Cargando…

Incorrect identification of recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 as human enterovirus 71: Improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by RT PCR

BACKGROUND: Human enterovirus 71 has emerged as an important pathogen in the Asia Pacific region and it is important to be able to make a rapid and specific diagnosis for outbreak control. Recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 have changes in the VP1 gene which causes mispriming of widely used...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perera, David, Podin, Yuwana, Akin, Winnie, Tan, Cheng-Siang, Cardosa, Mary Jane
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC415548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15122971
_version_ 1782121408167411712
author Perera, David
Podin, Yuwana
Akin, Winnie
Tan, Cheng-Siang
Cardosa, Mary Jane
author_facet Perera, David
Podin, Yuwana
Akin, Winnie
Tan, Cheng-Siang
Cardosa, Mary Jane
author_sort Perera, David
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Human enterovirus 71 has emerged as an important pathogen in the Asia Pacific region and it is important to be able to make a rapid and specific diagnosis for outbreak control. Recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 have changes in the VP1 gene which causes mispriming of widely used primers for human enterovirus 71 specific identification. METHODS: Local strains of Coxsackievirus A16 were sequenced in the VP4 and VP1 genes and using sequence alignment tools, an improved set of primers were designed for specific identification of human enterovirus 71. These primers were evaluated against virus isolates as well as primary clinical specimens. RESULTS: A total of 218 virus strains were tested. All 39 human enterovirus 71 isolates were positive and none of the 38 Coxsackievirus A16, 127 other enteroviruses and 14 prototype flaviviruses and adenoviruses were positive when tested with the new primers. When aliquots of primary specimens known to have yielded human enterovirus 71 were retrospectively tested, we found that within 2 months of collection of the specimens, greater than 90% were positive but that the success rate diminished rapidly to 18% after 2 years storage. CONCLUSIONS: Our new primers will be useful in rapid diagnosis of human enterovirus 71 infection, and can also be used as a screening tool in surveillance programmes for early warning of human enterovirus 71 transmission.
format Text
id pubmed-415548
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-4155482004-05-21 Incorrect identification of recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 as human enterovirus 71: Improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by RT PCR Perera, David Podin, Yuwana Akin, Winnie Tan, Cheng-Siang Cardosa, Mary Jane BMC Infect Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Human enterovirus 71 has emerged as an important pathogen in the Asia Pacific region and it is important to be able to make a rapid and specific diagnosis for outbreak control. Recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 have changes in the VP1 gene which causes mispriming of widely used primers for human enterovirus 71 specific identification. METHODS: Local strains of Coxsackievirus A16 were sequenced in the VP4 and VP1 genes and using sequence alignment tools, an improved set of primers were designed for specific identification of human enterovirus 71. These primers were evaluated against virus isolates as well as primary clinical specimens. RESULTS: A total of 218 virus strains were tested. All 39 human enterovirus 71 isolates were positive and none of the 38 Coxsackievirus A16, 127 other enteroviruses and 14 prototype flaviviruses and adenoviruses were positive when tested with the new primers. When aliquots of primary specimens known to have yielded human enterovirus 71 were retrospectively tested, we found that within 2 months of collection of the specimens, greater than 90% were positive but that the success rate diminished rapidly to 18% after 2 years storage. CONCLUSIONS: Our new primers will be useful in rapid diagnosis of human enterovirus 71 infection, and can also be used as a screening tool in surveillance programmes for early warning of human enterovirus 71 transmission. BioMed Central 2004-05-04 /pmc/articles/PMC415548/ /pubmed/15122971 Text en Copyright © 2004 Perera et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research Article
Perera, David
Podin, Yuwana
Akin, Winnie
Tan, Cheng-Siang
Cardosa, Mary Jane
Incorrect identification of recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 as human enterovirus 71: Improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by RT PCR
title Incorrect identification of recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 as human enterovirus 71: Improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by RT PCR
title_full Incorrect identification of recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 as human enterovirus 71: Improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by RT PCR
title_fullStr Incorrect identification of recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 as human enterovirus 71: Improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by RT PCR
title_full_unstemmed Incorrect identification of recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 as human enterovirus 71: Improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by RT PCR
title_short Incorrect identification of recent Asian strains of Coxsackievirus A16 as human enterovirus 71: Improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by RT PCR
title_sort incorrect identification of recent asian strains of coxsackievirus a16 as human enterovirus 71: improved primers for the specific detection of human enterovirus 71 by rt pcr
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC415548/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15122971
work_keys_str_mv AT pereradavid incorrectidentificationofrecentasianstrainsofcoxsackievirusa16ashumanenterovirus71improvedprimersforthespecificdetectionofhumanenterovirus71byrtpcr
AT podinyuwana incorrectidentificationofrecentasianstrainsofcoxsackievirusa16ashumanenterovirus71improvedprimersforthespecificdetectionofhumanenterovirus71byrtpcr
AT akinwinnie incorrectidentificationofrecentasianstrainsofcoxsackievirusa16ashumanenterovirus71improvedprimersforthespecificdetectionofhumanenterovirus71byrtpcr
AT tanchengsiang incorrectidentificationofrecentasianstrainsofcoxsackievirusa16ashumanenterovirus71improvedprimersforthespecificdetectionofhumanenterovirus71byrtpcr
AT cardosamaryjane incorrectidentificationofrecentasianstrainsofcoxsackievirusa16ashumanenterovirus71improvedprimersforthespecificdetectionofhumanenterovirus71byrtpcr