics Methodology Article BACKGROUND: Several high throughput technologies have been employed to identify differentially regulated genes that may be molecular targets for drug discovery. Here we compared the sets of differentially regulated genes discovered using two experimental approaches: a subtracted suppressive hybridization (SSH) cDNA library methodology and Affymetrix GeneChip(® )technology. In this "case study" we explored the transcriptional pattern changes during the in vitro differentiation of human monocytes to myeloid dendritic cells (DC), and evaluated the potential for novel gene discovery using the SSH methodology. RESULTS: The same RNA samples isolated from peripheral blood monocyte precursors and immature DC (iDC) were used for GeneChip microarray probing and SSH cDNA library construction. 10,000 clones from each of the two-way SSH libraries (iDC-monocytes and monocytes-iDC) were picked for sequencing. About 2000 transcripts were identified for each library from 8000 successful sequences. Only 70% to 75% of these transcripts were represented on the U95 series GeneChip microarrays, implying that 25% to 30% of these transcripts might not have been identified in a study based only on GeneChip microarrays. In addition, about 10% of these transcripts appeared to be "novel", although these have not yet been closely examined. Among the transcripts that are also represented on the chips, about a third were concordantly discovered as differentially regulated between iDC and monocytes by GeneChip microarray transcript profiling. The remaining two thirds were either not inferred as differentially regulated from GeneChip microarray data, or were called differentially regulated but in the opposite direction. This underscores the importance both of generating reciprocal pairs of SSH libraries, and of real-time RT-PCR confirmation of the results. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that SSH could be used as an alternative and complementary transcript profiling tool to GeneChip microarrays, especially in identifying novel genes and transcripts of low abundance. BioMed Central 2004-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC415544/ /pubmed/15113399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-26 Text en Copyright © 2004 Cao et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Article Cao, Wuxiong Epstein, Charles Liu, Hong DeLoughery, Craig Ge, Nanxiang Lin, Jieyi Diao, Rong Cao, Hui Long, Fan Zhang, Xin Chen, Yangde Wright, Paul S Busch, Steve Wenck, Michelle Wong, Karen Saltzman, Alan G Tang, Zhihua Liu, Li Zilberstein, Asher Comparing gene discovery from Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays and Clontech PCR-select cDNA subtraction: a case study |
title | Comparing gene discovery from Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays and Clontech PCR-select cDNA subtraction: a case study |
title_full | Comparing gene discovery from Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays and Clontech PCR-select cDNA subtraction: a case study |
title_fullStr | Comparing gene discovery from Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays and Clontech PCR-select cDNA subtraction: a case study |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing gene discovery from Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays and Clontech PCR-select cDNA subtraction: a case study |
title_short | Comparing gene discovery from Affymetrix GeneChip microarrays and Clontech PCR-select cDNA subtraction: a case study |
title_sort | comparing gene discovery from affymetrix genechip microarrays and clontech pcr-select cdna subtraction: a case study |
topic | Methodology Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC415544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15113399 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2164-5-26 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT caowuxiong comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT epsteincharles comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT liuhong comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT delougherycraig comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT genanxiang comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT linjieyi comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT diaorong comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT caohui comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT longfan comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT zhangxin comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT chenyangde comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT wrightpauls comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT buschsteve comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT wenckmichelle comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT wongkaren comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT saltzmanalang comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT tangzhihua comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT liuli comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy AT zilbersteinasher comparinggenediscoveryfromaffymetrixgenechipmicroarraysandclontechpcrselectcdnasubtractionacasestudy |