Cargando…

Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Review

BACKGROUND: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have become immensely popular in a short span of time. However, there is very little research exploring MOOCs in the discipline of health and medicine. OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide a review of MOOCs related to health and medicine offered by various MOO...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu Rekha, Williams, Shirley Ann
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25123952
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3439
_version_ 1782333618837782528
author Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu Rekha
Williams, Shirley Ann
author_facet Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu Rekha
Williams, Shirley Ann
author_sort Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu Rekha
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have become immensely popular in a short span of time. However, there is very little research exploring MOOCs in the discipline of health and medicine. OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide a review of MOOCs related to health and medicine offered by various MOOC platforms in 2013, by analyzing and comparing the various offerings, their target audience, typical length of course, and credentials offered. We also discuss opportunities and challenges presented by MOOCs in health and medicine. METHODS: Health and medicine–related MOOCs were gathered using several methods to ensure the richness and completeness of data. Identified MOOC platform websites were used to gather the lists of offerings. In parallel, these MOOC platforms were contacted to access official data on their offerings. Two MOOC aggregator sites (Class Central and MOOC List) were also consulted to gather data on MOOC offerings. Eligibility criteria were defined to concentrate on the courses that were offered in 2013 and primarily on the subject of health and medicine. All language translations in this paper were done using Google Translate. RESULTS: The search identified 225 courses, of which 98 were eligible for the review. Over half (58%, 57/98) of the MOOCs considered were offered on the Coursera platform, and 94% (92/98) of all the MOOCs were offered in English. Universities offered 90 MOOCs, and the John Hopkins University offered the largest number of MOOCs (12/90). Only three MOOCs were offered by developing countries (China, West Indies, and Saudi Arabia). The duration of MOOCs varied from 3-20 weeks with an average length of 6.7 weeks. On average, MOOCs expected a participant to work on the material for 4.2 hours a week. Verified certificates were offered by 14 MOOCs, while three others offered other professional recognition. CONCLUSIONS: The review presents evidence to suggest that MOOCs can be used as a way to provide continuous medical education. It also shows the potential of MOOCs as a means of increasing health literacy among the public.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-4155756
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher JMIR Publications Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-41557562014-09-12 Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Review Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu Rekha Williams, Shirley Ann J Med Internet Res Review BACKGROUND: Massive open online courses (MOOCs) have become immensely popular in a short span of time. However, there is very little research exploring MOOCs in the discipline of health and medicine. OBJECTIVE: We aim to provide a review of MOOCs related to health and medicine offered by various MOOC platforms in 2013, by analyzing and comparing the various offerings, their target audience, typical length of course, and credentials offered. We also discuss opportunities and challenges presented by MOOCs in health and medicine. METHODS: Health and medicine–related MOOCs were gathered using several methods to ensure the richness and completeness of data. Identified MOOC platform websites were used to gather the lists of offerings. In parallel, these MOOC platforms were contacted to access official data on their offerings. Two MOOC aggregator sites (Class Central and MOOC List) were also consulted to gather data on MOOC offerings. Eligibility criteria were defined to concentrate on the courses that were offered in 2013 and primarily on the subject of health and medicine. All language translations in this paper were done using Google Translate. RESULTS: The search identified 225 courses, of which 98 were eligible for the review. Over half (58%, 57/98) of the MOOCs considered were offered on the Coursera platform, and 94% (92/98) of all the MOOCs were offered in English. Universities offered 90 MOOCs, and the John Hopkins University offered the largest number of MOOCs (12/90). Only three MOOCs were offered by developing countries (China, West Indies, and Saudi Arabia). The duration of MOOCs varied from 3-20 weeks with an average length of 6.7 weeks. On average, MOOCs expected a participant to work on the material for 4.2 hours a week. Verified certificates were offered by 14 MOOCs, while three others offered other professional recognition. CONCLUSIONS: The review presents evidence to suggest that MOOCs can be used as a way to provide continuous medical education. It also shows the potential of MOOCs as a means of increasing health literacy among the public. JMIR Publications Inc. 2014-08-14 /pmc/articles/PMC4155756/ /pubmed/25123952 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3439 Text en ©Tharindu Rekha Liyanagunawardena, Shirley Ann Williams. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 14.08.2014. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Review
Liyanagunawardena, Tharindu Rekha
Williams, Shirley Ann
Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Review
title Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Review
title_full Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Review
title_fullStr Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Review
title_full_unstemmed Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Review
title_short Massive Open Online Courses on Health and Medicine: Review
title_sort massive open online courses on health and medicine: review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4155756/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25123952
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3439
work_keys_str_mv AT liyanagunawardenatharindurekha massiveopenonlinecoursesonhealthandmedicinereview
AT williamsshirleyann massiveopenonlinecoursesonhealthandmedicinereview